Re: [Mtgvenue] Political considerations (was: Re: Comments on draft-baker-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-02

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Fri, 28 October 2016 14:59 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49BBB12967E for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 07:59:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=jodHqYAq; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=SKlHJcKs
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ackr9e0bBVv0 for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 07:59:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E062F1293EE for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 07:59:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D25420802; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 10:59:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 28 Oct 2016 10:59:17 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=X+9NLZX89LpHhU/ JoiUhFqW0zuM=; b=jodHqYAqfqz3JbIhiEOMvp9J/1JYuuPHkILsI8Zmy13GooG wsa7VtpL/4sVBOrwXgRcTX7soJp6DfJX6OpOmGZ4fcxxF1Zu2k2lONQgsfeCgwvo WeCEXVjEyB4tx028PRphj68GFbw0aBKnnnDdJUXaT1uWPyUgDDBzuMRhzZPg=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s= smtpout; bh=X+9NLZX89LpHhU/JoiUhFqW0zuM=; b=SKlHJcKsfSc5xmjtvKV5 r87+96a7cqPv7NuY9joEsXxg3aORJ2DvPXQay+qiGOMcMGl+WQNoFy2E5IuKAVHu nNixqqNd0ZTcDHY26odHGSN3c0sFupKDdDkQWQdTxSjpmbRPxJQoM6ilRlb7U3tr PjREjSwBs7GCjGOX4pl2zaQ=
X-ME-Sender: <xms:xWcTWGLzJNu9JKVibFeAaxc8WMxbGg7xYRlA43EhOdXSt-y4jf-Xzw>
X-Sasl-enc: YhN7MEjX6Qb3wuj+LmSIQOwKhcy4g9ojRuigHf16byOh 1477666757
Received: from sjc-alcoop-8812.cisco.com (unknown [128.107.241.181]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id ACE4DCC02C; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 10:59:16 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <08a7728b-0cf0-2a33-9278-d965c40a10b8@dcrocker.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 10:59:15 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E40CA684-9E5D-45EA-8F75-99B436F11044@cooperw.in>
References: <E3C933A5-6141-437A-ABA9-CF881BC8149E@cooperw.in> <08a7728b-0cf0-2a33-9278-d965c40a10b8@dcrocker.net>
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/7u2eMGZhkaEG4XNKAAPOVblWLRg>
Cc: mtgvenue@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] Political considerations (was: Re: Comments on draft-baker-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-02
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 14:59:19 -0000

Hi Dave,

> On Oct 28, 2016, at 10:02 AM, Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Alissa, et al:
> 
> On 6/22/2016 6:49 AM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
>> (b) Political considerations
>> 
>> "we do not choose or not choose venues based on political criteria."
>> 
>> What does this mean exactly? We know that the IETF is getting paid by
>> local governments to hold meetings in many (but not all) locations. That
>> doesn't seem like an entirely apolitical activity. Furthermore, both of
>> the prongs of the inclusivity principle derive from actions that local
>> governments take and that we then consider in selecting venues. If none
>> of those are considered "political criteria" then what would be? Perhaps
>> there is a better way to phrase this that doesn't appear contradictory.
> 
> 
> Ignoring the line of academic debate some economists and political scientists like to have claiming that the two topics are highly related and maybe even the same topic...
> 
> 
> The IETF takes sponsorship funds from a host country as an economic incentive, independent of the country's political details.
> 
> Individuals who participate in selection discussions often offer comments about a country's politics, but I believe they do not wind up affecting the choices directly, nor are they typically discussed at length.
> 
> Rather, matters of convenience, cost, safety and other purely logistical and operational matters for the criteria that get used. And I think we have a number of places we've gone and places we haven't gone, that reflect a fair range of political paradigms, demonstrating this.
> 
> As such, I believe the current draft text is exactly correct.

I think the definition of “political criteria” latent in what you say above would perhaps be a better fit than just saying “political criteria.” Something like political orientation/paradigm/system in place at the venue location would capture this point better.

Thanks,
Alissa

> 
> d/
> -- 
> 
>  Dave Crocker
>  Brandenburg InternetWorking
>  bbiw.net