Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates as an mpls working group document

"Yang, Jong Han" <yjh@nia.or.kr> Mon, 07 March 2016 06:56 UTC

From: "Yang, Jong Han" <yjh@nia.or.kr>
To: 'Loa Andersson' <loa@pi.nu>, mpls@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 15:56:44 +0900
Message-ID: <002d01d1783e$82882140$879863c0$@nia.or.kr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Thread-Index: AdF4PYnZTgYTkOzDRO22krKBwU//Eg==
Content-Language: ko
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/yrZxLiaVO7ZOBmuRroDFLe9ffDQ>
Cc: draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates@ietf.org, mpls-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates as an mpls working group document
Precedence: list

Yes, Support

Jong Han, Yang



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2016 16:39:02 +0800
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Cc: "draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates@ietf.org"
	<draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org"
	<mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt
	draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates as an mpls working group document
Message-ID: <56DA9B26.8050800@pi.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed

Working Group,

This is to start a two week poll on adopting draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps- updates
as an MPLS working group document.

Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working group
mailing list (mpls@ietf.org). Please give a technical motivation for your
support/not support, especially if you think that the document should not be
adopted as a working group document.

There are no IPR disclosures against this document.

All the authors has stated on the on the mpls wg mailing list that they are
not aware of any IPRs that relate to this document.

Note: One of the issues that surfaced in the MPLS-RT review was that the
implementation status was unclear. To check on this we did an early
implementation poll. There have been responses to the mailing, to the mpls
wg chairs and to my uni-directionally. The conclusion is that RFC 7271 (the
specification that this document updates) is well implemented and we know of
deployments; a rather large number of vendors says that they will implement
this draft and operators has stated that it will be deployed once it is
available.

The working group adoption poll ends March 19, 2016.

/Loa

MPLS wg co-chair.
-- 


Loa Andersson                        email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@pi.nu
Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64

[mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt … Loa Andersson
Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Adrian Farrel
Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Ryoo, Jeong-dong
Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Zhangxian (Xian)
Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Yang, Jong Han
[mpls] R: Poll to see if we have consensus to ado… D'Alessandro Alessandro Gerardo
Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… 정태식
Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Andrew G. Malis
Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Huub van Helvoort
Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Yuji Tochio
Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Italo Busi
Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… SeunghyunShim_MODO
Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Akira Sakurai
Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Rolf Winter
Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… 이광국 (Infra 구조 Project)
[mpls] Closed - Poll to see if we have consensus … Loa Andersson
Re: [mpls] Closed - Poll to see if we have consen… Ryoo, Jeong-dong