IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ?

"Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com> Tue, 21 October 2014 23:59 UTC

Return-Path: <evoit@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C7E01A8844 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 16:59:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5If9EGF6_iJs for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 16:59:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E81C41A883D for <netmod@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 16:59:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=16064; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1413935980; x=1415145580; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=sid0QZHJ+Cj+dR4+jgjPo48BwPVP7UctYyAUnX3s+wc=; b=MveGDoSCvYfI9s/HJSbGXVRJj/i653XnxALPXv9qPcaijaXQ2klgLE2v +mv6WRcWYCqQH+SrZN3I0yWrtcCZaSYOowGSeDViGYTmL5jNBn6V/Hw7l HEpL/SHKimFwif5fxXanedqn2uggBn9q+xblK2R/mQKxBorxv8OsBKjgD M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: An8FAJjyRlStJA2B/2dsb2JhbABcgkhGU1gEgwK5So5IgWYBC4Z3VAIbeBYBfYQCAQEBAgIBAQEgCkEbAgEIEQEDAQELHQMCAgIlCxQDBggCBAESCAGINg2xPpR2AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBF5AmLQoBgnc2gR4FkgGERohDPIMMkS2DeGwBgUeBAwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,765,1406592000"; d="scan'208,217";a="365266943"
Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 Oct 2014 23:59:39 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com [173.37.183.86]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9LNxdMl024627 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 21 Oct 2014 23:59:39 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x11.cisco.com ([169.254.6.189]) by xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com ([173.37.183.86]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 18:59:38 -0500
From: "Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com>
To: "Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ?
Thread-Index: AQHP7Xb3DvWoTPdbPEqKhstsfCTVD5w7Lt2g
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 23:59:38 +0000
Message-ID: <EF64FF31F4C4384DBCE5D513A791C2B120A55E7A@xmb-aln-x11.cisco.com>
References: <A125E53CE190A749957C19483DC79F9F5C977E5A@US70TWXCHMBA11.zam.alcatel-lucent.com> <D8D374DB-32C6-4725-AD1B-D4E1B23BC966@lucidvision.com>
In-Reply-To: <D8D374DB-32C6-4725-AD1B-D4E1B23BC966@lucidvision.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.116.134.135]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_EF64FF31F4C4384DBCE5D513A791C2B120A55E7Axmbalnx11ciscoc_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/--Doqyxxn571D7BfYm2dS2QN_m0
Subject: Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ?
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 23:59:42 -0000

I would like to talk about
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-voit-netmod-peer-mount-requirements/

We chatted about this document in an Interim call two weeks ago.  The intro PPT is here<http://www.voit.org/Peer-Mount-Netconf-WG-Oct2014.pdf>.  A result of the call was that we had a wide ranging alias discussions.  A review in Hawaii would allow a recap/summary of mailing list discussions, as well as an introduction to the concepts to other participants.

Note that several discussions came out of the call.  Each has implications to possible charters across various IETF WG.  Worthy of discussion are:

- RFC 6244 defines a single-box architecture.  YANG syntax is used for multi-device abstractions in the OpenDaylight controller.  Should the IETF consider architectures where YANG models span devices?

- RFC 5277 on Netconf notifications doesn’t include information on how to handle Pub/Sub.  There is also some demand for Pub/Sub which is tied to YANG with no required linkage to a transport protocol.  There are also needs for Pub/Sub beyond YANG.  How should we approach this area?

Eric

From: netmod [mailto:netmod-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Thomas D. Nadeau
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2014 5:34 PM
To: Sterne, Jason (Jason)
Cc: netmod@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ?


          Not yet. Please propose topics.

          —Tom


On Oct 21, 2014:5:32 PM, at 5:32 PM, Sterne, Jason (Jason) <jason.sterne@alcatel-lucent.com<mailto:jason.sterne@alcatel-lucent.com>> wrote:

Hi all,

Is there a preliminary agenda for the two NETMOD sessions at IETF91 ?

Some thought about topics being split between the 1st (longer) and 2nd (shorter) sessions ?

Thanks,
Jason

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email