IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mtgvenue] Comments on draft-baker-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-02

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> Sun, 06 November 2016 19:42 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FD911295D0 for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 11:42:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I5iZjlx1WjkK for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 11:42:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22d.google.com (mail-pf0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E354F129632 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 11:42:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id i88so79183436pfk.2 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Sun, 06 Nov 2016 11:42:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:subject:to:references:cc:reply-to:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AUIlDJqmeH/WvVk+eBGyZjn8Ux2I1wHlXbAuo+T6/Ms=; b=B6VGO1cESKenHPtmk85i7heiyjaymSu99JNsQWRIMg5Jtn0OnPhUmGIlS9q/GIRb2P sfy8wEZyz5WvdaUeVpIVwH7Mi2aIfqgU8zQ4+0Ry09Bmt4lA6TvwqaOl1TRNCMnNQyxL d1kHLNnKtcYB4LfNUY0oOHAXduSFA3uqZBXIhV8yiHg/Eq6YmErIzyos2PUYoYpzX7wB 8hL4JOXatWWGXAGdtp9BzMMvA2dXBBIqRNfG0j45U0EY9XbUMcjggpA9OO2ldAKSff78 HgAlp/PKerOjSqNhEqPFxGMZ9zyK4948EVhf/ZsKvqouWY1I5/TVPpyq2PJAYkxw+IWI 9CZQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:subject:to:references:cc:reply-to :organization:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=AUIlDJqmeH/WvVk+eBGyZjn8Ux2I1wHlXbAuo+T6/Ms=; b=BEp58zcQkK08s5HHqb5Ik0ByeeuoxQN6CLFzEH3+VsDVbOe3USi9vh6irPp38PY86b h3PizTYdDjjQsD3f3jeRDG0TT0IDd9BENx3PJiUvFpk3AeRZKxv6/WRN1iH4xHdSYLQh V/+RjH8nn+o77gCX0G1eBH5J5pwuIrVe/MTkw36PI9yDlNh1aShC+1NK4FA5COrqPaFU ZBGv3WpqC2TJvqZyFoj0VZUk3ranEQMSHToY/wRvxACXbqjqNBQpXUyHxsbgAf3/bk+Q T6jj8yKJyvk3e0OBkk4xQclgqpyDngOxcnPCcQGJ9okY0SMarLPWUnzR0uBJ+V5o5/+5 ubnA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvdUf8E5M3D7QcRB2HTNr9J54LiqZmx76Al3mvH2h5ovTxcfWN+6qrSSAoiptcvsAg==
X-Received: by 10.99.66.130 with SMTP id p124mr5489166pga.30.1478461369439; Sun, 06 Nov 2016 11:42:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2602:304:cda0:8800:d0c4:5336:57f3:1e21? ([2602:304:cda0:8800:d0c4:5336:57f3:1e21]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id fm6sm34706772pab.37.2016.11.06.11.42.47 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 06 Nov 2016 11:42:48 -0800 (PST)
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Google-Original-From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
To: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>, Fred Baker <FredBaker.IETF@gmail.com>
References: <E3C933A5-6141-437A-ABA9-CF881BC8149E@cooperw.in> <50f9aade-69aa-0f49-05a6-00c891f96070@dcrocker.net> <2fcf2945-094a-0041-a464-8965d0a472d2@gmail.com> <C86363C1-B427-4278-B325-C883C6DEB7D3@gmail.com> <7eb36108-79cc-a3f5-6c41-1d7e4b1b849e@gmail.com> <f7b3c9ea-de33-26d1-8f0a-3ce82860771e@dcrocker.net> <B7162C59-16C7-4885-8524-AC8BAAD3BAE7@amsl.com> <CD6FCB8F-5A3C-4309-A784-5EFA926D1FEB@gmail.com> <30CCBC03-BF67-4A94-A8AE-7BBFB906C350@gmail.com> <4863C35E-E6E2-418B-828E-34D453D5D509@gmail.com>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <59ae8ddf-d28b-35f2-1607-362c559f078c@dcrocker.net>
Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2016 11:42:43 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4863C35E-E6E2-418B-828E-34D453D5D509@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/xZuONhb27yDz1_0SUcV5pglEArw>
Cc: mtgvenue@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] Comments on draft-baker-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-02
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2016 19:42:51 -0000

On 11/6/2016 11:21 AM, Yoav Nir wrote:
> I think that by now the network available in average hotels is sufficiently non-horrible that we can live with the same kind of network as everyone else.


This is a basic point.  And a specific assessment.  I think I've seen 
some disagreement.

It would be helpful to get some discussion that focuses both on the 
facts of the assessment and the willingness of the community to live 
with existing venue Internet infrastructure, even if that winds up 
sometimes being problematic.

d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email