Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates as an mpls working group document

SeunghyunShim_MODO <shs4139@modonet.kr> Mon, 07 March 2016 14:51 UTC

User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.5.8.151023
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 23:45:01 +0900
From: SeunghyunShim_MODO <shs4139@modonet.kr>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <D303C2BE.9D10%shs4139@modonet.kr>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates as an mpls working group document
References: <56DA9B26.8050800@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <56DA9B26.8050800@pi.nu>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="EUC-KR"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/lAnB93S5JqFLwwOVaguPehTADcs>
Cc: "draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates@ietf.org" <draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates as an mpls working group document
Precedence: list

Yes, I support. This work is useful to fix the issues related to
initialization of PSC in APS mode.


BR
SH Shim

On 2016. 3. 5. 오후 5:39, "mpls on behalf of Loa Andersson"
<mpls-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of loa@pi.nu> wrote:

>Working Group,
>
>This is to start a two week poll on adopting draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-
>updates as an MPLS working group document.
>
>Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working
>group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org). Please give a technical
>motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that
>the document should not be adopted as a working group document.
>
>There are no IPR disclosures against this document.
>
>All the authors has stated on the on the mpls wg mailing list that they
>are not aware of any IPRs that relate to this document.
>
>Note: One of the issues that surfaced in the MPLS-RT review was that the
>implementation status was unclear. To check on this we did an early
>implementation poll. There have been responses to the mailing, to the
>mpls wg chairs and to my uni-directionally. The conclusion is that
>RFC 7271 (the specification that this document updates) is well
>implemented and we know of deployments; a rather large number of
>vendors says that they will implement this draft and operators has
>stated that it will be deployed once it is available.
>
>The working group adoption poll ends March 19, 2016.
>
>/Loa
>
>MPLS wg co-chair.
>-- 
>
>
>Loa Andersson                        email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
>Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@pi.nu
>Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64
>
>_______________________________________________
>mpls mailing list
>mpls@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>
>
>

[mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt … Loa Andersson
Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Adrian Farrel
Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Ryoo, Jeong-dong
Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Zhangxian (Xian)
Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Yang, Jong Han
[mpls] R: Poll to see if we have consensus to ado… D'Alessandro Alessandro Gerardo
Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… 정태식
Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Andrew G. Malis
Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Huub van Helvoort
Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Yuji Tochio
Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Italo Busi
Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… SeunghyunShim_MODO
Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Akira Sakurai
Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Rolf Winter
Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… 이광국 (Infra 구조 Project)
[mpls] Closed - Poll to see if we have consensus … Loa Andersson
Re: [mpls] Closed - Poll to see if we have consen… Ryoo, Jeong-dong