Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ?

Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Tue, 04 November 2014 23:26 UTC

Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E79921A19EE for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 15:26:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EZome7t3fsdJ for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 15:26:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qa0-x233.google.com (mail-qa0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85F661A0636 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 15:26:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id f12so10805673qad.10 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Nov 2014 15:26:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-type; bh=WpVrLDR3Uupmgs6MlBmlJkcIUlh9KWC83BP4z319oos=; b=HZ2Q0EMeYYpwyM0zus2TvPkbCbsfoUD/iDl8wjHsms2oUY3ZYL07JaLIARNkI1hlZM 3lR6nCs6RAOD26QqBa/gfxqKTAtyY1BWMEJrmXc71hPdAOVeMjpXFfHsSpezu/4okimc Q3UgvstHGEUjZcLSelZkHW4+ljLPCgJ3xUBQH74VJp4EqiFB/5NFz23K5MQ1ssvhsc+n NdsOdTcyVVP0Mm37veLOQF4W9DB511XdemknlzDxXTUUVspBwuV1QNODidNsww923MUL TCeGm6VdqoJHTJbF1gTUgkxzapFiZjCN7b49m0/frEVKyl3ITaf5AKyIn2PbP5s7jWi3 NQjg==
X-Received: by 10.140.108.182 with SMTP id j51mr77806488qgf.27.1415143566603; Tue, 04 Nov 2014 15:26:06 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <A125E53CE190A749957C19483DC79F9F5C977E5A@US70TWXCHMBA11.zam.alcatel-lucent.com> <D8D374DB-32C6-4725-AD1B-D4E1B23BC966@lucidvision.com> <CABCOCHSoDxZfzA0dnviB2yV8GbdqmUrGmJXsFxMy8_7MpG7W+w@mail.gmail.com> <79054E89-2D09-4461-8D35-8F6FA025B71F@nic.cz> <43060BE7-53EA-4B9D-B778-2FED58C0D60C@lucidvision.com> <52AE09CB-D4AB-4421-BBA4-1D9C45EA6957@gmail.com> <54590195.3010903@cisco.com> <CAAchPMtcvd3xb9xCGEBHqTZg8G-Fg76z8T2Wi1QLHoS=W_fiag@mail.gmail.com> <54595361.5000907@cisco.com>
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 23:26:06 +0000
Message-ID: <CAAchPMur4_mhPDfArquFYmUYefdfGr=x0+yOfKWqdTq-c_hhKQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, "Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113a54a497fda1050710c9dd"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/wmR8cYOebFYejPEMj8trwxcsg0o
Cc: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>, "rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org" <rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ?
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 23:26:12 -0000

Benoit,

The suggestion came from Jason on having the design teams do the update and
the WG seemed to agree. I understand and 'am ok with the fact that it
probably does not make sense for the update to happen in NETMOD itself.

For anyone who is still interested, they can plan to attend BFD WG where it
will be presented.

One item that might be useful:



-          “Design Teams” update:

o   List of all known “design teams” that are working on YANG models
(especially ones that may be progressing outside of the IETF mailing lists)

o   Ideally a brief status update from one of the primary
leaders/contributors (i.e. a few bullet points / 1-2 minutes) for each one
(not to discuss the technical details of specific models – that could be
other agenda items)



Regards,

Jason

On Tue Nov 04 2014 at 2:29:55 PM Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> wrote:

>  Mahesh,
>
> Benoit,
>
> I was going to give a quick update on the BFD YANG model, which is being
> presented/discussed in its own WG.
>
> I wonder which ideal outcome you want a presentation in the NETMOD WG?
>
> Here's the list of drafts that have normative or unclassified references
> to YANG:
>
> draft-vanderstok-core-comi-05                     2014-10-27  Active
> draft-shi-alto-yang-json-00                       2014-10-27  Active
> draft-shi-alto-yang-model-00                      2014-10-27  Active
> draft-netmod-clemm-datastore-push-00              2014-10-27  Active
> draft-wildes-netmod-syslog-model-05               2014-10-27  Active
> draft-zhang-nvo3-yang-active-active-cfg-00        2014-10-27  Active
> draft-zaalouk-supa-configuration-model-01         2014-10-27  Active
> draft-wang-lime-rpc-yang-oam-management-00        2014-10-27  Active
> draft-vergara-flexigrid-yang-00                   2014-10-27  Active
> draft-gandhi-mpls-te-yang-model-01                2014-10-27  Active
> draft-txh-opsawg-lime-gap-analysis-01             2014-10-27  Active
> draft-zheng-netmod-xmi-yang-translation-00        2014-10-27  Active
> draft-chen-i2rs-mpls-ldp-info-model-00            2014-10-27  Active
> draft-tripathy-cloud-sla-yang-model-00            2014-10-27  Active
> draft-clemm-i2rs-yang-l3-topo-00                  2014-10-27  Active
> draft-contreras-supa-yang-network-topo-01         2014-10-27  Active
> draft-wang-yang-bfd-oam-00                        2014-10-27  Active
> draft-ietf-netconf-server-model-04                2014-10-26  Active
> draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-01                  2014-10-26  Active
> draft-shen-l2tpext-l2tpv3-yang-model-00           2014-10-26  Active
> draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-16                  2014-10-26  Active
> draft-shaikh-idr-bgp-model-00                     2014-10-26  Active
> draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-03                    2014-10-25  Active
> draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-01                        2014-10-25  Active
> draft-sarikaya-dmm-for-wifi-01                    2014-10-24  Active
> draft-voit-netmod-peer-mount-requirements-01      2014-10-24  Active
> draft-shi-model-json-msg-yang-00                  2014-10-24  Active
> draft-liu-pim-igmp-mld-yang-00                    2014-10-23  Active
> draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-01                   2014-10-23  Active
> draft-liu-pim-yang-00                             2014-10-23  Active
> draft-asechoud-netmod-diffserv-model-00           2014-10-22  Active
> draft-dong-i2rs-l2-network-topology-00            2014-10-21  Active
> draft-bierman-netconf-efficiency-extensions-02    2014-10-21  Active
> draft-zhang-nvo3-yang-cfg-00                      2014-10-21  Active
> draft-sun-softwire-yang-00                        2014-10-20  Active
> draft-yeung-netmod-ospf-02                        2014-10-14  Active
> draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-01                    2014-10-13  Active
> draft-clemm-i2rs-yang-network-topo-01             2014-10-10  Active
> draft-ietf-netconf-call-home-01                   2014-10-10  Active
> draft-bogdanovic-netmod-acl-model-02              2014-10-08  Active
> draft-clemm-netmod-mount-02                       2014-10-07  Active
> draft-zhdankin-netmod-bgp-cfg-01                  2014-10-02  Active
> draft-wang-i2rs-ospf-dm-00                        2014-09-26  Active
> draft-bhuvan-bmwg-of-controller-benchmarking-01   2014-09-25  Active
> draft-zhang-mpls-tp-yang-oam-00                   2014-09-25  Active
> draft-bierman-netmod-yang-conformance-04          2014-09-24  Active
> draft-ietf-netmod-snmp-cfg-08                     2014-09-18  In IESG
> processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>
> draft-frank-netconf-conformance-00                2014-09-16  Active
> draft-haas-i2rs-netmod-netconf-requirements-00    2014-09-12  Active
> draft-lhotka-netmod-yang-metadata-00              2014-09-11  Active
> draft-schoenw-lmap-yang-01                        2014-09-02  Active
> draft-zhuang-l2vpn-yang-cfg-00                    2014-08-24  Active
> draft-zhuang-l2vpn-evpn-yang-cfg-00               2014-08-16  Active
> draft-chen-mpls-ldp-yang-cfg-00                   2014-08-15  Active
> draft-chen-mpls-te-yang-cfg-00                    2014-08-15  Active
> draft-zhuang-l3vpn-yang-cfg-00                    2014-08-15  Active
> draft-scharf-alto-yang-00                         2014-07-04  Active
> draft-yang-netmod-location-00                     2014-07-04  Active
> draft-fang-l3vpn-virtual-pe-05                    2014-07-04  Active
> draft-mekking-dnsop-kasp-00                       2014-07-04  Active
> draft-xjz-opsawg-nfvmodel-00                      2014-07-04  Active
> draft-liu-netmod-yang-abstract-topo-00            2014-07-03  Active
> draft-ietf-netconf-yang-patch-01                  2014-07-03  Active
> draft-zheng-netmod-integrate-operations-00        2014-07-02  Active
> draft-liu-netconf-multi-instances-00              2014-07-02  Active
> draft-litkowski-isis-yang-isis-cfg-01             2014-06-27  Active
> draft-litkowski-netmod-isis-cfg-00                2014-06-17  Active
> draft-lonvick-private-tax-08                      2014-06-09  Active
> draft-tp-i2rs-yang-00                             2014-05-08  Active
>
> That could be a lot of updates...
> I believe we should focus on the YANG models that don't have an existing
> WG.
>
> Reminder: A good avenue for any YANG models is
> http://www.ietf.org/meeting/91/tutorials/yang-session.html
>
> Regards, Benoit
>
>
>
>
> On Tue Nov 04 2014 at 8:40:55 AM Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> wrote:
>
>>  Mahesh,
>>
>> Not sure what exactly you want to present but let me draw your attention
>> that the routing-related modules should be taken care of in their
>> respective WG. See
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-yang-coord/current/msg00094.html
>>
>> Regards, Benoit
>>
>> Tom,
>>
>>  I am giving an update on the BFD YANG model in the BFD WG. I can give a
>> quick update (~1-2min) in NETMOD if such an update is desired.
>>
>> *Mahesh Jethanandani*
>> mjethanandani@gmail.com
>>
>> On Oct 23, 2014, at 1:43 PM, "Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>     We have plenty of runway in the agenda right now so I will put it
>> down as two items. We reserved two slots because I feel its important to
>> encourage discussion during the face2face meetings so insofar as I can, I
>> want to give you enough runway to discuss this in detail.
>>
>>     --Tom
>>
>>
>> On Oct 23, 2014:12:13 PM, at 12:13 PM, Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>  Hi,
>>
>>
>>  apart from the two WG items draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-16 (to be
>> submitted) and draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-01, I’d like to discuss the
>> draft and draft-lhotka-netmod-yang-metadata-00. I think 5 minutes would be
>> enough for the latter, I could even do it together with yang-json.
>>
>>
>>  Thanks, Lada
>>
>>
>>  On 23 Oct 2014, at 18:02, Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>   On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Thomas D. Nadeau <
>> tnadeau@lucidvision.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>      Not yet. Please propose topics.
>>
>>
>>
>>   I would like 15 min. to discuss YANG conformance issues, specified in
>> this draft:
>>
>>  http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-bierman-netmod-yang-conformance-04.txt
>>
>>
>>   These issues may get resolved in the NETCONF YANG 1.1 virtual interim
>>
>>  meeting next week. If not, this topic should be discussed at the IETF
>> meeting.
>>
>>
>>
>>      —Tom
>>
>>
>>   Andy
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>   On Oct 21, 2014:5:32 PM, at 5:32 PM, Sterne, Jason (Jason) <
>> jason.sterne@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>    Hi all,
>>
>>
>>    Is there a preliminary agenda for the two NETMOD sessions at IETF91 ?
>>
>>
>>
>>    Some thought about topics being split between the 1st (longer) and
>> 2nd (shorter) sessions ?
>>
>>
>>    Thanks,
>>
>>   Jason
>>
>>
>>    _______________________________________________
>>
>>   netmod mailing list
>>
>>   netmod@ietf.org
>>
>>   https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>>
>>
>>
>>   _______________________________________________
>>
>>  netmod mailing list
>>
>>  netmod@ietf.org
>>
>>  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>>
>>
>>
>>   _______________________________________________
>>
>>  netmod mailing list
>>
>>  netmod@ietf.org
>>
>>  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>>
>>
>>  --
>>
>> Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs
>>
>> PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> netmod mailing list
>> netmod@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> netmod mailing listnetmod@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>>
>>
>>
>