Re: [netconf] crypto-types fallback strategy

Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net> Tue, 08 October 2019 13:57 UTC

Return-Path: <0100016daba8d265-d3b2a0f3-24a6-4898-b57b-729202844650-000000@amazonses.watsen.net>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF6901200A3 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 06:57:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazonses.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l5kpTa2haMxT for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 06:57:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from a8-32.smtp-out.amazonses.com (a8-32.smtp-out.amazonses.com [54.240.8.32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 473DB12007C for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 06:57:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=6gbrjpgwjskckoa6a5zn6fwqkn67xbtw; d=amazonses.com; t=1570543031; h=From:Message-Id:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References:Feedback-ID; bh=hLMdMAV3/2rT/jfZTW2wJj36yGl6NjLUWxgkS/0rRhM=; b=G1g/fbVOW/KmLqwAWVExx2+ARTV6CiX/l8MRQ8lOOX6iNw8DB7WISkMh2/DUoEOw ImUZ5W1nXnwU/oFFSwp4T9aLVPKabes/+wH/o8CVpq8e5gfkbP81aRCrLStyEpWXpiP ybOotoovpsKycs8QXtUgOFjfqelGS7dP4OMqGkn0=
From: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
Message-ID: <0100016daba8d265-d3b2a0f3-24a6-4898-b57b-729202844650-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4CC40007-C2B7-447B-B3B3-CE0117C3DEB6"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 13:57:10 +0000
In-Reply-To: <20191008130222.5v77yqytgcxytxzc@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
Cc: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>, "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <J.Schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
References: <02f501d57846$e29a3b20$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <0100016d8834e6b1-d2301e8e-89e5-4fb1-ae58-057e82c4cf7f-000000@email.amazonses.com> <0100016da8b59883-9c9c21fa-5030-4dd5-867e-5e33bf7b379d-000000@email.amazonses.com> <20191008.122208.2297815182441890483.mbj@tail-f.com> <20191008130222.5v77yqytgcxytxzc@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-SES-Outgoing: 2019.10.08-54.240.8.32
Feedback-ID: 1.us-east-1.DKmIRZFhhsBhtmFMNikgwZUWVrODEw9qVcPhqJEI2DA=:AmazonSES
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/-KuQN0eLgbad5Q9ZSaes8tTeXnQ>
Subject: Re: [netconf] crypto-types fallback strategy
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 13:57:34 -0000

>> Note that in general, a server may support one set of algs for node A
>> and another set of algs for node B.  So just listing the supported set
>> of identities is not sufficient.   Which is why I suggest (again) that
>> we don't try to solve this problem here and now.
>> 
> 
> We either solve the problem or we have to accept the people create
> workarounds. It is no solution to say "we do this next year" over and
> over again. And yes, the number of config false lists you need depends
> on the number of config knobs.

Right, it doesn't help to pretend that implementing a module != supporting all identities in the module.

Kent