Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates as an mpls working group document

[Akira Sakurai <[e-mail]>]

I support.

BR, Akira

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpls [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Loa Andersson
> Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2016 5:39 PM
> To: [e-mail]
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates as an mpls
> working group document
> 
> Working Group,
> 
> This is to start a two week poll on adopting draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps- updates as an MPLS working group
> document.
> 
> Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working group mailing list ([e-mail]).
> Please give a technical motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that the
> document should not be adopted as a working group document.
> 
> There are no IPR disclosures against this document.
> 
> All the authors has stated on the on the mpls wg mailing list that they are not aware of any IPRs that
> relate to this document.
> 
> Note: One of the issues that surfaced in the MPLS-RT review was that the implementation status was
> unclear. To check on this we did an early implementation poll. There have been responses to the mailing,
> to the mpls wg chairs and to my uni-directionally. The conclusion is that RFC 7271 (the specification
> that this document updates) is well implemented and we know of deployments; a rather large number of
> vendors says that they will implement this draft and operators has stated that it will be deployed
> once it is available.
> 
> The working group adoption poll ends March 19, 2016.
> 
> /Loa
> 
> MPLS wg co-chair.
> --
> 
> 
> Loa Andersson                        email: [e-mail]
> Senior MPLS Expert                          [e-mail]
> Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: [phone]
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls