Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ?

"Sterne, Jason (Jason)" <jason.sterne@alcatel-lucent.com> Wed, 05 November 2014 14:18 UTC

Return-Path: <jason.sterne@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 364371A8914 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 06:18:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.494
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.494 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wN_AbzO_1dlq for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 06:18:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpgre-esg-01.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDBD61A890E for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 06:18:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from us70tusmtp1.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.5.2.63]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id A48F37E7B98CE; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 14:18:05 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from US70UWXCHHUB01.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (us70uwxchhub01.zam.alcatel-lucent.com [135.5.2.48]) by us70tusmtp1.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id sA5EI0sq018051 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 5 Nov 2014 09:18:06 -0500
Received: from US70TWXCHMBA11.zam.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.5.170]) by US70UWXCHHUB01.zam.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.5.2.48]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 09:18:04 -0500
From: "Sterne, Jason (Jason)" <jason.sterne@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>, "Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>, "rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org" <rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ?
Thread-Index: AQHP+ISY9o+fzD3eUU6cqdjJyOjffpxSEygQ
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 14:18:04 +0000
Message-ID: <A125E53CE190A749957C19483DC79F9F5C9823E3@US70TWXCHMBA11.zam.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <A125E53CE190A749957C19483DC79F9F5C977E5A@US70TWXCHMBA11.zam.alcatel-lucent.com> <D8D374DB-32C6-4725-AD1B-D4E1B23BC966@lucidvision.com> <CABCOCHSoDxZfzA0dnviB2yV8GbdqmUrGmJXsFxMy8_7MpG7W+w@mail.gmail.com> <79054E89-2D09-4461-8D35-8F6FA025B71F@nic.cz> <43060BE7-53EA-4B9D-B778-2FED58C0D60C@lucidvision.com> <52AE09CB-D4AB-4421-BBA4-1D9C45EA6957@gmail.com> <54590195.3010903@cisco.com> <CAAchPMtcvd3xb9xCGEBHqTZg8G-Fg76z8T2Wi1QLHoS=W_fiag@mail.gmail.com> <20141104224854.GA20782@elstar.local> <54595CEC.9010102@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <54595CEC.9010102@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.5.27.17]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/MgWhwfGWD-ibmLqMjVdx-5fH7i4
Subject: Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ?
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 14:18:13 -0000

Hi guys,

+1 although trying to track a current list of models may be a lot of work and since I'm not volunteering to do it I'm not sure I can really ask someone else to :-)

Jason 


-----Original Message-----
From: netmod [mailto:netmod-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Benoit Claise
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2014 6:11 PM
To: Mahesh Jethanandani; Thomas D. Nadeau; netmod@ietf.org; rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ?

Hi Jürgen,

I like this idea.

Regards, Benoit
> Hi,
>
> perhaps Tom can help compiling an overview which data model is 
> discussed in (or proposed to) which working group and then we do not 
> need individuals to step up and show a slide or two. With ~60 data 
> models submitted to this IETF, this stepping up to the mike to say 2-3 
> sentences alone would at least take an hour of meeting time.
>
> I am thinking about something as simple like the list below (organized 
> by WG with markers to indicate [WG] working group documents and [IS] 
> individual submissions).
>
> * NETCONF
>
>    - NETCONF Server Configuration Model [WG]
>      https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-server-model-04
>
>    - ...
>
> * NETMOD
>
>    - A YANG Data Model for Routing Management [WG]
>      https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-16
>
>    - Network Access Control List (ACL) YANG Data Model [WG]
>      https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bogdanovic-netmod-acl-model-02
>
>    - SYSLOG YANG model [WG]
>      https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wildes-netmod-syslog-model-05
>
>    - Defining and Using Metadata with YANG [IS]
>      https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lhotka-netmod-yang-metadata-00
>
>    - ...
>
> * ...
>
> Having such an overview recorded on the slides and hence in the 
> proceedings will be useful. If we manage to compile such a list even 
> before the meeting starts on the mailing list (that is by Sunday), 
> then this list can also serve as a guide where to go to discuss the 
> various YANG data modeling contributions.
>
> /js
>
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 10:16:27PM +0000, Mahesh Jethanandani wrote:
>> Benoit,
>>
>> I was going to give a quick update on the BFD YANG model, which is 
>> being presented/discussed in its own WG.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue Nov 04 2014 at 8:40:55 AM Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> wrote:
>>
>>>   Mahesh,
>>>
>>> Not sure what exactly you want to present but let me draw your 
>>> attention that the routing-related modules should be taken care of 
>>> in their respective WG. See 
>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-yang-coord/current/msg00094
>>> .html
>>>
>>> Regards, Benoit
>>>
>>> Tom,
>>>
>>>   I am giving an update on the BFD YANG model in the BFD WG. I can 
>>> give a quick update (~1-2min) in NETMOD if such an update is desired.
>>>
>>> *Mahesh Jethanandani*
>>> mjethanandani@gmail.com
>>>
>>> On Oct 23, 2014, at 1:43 PM, "Thomas D. Nadeau" 
>>> <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>      We have plenty of runway in the agenda right now so I will put 
>>> it down as two items. We reserved two slots because I feel its 
>>> important to encourage discussion during the face2face meetings so 
>>> insofar as I can, I want to give you enough runway to discuss this in detail.
>>>
>>>      --Tom
>>>
>>>
>>> On Oct 23, 2014:12:13 PM, at 12:13 PM, Ladislav Lhotka 
>>> <lhotka@nic.cz>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>   Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>>   apart from the two WG items draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-16 (to 
>>> be
>>> submitted) and draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-01, I’d like to discuss 
>>> the draft and draft-lhotka-netmod-yang-metadata-00. I think 5 
>>> minutes would be enough for the latter, I could even do it together with yang-json.
>>>
>>>
>>>   Thanks, Lada
>>>
>>>
>>>   On 23 Oct 2014, at 18:02, Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Thomas D. Nadeau < 
>>> tnadeau@lucidvision.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>       Not yet. Please propose topics.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    I would like 15 min. to discuss YANG conformance issues, 
>>> specified in this draft:
>>>
>>>   
>>> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-bierman-netmod-yang-conformance-04.txt
>>>
>>>
>>>    These issues may get resolved in the NETCONF YANG 1.1 virtual 
>>> interim
>>>
>>>   meeting next week. If not, this topic should be discussed at the 
>>> IETF meeting.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>       —Tom
>>>
>>>
>>>    Andy
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    On Oct 21, 2014:5:32 PM, at 5:32 PM, Sterne, Jason (Jason) < 
>>> jason.sterne@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>     Hi all,
>>>
>>>
>>>     Is there a preliminary agenda for the two NETMOD sessions at IETF91 ?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     Some thought about topics being split between the 1st (longer) 
>>> and 2nd
>>> (shorter) sessions ?
>>>
>>>
>>>     Thanks,
>>>
>>>    Jason
>>>
>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>
>>>    netmod mailing list
>>>
>>>    netmod@ietf.org
>>>
>>>    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    _______________________________________________
>>>
>>>   netmod mailing list
>>>
>>>   netmod@ietf.org
>>>
>>>   https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    _______________________________________________
>>>
>>>   netmod mailing list
>>>
>>>   netmod@ietf.org
>>>
>>>   https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>>>
>>>
>>>   --
>>>
>>> Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs
>>>
>>> PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> netmod mailing list
>>> netmod@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> netmod mailing 
>>> listnetmod@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> netmod mailing list
>> netmod@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod