Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates as an mpls working group document

"Yang, Jong Han" <yjh@nia.or.kr> Mon, 07 March 2016 06:56 UTC

Return-Path: <yjh@nia.or.kr>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 592EC1B353E for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Mar 2016 22:56:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SB2BNCTRZUkm for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Mar 2016 22:56:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mscreen1.nia.or.kr (mscreen1.nia.or.kr [202.30.73.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDC281B3539 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Sun, 6 Mar 2016 22:56:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unknown (HELO sniper.nia.or.kr) (202.30.73.17) by 202.30.73.22 with ESMTP; 7 Mar 2016 15:55:02 +0900
X-Original-SENDERIP: 202.30.73.17
X-Original-MAILFROM: yjh@nia.or.kr
Received: from unknown (HELO YajohaNote) (172.25.103.148) by 202.30.73.17 with ESMTP; 7 Mar 2016 15:51:11 +0900
X-Original-SENDERIP: 172.25.103.148
X-Original-MAILFROM: yjh@nia.or.kr
X-Original-RCPTTO: draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates@ietf.org, loa@pi.nu, mpls@ietf.org, mpls-chairs@ietf.org
From: "Yang, Jong Han" <yjh@nia.or.kr>
To: "'Loa Andersson'" <loa@pi.nu>, <mpls@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 15:56:44 +0900
Message-ID: <002d01d1783e$82882140$879863c0$@nia.or.kr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdF4PYnZTgYTkOzDRO22krKBwU//Eg==
Content-Language: ko
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/yrZxLiaVO7ZOBmuRroDFLe9ffDQ>
Cc: draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates@ietf.org, mpls-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates as an mpls working group document
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 06:56:48 -0000

Yes, Support

Jong Han, Yang



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2016 16:39:02 +0800
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Cc: "draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates@ietf.org"
	<draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates@ietf.org>rg>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org"
	<mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt
	draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates as an mpls working group document
Message-ID: <56DA9B26.8050800@pi.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed

Working Group,

This is to start a two week poll on adopting draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps- updates
as an MPLS working group document.

Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working group
mailing list (mpls@ietf.org). Please give a technical motivation for your
support/not support, especially if you think that the document should not be
adopted as a working group document.

There are no IPR disclosures against this document.

All the authors has stated on the on the mpls wg mailing list that they are
not aware of any IPRs that relate to this document.

Note: One of the issues that surfaced in the MPLS-RT review was that the
implementation status was unclear. To check on this we did an early
implementation poll. There have been responses to the mailing, to the mpls
wg chairs and to my uni-directionally. The conclusion is that RFC 7271 (the
specification that this document updates) is well implemented and we know of
deployments; a rather large number of vendors says that they will implement
this draft and operators has stated that it will be deployed once it is
available.

The working group adoption poll ends March 19, 2016.

/Loa

MPLS wg co-chair.
-- 


Loa Andersson                        email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@pi.nu
Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64