Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates as an mpls working group document
"Yang, Jong Han" <yjh@nia.or.kr> Mon, 07 March 2016 06:56 UTC
Return-Path: <yjh@nia.or.kr>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 592EC1B353E for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Mar 2016 22:56:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SB2BNCTRZUkm for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Mar 2016 22:56:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mscreen1.nia.or.kr (mscreen1.nia.or.kr [202.30.73.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDC281B3539 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Sun, 6 Mar 2016 22:56:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unknown (HELO sniper.nia.or.kr) (202.30.73.17) by 202.30.73.22 with ESMTP; 7 Mar 2016 15:55:02 +0900
X-Original-SENDERIP: 202.30.73.17
X-Original-MAILFROM: yjh@nia.or.kr
Received: from unknown (HELO YajohaNote) (172.25.103.148) by 202.30.73.17 with ESMTP; 7 Mar 2016 15:51:11 +0900
X-Original-SENDERIP: 172.25.103.148
X-Original-MAILFROM: yjh@nia.or.kr
X-Original-RCPTTO: draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates@ietf.org, loa@pi.nu, mpls@ietf.org, mpls-chairs@ietf.org
From: "Yang, Jong Han" <yjh@nia.or.kr>
To: 'Loa Andersson' <loa@pi.nu>, mpls@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 15:56:44 +0900
Message-ID: <002d01d1783e$82882140$879863c0$@nia.or.kr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdF4PYnZTgYTkOzDRO22krKBwU//Eg==
Content-Language: ko
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/yrZxLiaVO7ZOBmuRroDFLe9ffDQ>
Cc: draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates@ietf.org, mpls-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates as an mpls working group document
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 06:56:48 -0000
Yes, Support Jong Han, Yang ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2016 16:39:02 +0800 From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org> Cc: "draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates@ietf.org" <draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org> Subject: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates as an mpls working group document Message-ID: <56DA9B26.8050800@pi.nu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Working Group, This is to start a two week poll on adopting draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps- updates as an MPLS working group document. Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org) Please give a technical motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that the document should not be adopted as a working group document. There are no IPR disclosures against this document. All the authors has stated on the on the mpls wg mailing list that they are not aware of any IPRs that relate to this document. Note: One of the issues that surfaced in the MPLS-RT review was that the implementation status was unclear. To check on this we did an early implementation poll. There have been responses to the mailing, to the mpls wg chairs and to my uni-directionally. The conclusion is that RFC 7271 (the specification that this document updates) is well implemented and we know of deployments; a rather large number of vendors says that they will implement this draft and operators has stated that it will be deployed once it is available. The working group adoption poll ends March 19, 2016. /Loa MPLS wg co-chair. -- Loa Andersson email: loa@mail01.huawei.com Senior MPLS Expert loa@pi.nu Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64
- [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt … Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Ryoo, Jeong-dong
- Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Zhangxian (Xian)
- Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Yang, Jong Han
- [mpls] R: Poll to see if we have consensus to ado… D'Alessandro Alessandro Gerardo
- Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… 정태식
- Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Yuji Tochio
- Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Italo Busi
- Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… SeunghyunShim_MODO
- Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Akira Sakurai
- Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Rolf Winter
- Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… 이광국 (Infra 구조 Project)
- [mpls] Closed - Poll to see if we have consensus … Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] Closed - Poll to see if we have consen… Ryoo, Jeong-dong