Re: [mpls] Closed - Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates as an mpls working group document

"Ryoo, Jeong-dong " <ryoo@etri.re.kr> Sun, 20 March 2016 04:29 UTC

Return-Path: <ryoo@etri.re.kr>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3671E12D565; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 21:29:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xUUlTFjLyWfo; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 21:29:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpeg.etri.re.kr (smtpeg1.etri.re.kr [129.254.27.141]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FBF012D6A5; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 21:29:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SMTP1.etri.info (129.254.28.71) by SMTPEG1.etri.info (129.254.27.141) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.355.2; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 13:29:19 +0900
Received: from SMTP2.etri.info ([169.254.2.162]) by SMTP1.etri.info ([10.2.6.30]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 13:29:19 +0900
From: "Ryoo, Jeong-dong " <ryoo@etri.re.kr>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Closed - Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates as an mpls working group document
Thread-Index: AQHRdrqD1Laiwg2BakOZqMtr2DMLe59fk4kAgAJAo3o=
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 04:29:19 +0000
Message-ID: <5B4A6CBE3924BB41A3BEE462A8E0B75A291B4ED9@SMTP2.etri.info>
References: <56DA9B26.8050800@pi.nu>,<56ECC18A.8030101@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <56ECC18A.8030101@pi.nu>
Accept-Language: ko-KR, en-US
Content-Language: ko-KR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-new-displayname: UnlvbywgSmVvbmctZG9uZyA=
x-originating-ip: [129.254.28.43]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_5B4A6CBE3924BB41A3BEE462A8E0B75A291B4ED9SMTP2etriinfo_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/r3MYmxw1QZ2lKDVe82E2JxyTOOs>
Cc: "draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates@ietf.org" <draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Closed - Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates as an mpls working group document
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 04:29:25 -0000


Thank you, Loa.


draft-ietf-mpls-tp-aps-updates-00 has been uploaded now.


Jeong-dong




________________________________
보낸 사람 : "Loa Andersson" <loa@pi.nu>
보낸 날짜 : 2016-03-19 12:04:13 ( +09:00 )
받는 사람 : mpls@ietf.org <mpls@ietf.org>
참조 : mpls-chairs@ietf.org <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>rg>, draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates@ietf.org <draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates@ietf.org>
제목 : Closed - Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates as an mpls working group document



Working Group,





This working group adoption poll is closed.





We have a new wg document! Can the authors please post



draft-ietf-mpls-tp-aps-updates-00



with no other changes than file name, version and dates.





/Loa



mpls wg co-chair





On 2016-03-05 16:39, Loa Andersson wrote:



> Working Group,



>



> This is to start a two week poll on adopting draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-



> updates as an MPLS working group document.



>



> Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working



> group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org). Please give a technical



> motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that



> the document should not be adopted as a working group document.



>



> There are no IPR disclosures against this document.



>



> All the authors has stated on the on the mpls wg mailing list that they



> are not aware of any IPRs that relate to this document.



>



> Note: One of the issues that surfaced in the MPLS-RT review was that the



> implementation status was unclear. To check on this we did an early



> implementation poll. There have been responses to the mailing, to the



> mpls wg chairs and to my uni-directionally. The conclusion is that



> RFC 7271 (the specification that this document updates) is well



> implemented and we know of deployments; a rather large number of



> vendors says that they will implement this draft and operators has



> stated that it will be deployed once it is available.



>



> The working group adoption poll ends March 19, 2016.



>



> /Loa



>



> MPLS wg co-chair.