[mpls] Closed - Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates as an mpls working group document

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Sat, 19 March 2016 03:04 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD94912D6AD; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 20:04:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MCwi1VHClJsZ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 20:04:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu []) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BCAD12D66E; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 20:04:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [] (unknown []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 76F10180155A; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 04:04:02 +0100 (CET)
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
References: <56DA9B26.8050800@pi.nu>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <56ECC18A.8030101@pi.nu>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 11:03:38 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <56DA9B26.8050800@pi.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/QkgmjnTaiHxH26vmKaVwRiXi9m0>
Cc: "draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates@ietf.org" <draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: [mpls] Closed - Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates as an mpls working group document
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 03:04:12 -0000

Working Group,

This working group adoption poll is closed.

We have a new wg document! Can the authors please post
with no other changes than file name, version and dates.

mpls wg co-chair

On 2016-03-05 16:39, Loa Andersson wrote:
> Working Group,
> This is to start a two week poll on adopting draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-
> updates as an MPLS working group document.
> Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working
> group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org). Please give a technical
> motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that
> the document should not be adopted as a working group document.
> There are no IPR disclosures against this document.
> All the authors has stated on the on the mpls wg mailing list that they
> are not aware of any IPRs that relate to this document.
> Note: One of the issues that surfaced in the MPLS-RT review was that the
> implementation status was unclear. To check on this we did an early
> implementation poll. There have been responses to the mailing, to the
> mpls wg chairs and to my uni-directionally. The conclusion is that
> RFC 7271 (the specification that this document updates) is well
> implemented and we know of deployments; a rather large number of
> vendors says that they will implement this draft and operators has
> stated that it will be deployed once it is available.
> The working group adoption poll ends March 19, 2016.
> /Loa
> MPLS wg co-chair.