Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ?
"Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@lucidvision.com> Mon, 27 October 2014 17:41 UTC
Return-Path: <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42C5C1A802A for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 10:41:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fwduspSQqbI3 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 10:41:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lucidvision.com (lucidvision.com [72.71.250.34]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BEAF1A7D85 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 10:41:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.123] (static-72-71-250-38.cncdnh.fast04.myfairpoint.net [72.71.250.38]) by lucidvision.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9680028DC321; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 13:41:45 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.0 \(1990.1\))
From: "Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
In-Reply-To: <D06FCD2F.140AA1%yihuan@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 13:41:45 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <06900899-7561-468C-A38A-CC95F1777FCE@lucidvision.com>
References: <D06FCD2F.140AA1%yihuan@cisco.com>
To: "Lisa Huang (yihuan)" <yihuan@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1990.1)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/rKXw6UMI1p1iJVKEPHEfApjRTq4
Cc: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ?
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 17:41:49 -0000
Yes. The idea is to discuss as part of the slot. --tom > On Oct 27, 2014:1:20 PM, at 1:20 PM, Lisa Huang (yihuan) <yihuan@cisco.com> wrote: > > Tom, > > Is it possible to allocate each time slot to include both presentation > time and discussion time in agenda? Thanks, > > Lisa > > On 10/23/14, 12:26 PM, "Dana Blair (dblair)" <dblair@cisco.com> wrote: > >> Need about 10 minutes to discuss the ACL Yang draft >> >> thanks, >> Dana >> >> On 10/23/14, 1:43 PM, "Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@lucidvision.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> We have plenty of runway in the agenda right now so I will put it down >>> as two items. We reserved two slots because I feel its important to >>> encourage discussion during the face2face meetings so insofar as I can, I >>> want to give you enough runway to discuss this in detail. >>> >>> --Tom >>> >>> >>>> On Oct 23, 2014:12:13 PM, at 12:13 PM, Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> apart from the two WG items draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-16 (to be >>>> submitted) and draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-01, I¹d like to discuss the >>>> draft and draft-lhotka-netmod-yang-metadata-00. I think 5 minutes would >>>> be enough for the latter, I could even do it together with yang-json. >>>> >>>> Thanks, Lada >>>> >>>> On 23 Oct 2014, at 18:02, Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Thomas D. Nadeau >>>>> <tnadeau@lucidvision.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Not yet. Please propose topics. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I would like 15 min. to discuss YANG conformance issues, specified in >>>>> this draft: >>>>> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-bierman-netmod-yang-conformance-04.txt >>>>> >>>>> These issues may get resolved in the NETCONF YANG 1.1 virtual interim >>>>> meeting next week. If not, this topic should be discussed at the IETF >>>>> meeting. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ‹Tom >>>>> >>>>> Andy >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Oct 21, 2014:5:32 PM, at 5:32 PM, Sterne, Jason (Jason) >>>>>> <jason.sterne@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> Is there a preliminary agenda for the two NETMOD sessions at IETF91 ? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Some thought about topics being split between the 1st (longer) and >>>>>> 2nd (shorter) sessions ? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Jason >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> netmod mailing list >>>>>> netmod@ietf.org >>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> netmod mailing list >>>>> netmod@ietf.org >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> netmod mailing list >>>>> netmod@ietf.org >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs >>>> PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> netmod mailing list >>> netmod@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >> >> _______________________________________________ >> netmod mailing list >> netmod@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Thomas D. Nadeau
- [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Sterne, Jason (Jason)
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Eric Voit (evoit)
- [netmod] FW: IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Eric Voit (evoit)
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Sterne, Jason (Jason)
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Thomas D. Nadeau
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Sterne, Jason (Jason)
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Thomas D. Nadeau
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Thomas D. Nadeau
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Dana Blair (dblair)
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Lisa Huang (yihuan)
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Thomas D. Nadeau
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Thomas D. Nadeau
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Benoit Claise
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Benoit Claise
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Randy Presuhn
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Benoit Claise
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Benoit Claise
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Sterne, Jason (Jason)
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Balazs Lengyel
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Dean Bogdanovic
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Balazs Lengyel
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Dean Bogdanovic
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? t.petch
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? t.petch
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Andy Bierman