Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying prefix delegation for Proxy Mobile IPv6?
Jong-Hyouk Lee <jong-hyouk.lee@inria.fr> Thu, 11 August 2011 13:50 UTC
Return-Path: <jong-hyouk.lee@inria.fr>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94A5921F8AFA for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 06:50:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.626
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.626 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zkhi0LUuMw6n for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 06:50:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05C5421F8AF8 for <netext@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 06:50:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,355,1309730400"; d="scan'208";a="115594124"
Received: from mail-vx0-f172.google.com ([209.85.220.172]) by mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 11 Aug 2011 15:50:40 +0200
Received: by vxi29 with SMTP id 29so2056419vxi.31 for <netext@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 06:50:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.23.2 with SMTP id i2mr10162347vdf.412.1313070639320; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 06:50:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.181.100 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 06:50:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <05C81A773E48DD49B181B04BA21A342A263F1185D8@HE113484.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
References: <CA686394.1CF0F%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com> <05C81A773E48DD49B181B04BA21A342A263F1185D8@HE113484.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
From: Jong-Hyouk Lee <jong-hyouk.lee@inria.fr>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 15:50:19 +0200
Message-ID: <CABk4tj9hoN2Swj7uL0_SSix5nVrUO946uDHQrh3pv6fHTTeRyg@mail.gmail.com>
To: zhou.xingyue@zte.com.cn
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf307d024c058f4e04aa3b155c"
Cc: netext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying prefix delegation for Proxy Mobile IPv6?
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 13:50:09 -0000
Q1: Yes. Q2: Yes. Comments: As pointed, the use cases should be provided and personally I would like to introduce the following articles recently published: 1. Lightweight NEtwork MObility within PMIPv6 for Transportation Systems", IEEE Systems Journal: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2011.2158681 2. Performance Analysis of PMIPv6 based NEtwork MObility for Intelligent Transportation Systems", IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2011.2157949 Cheers. On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 2:08 PM, <Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de> wrote: > Q1: Yes > Q2: Yes > Comment: please provide more details on the use case in WG I-D, e.g. the > phrase > 'It assumes that a MR [i.e. Mobile Router] is a regular IPv6 router without > extension for mobility managements.' sounds a bit strange to me ... > > Thanks! > > Regards > Dirk > > > [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying prefix delegation for Proxy > Mobile IPv6? > > > At IETF81, Carl Williams presented the I-D: "Prefix Delegation for > Proxy Mobile IPv6" <draft-zhou-netext-pd-pmip-01.txt> > > General consensus at the Netext WG meeting was that prefix delegation > is a required feature for PMIP6. We gauged the interest in the room to > adopt this I-D as the starting point of a WG I-D for the PD feature > and observed the following: > > " > Chairs: how many people think the problem is relevant: 19 > How many have read it: 7 > How many think that the proposed solution in the draft can be starting > point to work on the problem? > In favor: 7 ; Opposed: 1 > " > > We are now following up with the questions on the ML. > > Question to WG: > > 1. Should the WG specify prefix-delegation support for PMIP6? > > Yes [ ] > No [ ] > > 2. Can we adopt as WG document the solution proposed in I-D: > draft-zhou-netext-pd-pmip-01.txt as the starting point of this > feature? > > Yes [ ] > No [ ] > > Please respond by August 18th on the ML. > > -Chairs > > Please see the discussion at the IETF81 WG meeting on this topic at: > http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/81/minutes/netext.txt > > > _______________________________________________ > netext mailing list > netext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext > _______________________________________________ > netext mailing list > netext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext > -- IMARA Team, INRIA, France. Jong-Hyouk Lee, living somewhere between /dev/null and /dev/random. #email: hurryon (at) gmail (dot) com || jong-hyouk.lee (at) inria (dot) fr #webpage: https://sites.google.com/site/hurryon/
- [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying prefi… Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… Jouni
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… Sri Gundavelli
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… zhou.xingyue
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… zhu.chunhui
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… Jiang Dong
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… Dirk.von-Hugo
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… Jong-Hyouk Lee
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… Hidetoshi Yokota
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… 马骁
- [netext] 答复: Re: Consensus call: Work on specifyi… zhou.xingyue
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… jonne.soininen
- Re: [netext] 答复: Re: Consensus call: Work on spec… Jong-Hyouk Lee
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… liu dapeng
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… Hui Deng
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… Sri Gundavelli
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… Sri Gundavelli
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… Jong-Hyouk Lee
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… Jouni
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [netext] 答复: Re: Consensus call: Work on spec… Daniel Migault
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… jouni korhonen
- Re: [netext] Consensus call: Work on specifying p… Alexandru Petrescu