Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the Generic Client model

Morgaine <morgaine.dinova@googlemail.com> Mon, 16 March 2009 12:43 UTC

Return-Path: <morgaine.dinova@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 175083A6AE2 for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 05:43:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.159
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.159 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.672, BAYES_05=-1.11, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mE12AHP7blmd for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 05:43:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ew0-f177.google.com (mail-ew0-f177.google.com [209.85.219.177]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E66DF3A677D for <mmox@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 05:43:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ewy25 with SMTP id 25so3448220ewy.37 for <mmox@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 05:44:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=byViDypPFJmPtuwOy8onmmYrRyA71LXaKxfEYugxT8I=; b=iBYq9+Y6hviNls2RXf9qV04lW3PVlgg0I0b5sUfqHmJQX5/KG3S/Wy9eqYRxavASjL ihvzBePXkirqFs4Dm+NEoM/cxoAU8rffneOwQTFw3YDmmD6pTvtm007zWd+7Fhoq8cv7 m+L6sniTJtFGVWz29Q4sQD+UmOilUNWd7z3Fo=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=ouIrnHQdtgMez4lefPdTRkJah/Aw0d1VKzWl1Fcnokcuu6QbOUK8kXYVv5dZ7UvncI gZY2Lhvu+LKDh/I2CYq6MVSsY66Jwl1shoLywb2HPDD14C6/dLXDjZPBh2+AF2Gtqk88 sF3vsWsXXHR5lE+e54Cs6gRyIrbtz05daYL+g=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.210.141.17 with SMTP id o17mr3090248ebd.20.1237207474082; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 05:44:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <e0b04bba0903160515p649b378endc877170ed2dd641@mail.gmail.com>
References: <e0b04bba0903120735s5311a922ybbc40a30433166a3@mail.gmail.com> <e0b04bba0903130451v2d33f9ebxfa3b337513bf286c@mail.gmail.com> <49BB0C46.8070809@gmail.com> <e0b04bba0903140305ocdbef86kcec140371dabf00b@mail.gmail.com> <49BC08DC.2010503@gmail.com> <e0b04bba0903150441y2b0037c7ne33a7ef6c883eb37@mail.gmail.com> <49BD6123.2080703@gmail.com> <e0b04bba0903151557u5312299ehe0a548f5790fb7a5@mail.gmail.com> <49BDD5F1.5090303@gmail.com> <e0b04bba0903160515p649b378endc877170ed2dd641@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:44:34 +0000
Message-ID: <e0b04bba0903160544s4822dc0qcc71a4e0ba952486@mail.gmail.com>
From: Morgaine <morgaine.dinova@googlemail.com>
To: Jon Watte <jwatte@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0015174bf0f80193e504653bd01f"
Cc: MMOX-IETF <mmox@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mmox] One more time: The LESS model vs the Generic Client model
X-BeenThere: mmox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Massively Multi-participant Online Games and Applications <mmox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmox>
List-Post: <mailto:mmox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:43:54 -0000

Once we get to the stage of examining and improving protocol drafts, I
suggest that any protocol description that mentions viewers or clients be
given a paragraph along the lines of:


The term "client" denotes a particular *role* in the protocol, one of the
two endpoints in a client-server relationship.  The protocol does not
proscribe where this role is implemented.  While the most common
implementation of the *client role* is likely to be within a user
application, nothing precludes that role being implemented within a server,
such as a worlds-interface server or a proxy for more distant clients.


Or something like that. ;-)

The goal is simply to get us beyond the current pro-client/anti-client
discussion, which like almost all polarized pro/anti discussions, is rarely
constructive.


Morgaine.