IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario

Jon Watte <jwatte@gmail.com> Sat, 14 March 2009 19:01 UTC

Return-Path: <jwatte@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28F2C3A6B93 for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 12:01:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.575
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.575 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.024, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PPeYKIYJs1m0 for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 12:01:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.225]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B14128B23E for <mmox@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 12:01:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id g9so1211127rvb.5 for <mmox@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 12:02:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wz3Aa7HQHEXb6rBlq8s0U/Jbe6UkKCr4RaRxcz+/GiI=; b=h0IQUzHbQ5FWeWqx8YXnKDgR+tYepax42VK2kPbYSh42z19p0JX8jqwq3LM1GEeRx2 PsozSsCxd4JpU/QkoP7IK8+wcrI7cv01PNQ+b2g64H73lNVUba5PUEiDIhqICOhnrV7o x9/iPkJX3odW1AbUqYvNpr5V44XW48oFKDweU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=muAOfOm+2HpvsXypmVGfCoOSMmc0tfz4UWgo4UObz+VveOofCXKEny0r0+iL4hHQFY 54J5fDD1x0HWcdKgCjAVZ9WZ0SkiH3RTayZCtf7MAQE9GJKqlpgJkSEG6GYXjEObyWjN FHP/ei/ocodaVWKo2WusflF1wosEPGoZU3ZZM=
Received: by 10.115.16.14 with SMTP id t14mr1867064wai.34.1237057344132; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 12:02:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?192.168.1.101? (svn.mindcontrol.org [69.17.45.136]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k14sm2892886waf.58.2009.03.14.12.02.23 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 14 Mar 2009 12:02:23 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <49BBFF3E.4040005@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 12:02:22 -0700
From: Jon Watte <jwatte@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: eh2th-mmox@yahoo.com
References: <e0b04bba0903120735s5311a922ybbc40a30433166a3@mail.gmail.com> <49B934B9.3080408@gmail.com> <49B940DF.8040009@lindenlab.com> <e0b04bba0903130451v2d33f9ebxfa3b337513bf286c@mail.gmail.com> <49BB0C46.8070809@gmail.com> <909621.80144.qm@web65707.mail.ac4.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <909621.80144.qm@web65707.mail.ac4.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: MMOX-IETF <mmox@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mmox] 3-world OGP interop scenario
X-BeenThere: mmox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Massively Multi-participant Online Games and Applications <mmox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmox>
List-Post: <mailto:mmox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 19:01:48 -0000

eh2th-mmox@yahoo.com wrote:
> As a user, I would prefer a client which could connect to multiple services, and I would partially base my decision on which services were desirable to subscribe to by how capable 

It's great that you prefer this! To get a measurement (of a sample of 
one), could you answer this question?
How much, in dollars, would you pay for this client, as opposed to 
downloading separate clients to separate worlds?


>  another company, another barrier to entry. While I probably would not be willing to pay extra for a client which could function with multiple worlds, companies that
>   

So the answer is zero dollars? That means that your preference is quite 
weak, almost not measurable (economically speaking).

Sincerely,

jw

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email