Re: [Mtgvenue] Comments on draft-baker-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-02

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 02 November 2016 13:16 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B85011293EC for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 06:16:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1LAc-Ib24APj for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 06:16:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x232.google.com (mail-qt0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13DC412951A for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 06:16:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x232.google.com with SMTP id p16so8494395qta.0 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 06:16:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=S1jsb0rdgQMfE80m99kbfJH76uTHZUTcSqdTYnhhWfM=; b=kYAaeaq5pWY38WxuXuQ+7Qa9drdS4Geg8s71AFZnf/tx/VZcrb6t9MXaA3wA5nAXH2 fwfWCpaBVWCP37g8i2v1WdoAHvbjkbT2yJgyNrZB8DGUm+YSlyXQ8I9WwuUkDRUB8mWL K6cxp0ad8uABdJA/re9tPFhd7/La9CqH4cvD+OtQz6yQqlxU0L2KnxPnlLx639VAt/yP FPJNYjKSCo7fRKMuh5UIolYIU9mGBDytLLni0miIacYQOMjIPFydHldc0hjjQQ3IFukp 76Thf43Y4Jyxem1ejv6MwHrSDGLq2HfK9TWfcmkDAymi4reAlGEYBCq+giOYh0wFdywO 39sQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=S1jsb0rdgQMfE80m99kbfJH76uTHZUTcSqdTYnhhWfM=; b=ddvL65iv0XiZWA/xAuZSZcMievRSV1wjeObxLTKBlzIV7wXKYvY4xMy5/tcDCaU7H7 32/oamGEAFuoLzbja3TAuv3jOSSdCmJDlEgpybQeYaEyMwROuKTsbgNcNp7Ziok5l3Mx xe5D/rAAAnTOSZlmgIXNdkJ37sdbUhPEpKviB5mfaQ2kiq87O384u9c6UO9e/6hPhoiF T+fJd8chQLIuqgN8dR1XKvqdvLD5HhWL2P6Pa8kTWzGie7/dqe6bgbB76ottVWy5OiAs qsrwSBxpZTZbvZScMY7PFIk1udKBIgg8BnHIL2zZ6R7G2aqANOgMfSqMhdqlvnMubEOv ioFg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvfHryTwzIB9k820+LvuCgsilAeTTO0LiGy1G9JMa5VKC2kmeO0RRATrIyLz1055ZQ==
X-Received: by 10.237.51.3 with SMTP id u3mr3227388qtd.12.1478092571116; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 06:16:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.20.146] (c-73-167-64-188.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [73.167.64.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 16sm1079897qtf.36.2016.11.02.06.16.09 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 02 Nov 2016 06:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <01BE8A88-00DD-481E-9FAE-E57AE237066D@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_343B37F4-A573-4221-AA94-2D7D2DDF25D0"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3251\))
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 09:16:08 -0400
In-Reply-To: <8819739f-f775-b808-7e9a-d99c3a847557@dcrocker.net>
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
References: <E3C933A5-6141-437A-ABA9-CF881BC8149E@cooperw.in> <50f9aade-69aa-0f49-05a6-00c891f96070@dcrocker.net> <2fcf2945-094a-0041-a464-8965d0a472d2@gmail.com> <C86363C1-B427-4278-B325-C883C6DEB7D3@gmail.com> <7eb36108-79cc-a3f5-6c41-1d7e4b1b849e@gmail.com> <f7b3c9ea-de33-26d1-8f0a-3ce82860771e@dcrocker.net> <B7162C59-16C7-4885-8524-AC8BAAD3BAE7@amsl.com> <71BAE699-8A0A-4201-B3CD-D80FFB79945A@gmail.com> <8819739f-f775-b808-7e9a-d99c3a847557@dcrocker.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/tRZeWS2aTsknKlLPWmftjuiu5lI>
Cc: mtgvenue@ietf.org, Laura Nugent <lnugent@amsl.com>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] Comments on draft-baker-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-02
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 13:16:13 -0000

On Nov 2, 2016, at 9:01 AM, Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> wrote:
>     If an area has many, smaller hotels nearby, is the convenience of getting together hurt significantly?  Why or why not?

This might be perfectly fine in the sense that it would not privilege the people who were fast enough to get reservations at the conference hotel.   But it requires a place at the venue where these meetings can happen, and sufficient hangout space at the venue that people are not retreating to their hotel rooms because there is no comfortable place to sit.   I’ve never seen a venue that had sufficient comfy seating to make this work, unfortunately.   I guess some of the auditoriums at some of the venues we’ve been to had comfy enough seating, but there’d have to be one that was extra and could be devoted to people just hanging out.

So the bottom line is that I think in practice the large central hotel is the easiest way to address this need, even though there are definitely other ways to address it.