Re: [Mtgvenue] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-14.txt

Andrew Sullivan <> Wed, 09 May 2018 20:37 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4179512D954; Wed, 9 May 2018 13:37:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.b=jfkGh9NB; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.b=AIP+MQpc
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jhENcVrbrIlc; Wed, 9 May 2018 13:37:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5B9E128954; Wed, 9 May 2018 13:37:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id F08B9BF70E; Wed, 9 May 2018 20:36:43 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=default; t=1525898203; bh=tRV7KPD+Atn9YlWcYlO3aKWRJOSYdXWUNURZla4i6xY=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=jfkGh9NBNmvvje92CRUG+xuVdeGNay36NRmcA1NuumhemFqjn/tJRR6QRNDS6HVc9 oJGSPkNgGLBNLw8QMORZCeWTUrm1ZjJI6sWKEZQ2zxT3UnPfhjQe2fR9Ykz7EDtoZH zIAsIid2yS4vzLDKRHC0ySvHnHy+gNYUrteZxAow=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VPdhD-iLmu4Y; Wed, 9 May 2018 20:36:42 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 16:36:40 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=default; t=1525898202; bh=tRV7KPD+Atn9YlWcYlO3aKWRJOSYdXWUNURZla4i6xY=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=AIP+MQpc3s06hgxmmOg7JyvMI47KHwNH6bckB2rgcYJaCzudVs2r9WfxNIFjD2nSY 0NSNpcmpVBpVVX6YuBcgCwhY4lUPcQRrSqlSZRyxfYZLhZM7bunmFmlSM94HZ98aWM B+JePtvwtgrDEwLjoJnfEu/AQTHXiVDJJ9/PKQU0=
From: Andrew Sullivan <>
To:, ietf <>
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <> <> <> <> <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <>
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-14.txt
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 20:37:16 -0000

On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 04:20:46PM -0400, Ted Lemon wrote:
> I think moulds are fine, but we want to avoid mold.

Sorry, we use different spelling dictionaries.

> was in Hiroshima, asking "are the rooms nonsmoking" didn't work either.   In
> both cases, the site evaluation process requires that someone actually go look
> at a bunch of rooms in the venue hotel and check to see that there isn't a
> problem, without first telling the hotel staff specifically what we are looking
> for, so that they don't know which rooms to steer us toward.

That is not how I interpret the language in the draft that has been
produced, so if it's what you're expecting I think it needs to be
clear.  I think your restated requirement is that the staff performing
the site vetting not only has checked for the relevant prohibitions
and designations, but also that the prohibitions and designations are
in fact enforced.  We do not have that language right now, in my

Best regards,


Andrew Sullivan