Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates as an mpls working group document

Akira Sakurai <a-sakurai@da.jp.nec.com> Mon, 07 March 2016 15:00 UTC

Return-Path: <a-sakurai@da.jp.nec.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C85B61B401E; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 07:00:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.693
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.693 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0shH6UJWEEsi; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 07:00:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp (TYO201.gate.nec.co.jp [210.143.35.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C21061B4204; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 07:00:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgate3.nec.co.jp ([10.7.69.197]) by tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id u27F06ok024740; Tue, 8 Mar 2016 00:00:06 +0900 (JST)
Received: from mailsv4.nec.co.jp (imss62.nec.co.jp [10.7.69.157]) by mailgate3.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W-MAILGATE-NEC) with ESMTP id u27F06p08865; Tue, 8 Mar 2016 00:00:06 +0900 (JST)
Received: from mail01b.kamome.nec.co.jp (mail01b.kamome.nec.co.jp [10.25.43.2]) by mailsv4.nec.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id u27F05KX027086; Tue, 8 Mar 2016 00:00:05 +0900 (JST)
Received: from bpxc99gp.gisp.nec.co.jp ([10.38.151.141] [10.38.151.141]) by mail03.kamome.nec.co.jp with ESMTP id BT-MMP-6069794; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 23:59:42 +0900
Received: from BPXM16GP.gisp.nec.co.jp ([10.38.151.208]) by BPXC13GP.gisp.nec.co.jp ([10.38.151.141]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 23:59:41 +0900
From: Akira Sakurai <a-sakurai@da.jp.nec.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates as an mpls working group document
Thread-Index: AQHRdrqF0W3ZfLdFEUa68ZGlRZkkoJ9OFduA
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 14:59:39 +0000
Message-ID: <2303F18444F57448A9C105D09C9257613DC5E428@BPXM16GP.gisp.nec.co.jp>
References: <56DA9B26.8050800@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <56DA9B26.8050800@pi.nu>
Accept-Language: ja-JP, en-US
Content-Language: ja-JP
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.38.125.82]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/xXHPa0Bi1vHNzY8LLRxxP8hqrHo>
Cc: "draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates@ietf.org" <draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates as an mpls working group document
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 15:00:17 -0000

I support.

BR, Akira

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpls [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Loa Andersson
> Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2016 5:39 PM
> To: mpls@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates@ietf.org; mpls-chairs@ietf.org
> Subject: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates as an mpls
> working group document
> 
> Working Group,
> 
> This is to start a two week poll on adopting draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps- updates as an MPLS working group
> document.
> 
> Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org).
> Please give a technical motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that the
> document should not be adopted as a working group document.
> 
> There are no IPR disclosures against this document.
> 
> All the authors has stated on the on the mpls wg mailing list that they are not aware of any IPRs that
> relate to this document.
> 
> Note: One of the issues that surfaced in the MPLS-RT review was that the implementation status was
> unclear. To check on this we did an early implementation poll. There have been responses to the mailing,
> to the mpls wg chairs and to my uni-directionally. The conclusion is that RFC 7271 (the specification
> that this document updates) is well implemented and we know of deployments; a rather large number of
> vendors says that they will implement this draft and operators has stated that it will be deployed
> once it is available.
> 
> The working group adoption poll ends March 19, 2016.
> 
> /Loa
> 
> MPLS wg co-chair.
> --
> 
> 
> Loa Andersson                        email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
> Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@pi.nu
> Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls