IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: about violation of standards

Erik Kline <ek@loon.com> Thu, 25 April 2019 16:46 UTC

Return-Path: <ek@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B49412031E for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 09:46:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=loon.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3P3OBo5Zqzii for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 09:46:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd34.google.com (mail-io1-xd34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76313120241 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 09:46:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd34.google.com with SMTP id r18so560837ioh.2 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 09:46:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=loon.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=j11qHZI+HPsb2rI4hFGWozRFCcQatpK+iIzljvQMq00=; b=NgSAeff/BLecBlreNqGbQPqkkS93IE2DBPNqKPZxHgcsSnrPsWg0EiaXEGNlufl1Gy +wt5MdY1u/pWU8oGsHz6pa/pLp4dIZPCY8AENmrw/o6LQ4nPn18OMfE5outdrgbCwckV 6yB8si6MsmJMCINYRrvDvuO0PsyuneY+o6V+Y=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=j11qHZI+HPsb2rI4hFGWozRFCcQatpK+iIzljvQMq00=; b=Ie7kRzTw82AqYeepCnZypgm65DNDwZI3fKPVf00Ipp8tgIAQ1AaLT1rHKF6Dx/wRNh zVtEvBidx+8J+ai/9N+vhuCnLtgacqbhmguFisLYHZpSqisUYBQKlPY/GAT3QjJ+ZAHH 4R9lWwDoQ27/aF+Rwd2tdZY1hA9+eoa44BdOB3DWsfko0IOBUbFJCQejxFwCNgkpfNVA iaEpIVPtahCVzQFeIx6osYX57uAl8S2VkPdBYOoH+gV1FxgZkkNOqs1C4j9oEMKV0ywu tWi3qq+tL/3ZaglhwixaTJDaAZ1Nx8KZIIfeEnW+ee23gil/uH4h0VqOLSUGMAUnRF7z RUHw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXaSzDcn8iZKdPDt3/Y6FtTBt2scKiy4zxfFi4ySZcH256p8TIh 50k72TY5XUIL+RF+CzOCwUsSdWYPrJ9hDpLMy19rgafPQJs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyDGnlImV5Y81u/m2dnyygriAt6cFJeiQ84A7M3+sWPNO91iyE3Zi55xBinEk3ugShx63egEVNsptNDZD2xn+I=
X-Received: by 2002:a5e:8f09:: with SMTP id c9mr17763325iok.62.1556210802431; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 09:46:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <bb7f7606-2adf-e669-8bcd-e41f17800782@gmail.com> <CAJE_bqd9frqX5-yeVPj8MYXpZ4737HqK1gmfD9cQV3A-Ea5HrQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKQ4NaWLGh3f_dN6WVNnYs9fKL8=vfpnShAK8AczPo8LE8LjFA@mail.gmail.com> <43399e1f-d60a-f678-abf3-eb69defd962c@gmail.com> <CAKQ4NaUGvPxSOAD-+FTxcq3ghUkWbOwR82G-GAG9kDCT+gBzTQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAAedzxo+5J=f1sf+gEJXm+aN7AJJUgasxsBd36JYm6GuuFfi=w@mail.gmail.com> <CAKQ4NaVwzE2-D2nxAqh4-W15MwfLEwYTrYA-VXpnXz56LLgBnQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKQ4NaVwzE2-D2nxAqh4-W15MwfLEwYTrYA-VXpnXz56LLgBnQ@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: ek@loon.com
From: Erik Kline <ek@loon.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 09:46:30 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAedzxowiMaY2W8cjSD8NmeJg48G_h7+0u5Hi3QPSMtO4zfZwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: about violation of standards
To: Yucel Guven <yucel.guven@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>, IPv6 <ipv6@ietf.org>, 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000013ad8505875d906a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/ZzGWy-f6oJXqONayUQp4T934I0Q>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 08 May 2019 05:28:00 -0700
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 16:46:58 -0000

I not sure I see any standards violation and therefore I don't see any need
to update any standards.

Every interface had the default link-local prefix assigned (fe80::/64).  No
problem.

Every interface also had another prefx, fe80:ifindex::/64, configured.
This prefix is also link-local because it's from within fe80::/10.

I see no problem here.  I don't see that any standards need to be updated,
bis'ed, amended, or tweaked.

On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 at 08:05, Yucel Guven <yucel.guven@gmail.com> wrote:

> Nothing prevents me, I'm sure it also works with other linux distributions.
>
> But, do you mean that it worked in your linux,
> and in fact "RFC is not compatible" with your machine's OS?
>
> Then;
> What prevents you from opening your word processor
> and from proposing/writing your ideas
> into a document that is called a 'draft'?
>
>>
>>>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email