Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-mip-mep-map

Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com> Mon, 03 December 2012 18:20 UTC

Return-Path: <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2B7E21F8931 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 10:20:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UapQPPcYAR3H for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 10:20:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from imr3.ericy.com (imr3.ericy.com [198.24.6.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B719F21F891F for <mpls@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 10:20:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from eusaamw0711.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.178]) by imr3.ericy.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qB3IK2mG028283 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 3 Dec 2012 12:20:06 -0600
Received: from EUSAAHC001.ericsson.se (147.117.188.75) by eusaamw0711.eamcs.ericsson.se (147.117.20.178) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.279.1; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 13:20:05 -0500
Received: from EUSAAMB103.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.120]) by EUSAAHC001.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.75]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.001; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 13:20:05 -0500
From: Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>
To: Rolf Winter <Rolf.Winter@neclab.eu>, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-mip-mep-map
Thread-Index: AQHN0VxJlaR5XVhT/UaZmQSyL/75l5gHYOjw
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 18:20:04 +0000
Message-ID: <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF11201E837@eusaamb103.ericsson.se>
References: <5098CF68.2000105@pi.nu> <XNM1$7$0$0$$6$1$2$A$5003661U50a19cc6@hitachi.com> <50A3B5C0.4060203@pi.nu> <50B88D2A.30504@pi.nu> <791AD3077F94194BB2BDD13565B6295D555415BF@DAPHNIS.office.hd>
In-Reply-To: <791AD3077F94194BB2BDD13565B6295D555415BF@DAPHNIS.office.hd>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.135]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "mpls-ads@tools.ietf.org" <mpls-ads@tools.ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mpls-tp-mip-mep-map@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-mip-mep-map@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-mip-mep-map
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 18:20:09 -0000

Hi Rolf,
Do you envision that multiple MIPs, both in- and out-, required to be supported on a given LSP/PW? I think that     only single MIP required per LSP/PW on an LSR/PE node. If that is the case, then there might be no apparent need to explicitly address in- and out- MIP as such distinction becomes part of local configuration.

	Regards,
		Greg

-----Original Message-----
From: mpls-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Rolf Winter
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 5:42 AM
To: Loa Andersson; mpls@ietf.org
Cc: mpls-ads@tools.ietf.org; mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org; draft-ietf-mpls-tp-mip-mep-map@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-mip-mep-map

Loa,

These have been mentioned:

1. CV between a MEP and a MIP
2. traceroute over an MPLS-TP LSP and/or an MPLS-TP PW containing MIPs 3. data-plane loopback configuration at a MIP 4. diagnostic tests

Best,

Rolf

NEC Europe Limited | Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL | Registered in England 2832014 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Loa Andersson [mailto:loa@pi.nu]
> Sent: Freitag, 30. November 2012 11:41
> To: mpls@ietf.org
> Cc: mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org; Martin Vigoureux; draft-ietf-mpls-tp- 
> mip-mep-map@tools.ietf.org; mpls-ads@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-mip-mep-map
> 
> Authors,
> 
> Can you plese give me an indication of which OAM functions the 
> separation of in and out MIPs are intended for?
> 
> /Loa
> 
> 
> 
> On 2012-11-14 16:16, Loa Andersson wrote:
> >
> > Working Group,
> >
> > This is to start a 2 week working group last call on 
> > draft-ietf-mpls-tp-mip-mep-map.
> >
> > Please send your comments to the mpls working group mailing list 
> > (mpls@ietf.org).
> >
> > Please send both technical comments, and if you are happy with the 
> > document as is also indications of support.
> >
> > This working group last call will end on November 28.
> >
> > /Loa
> > for the wg co-chairs
> >
> >
> 
> --
> 
> 
> Loa Andersson                         email: loa.andersson@ericsson.com
> Sr Strategy and Standards Manager            loa@pi.nu
> Ericsson Inc                          phone: +46 10 717 52 13
>                                               +46 767 72 92 13
_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls