IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mtgvenue] Comments on draft-baker-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-02

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 05 November 2016 07:52 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A51DC1296A9 for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Nov 2016 00:52:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nYCLUqOPmFNu for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Nov 2016 00:52:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x232.google.com (mail-oi0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7ED161295E1 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Sat, 5 Nov 2016 00:52:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x232.google.com with SMTP id v84so191116035oie.3 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Sat, 05 Nov 2016 00:52:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=YtLBkfDTMxnA18VAxqYCXCeysCk8iHP63ifZQfe4eUs=; b=Dfq2yoFgmxQ7dbtwJ3DnAREpjTZNEyl4qHpJ2mt8RMP2/kNnAZs4Nq/BT1XOIqxPKv r8Hef7mVWCJVQh0gWQ8EL8IjQuDRj18f4VondvBQEL8IhhN2n6i1DMA5XI+NTapmut6O D3lkCxiekKIrwqZg0AM0yZ0FGzf2YKeJrpVOJjITmjVFthIGzmIeoxWOYQTjw4GdLc6h ekG4ANywyMknZfT2+YHPMhUR26e7oI/tOGc4CBETE1faYEKjZ/zhy5MF2fS8NYYJay+2 t7AEbXUYq7ZJI3uiyWsm09Y81vlYnwQN74YAuDdSgu7BlARyGTiYb3WYj+xyX3jt/Xfy 1PcQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=YtLBkfDTMxnA18VAxqYCXCeysCk8iHP63ifZQfe4eUs=; b=CIp1Z7Sn2tkezS1UlzPSEo7q7OsQPIE8oy3DslBFeKOuX90ThEhGqaWmuLA9AFzXgz E9sZoAWyA65pDEEWFAVPEiDqk8pqQnEOaDTv3YJzdpDcOoegN6gvwy4SRocQRHCyhAhl /8zq7EwPAwt4+hhSVjRmnh5SO2aqM/fbdtSEnUrauea6/PitAFywz/XYDvrjcyuFSJVa o4LRp/PZ50p7YUzhKFV4TaV3g3xx5DDNq7+9liFZuYsS5GGzt/oC1YHLV+tG4gE6wFus EIAhEqlWQYEnm6sFRBJpOmPfxh5l0nkAEJBQ2+Nv1AWYxQJGd7H7JNL05dfjebxIhUVJ 6JLw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvclhEox9NUti0VyWAWu3efl3S9ghNC8saQX9SMlyZfFWzopV6aHCIPwYtYY5zYy2w==
X-Received: by 10.202.90.195 with SMTP id o186mr15968386oib.165.1478332333792; Sat, 05 Nov 2016 00:52:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.2] (wsip-184-191-158-59.sd.sd.cox.net. [184.191.158.59]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f68sm4898652otb.36.2016.11.05.00.52.12 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 05 Nov 2016 00:52:13 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3251\))
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CD6FCB8F-5A3C-4309-A784-5EFA926D1FEB@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2016 00:52:11 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <30CCBC03-BF67-4A94-A8AE-7BBFB906C350@gmail.com>
References: <E3C933A5-6141-437A-ABA9-CF881BC8149E@cooperw.in> <50f9aade-69aa-0f49-05a6-00c891f96070@dcrocker.net> <2fcf2945-094a-0041-a464-8965d0a472d2@gmail.com> <C86363C1-B427-4278-B325-C883C6DEB7D3@gmail.com> <7eb36108-79cc-a3f5-6c41-1d7e4b1b849e@gmail.com> <f7b3c9ea-de33-26d1-8f0a-3ce82860771e@dcrocker.net> <B7162C59-16C7-4885-8524-AC8BAAD3BAE7@amsl.com> <CD6FCB8F-5A3C-4309-A784-5EFA926D1FEB@gmail.com>
To: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/H0OufPKFCG1NuSvgYTXQjQQobZs>
Cc: mtgvenue@ietf.org, Laura Nugent <lnugent@amsl.com>, Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] Comments on draft-baker-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-02
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2016 07:52:15 -0000

> On Nov 2, 2016, at 6:14 AM, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Today you can usually get pretty acceptable Internet service at any random hotel and it’s usually included in the room price. The only annoyance is the captive portal. Sure, there are exceptions, but it has become enough of a non-issue that I think we can omit this from the considerations.

Not sure I would agree, at least not entirely. You’re correct that the issue has changed over time, but the consideration has been of value in some of the meetings we have planned in the past decade. I would rather leave it there and agree that it is often not a primary issue.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email