IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] working group last call ondraft-ietf-mpls-tp-mip-mep-map

"Puneet Agarwal" <pagarwal@broadcom.com> Tue, 04 December 2012 05:44 UTC

Return-Path: <pagarwal@broadcom.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 969BF21E8041 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 21:44:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uDMVeKQe+b6u for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 21:44:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mms1.broadcom.com (mms1.broadcom.com [216.31.210.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC25B21E8044 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 21:44:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.16.192.232] by mms1.broadcom.com with ESMTP (Broadcom SMTP Relay (Email Firewall v6.5)); Mon, 03 Dec 2012 21:42:00 -0800
X-Server-Uuid: 06151B78-6688-425E-9DE2-57CB27892261
Received: from SJEXCHCAS04.corp.ad.broadcom.com (10.16.203.11) by SJEXCHHUB02.corp.ad.broadcom.com (10.16.192.232) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.247.2; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 21:43:54 -0800
Received: from SJEXCHMB06.corp.ad.broadcom.com ( [fe80::65ea:1de7:41c4:e948]) by SJEXCHCAS04.corp.ad.broadcom.com ( [::1]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 21:43:33 -0800
From: Puneet Agarwal <pagarwal@broadcom.com>
To: "hideki.endo.es@hitachi.com" <hideki.endo.es@hitachi.com>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] working group last call ondraft-ietf-mpls-tp-mip-mep-map
Thread-Index: AQHN0eJLAQHjC8m1302u6b+ofzm6vQ==
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 05:43:32 +0000
Message-ID: <28AF076D-2D85-4B79-8A7E-0C1AE39D01DC@broadcom.com>
References: <5098CF68.2000105@pi.nu> <016e01cdc675$3b64d6b0$b22e8410$@olddog.co.uk> <4A6CE49E6084B141B15C0713B8993F281BD2E957@SJEXCHMB12.corp.ad.broa> <027c01cdc7c8$d5500430$7ff00c90$@olddog.co.uk> <F0E40950-2607-4AB5-BB17-88EFC41C1603@yahoo.com> <791AD3077F94194BB2BDD13565B6295D5552490A@Hydra.office.hd> <4A6CE49E6084B141B15C0713B8993F281BD2FBBB@SJEXCHMB12.corp.ad.broa> <38DFCE5F-A496-4AAC-A2C5-0450B5260EAD@broadcom.com> <CAGEmCZyDCBV-vdA96Amnx-08U-Xq_6t+mnF34k8o_8tX+4z2VQ@mail.gmail.c> <4A6CE49E6084B141B15C0713B8993F281BD338A7@SJEXCHMB12.corp.ad.broa> <791AD3077F94194BB2BDD13565B6295D555415E0@DAPHNIS.office.hd> <B5CDD7D1-CBD7-4E74-ADE6-0DEBE26E3757@broadcom.com> <791AD3077F94194BB2BDD13565B6295D55542847@DAPHNIS.office.hd> <4A6CE49E6084B141B15C0713B8993F281BD389A3@SJEXCHMB12.corp.ad.broa> <XNM1$7$0$0$$6$1$2$A$5003751U50bd483f@hitachi.com> <4A6CE49E6084B141B15C0713B8993F281BD38CA7@SJEXCHMB12.corp.ad.broa>, <XNM1$7$0$0$$6$1$2$A$5003753U50bd5093@hitachi.com>
In-Reply-To: <XNM1$7$0$0$$6$1$2$A$5003753U50bd5093@hitachi.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-WSS-ID: 7CA352A21QK14973449-01-01
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] working group last call ondraft-ietf-mpls-tp-mip-mep-map
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 05:44:10 -0000

Hi hideki,

Is the determination that the mip identifier is present in the same location  always in the pdu or is it variable (based on oam msg type)?

Thx

Puneet



On Dec 3, 2012, at 5:24 PM, "hideki.endo.es@hitachi.com" <hideki.endo.es@hitachi.com> wrote:

> draft-ietf-mpls-tp-mip-mep-map

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email