Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ?
"Sterne, Jason (Jason)" <jason.sterne@alcatel-lucent.com> Wed, 05 November 2014 14:18 UTC
Return-Path: <jason.sterne@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 364371A8914 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 06:18:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.494
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.494 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wN_AbzO_1dlq for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 06:18:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpgre-esg-01.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDBD61A890E for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 06:18:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from us70tusmtp1.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.5.2.63]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id A48F37E7B98CE; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 14:18:05 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from US70UWXCHHUB01.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (us70uwxchhub01.zam.alcatel-lucent.com [135.5.2.48]) by us70tusmtp1.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id sA5EI0sq018051 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 5 Nov 2014 09:18:06 -0500
Received: from US70TWXCHMBA11.zam.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.5.170]) by US70UWXCHHUB01.zam.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.5.2.48]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 09:18:04 -0500
From: "Sterne, Jason (Jason)" <jason.sterne@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>, "Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>, "rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org" <rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ?
Thread-Index: AQHP+ISY9o+fzD3eUU6cqdjJyOjffpxSEygQ
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 14:18:04 +0000
Message-ID: <A125E53CE190A749957C19483DC79F9F5C9823E3@US70TWXCHMBA11.zam.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <A125E53CE190A749957C19483DC79F9F5C977E5A@US70TWXCHMBA11.zam.alcatel-lucent.com> <D8D374DB-32C6-4725-AD1B-D4E1B23BC966@lucidvision.com> <CABCOCHSoDxZfzA0dnviB2yV8GbdqmUrGmJXsFxMy8_7MpG7W+w@mail.gmail.com> <79054E89-2D09-4461-8D35-8F6FA025B71F@nic.cz> <43060BE7-53EA-4B9D-B778-2FED58C0D60C@lucidvision.com> <52AE09CB-D4AB-4421-BBA4-1D9C45EA6957@gmail.com> <54590195.3010903@cisco.com> <CAAchPMtcvd3xb9xCGEBHqTZg8G-Fg76z8T2Wi1QLHoS=W_fiag@mail.gmail.com> <20141104224854.GA20782@elstar.local> <54595CEC.9010102@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <54595CEC.9010102@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.5.27.17]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/MgWhwfGWD-ibmLqMjVdx-5fH7i4
Subject: Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ?
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 14:18:13 -0000
Hi guys, +1 although trying to track a current list of models may be a lot of work and since I'm not volunteering to do it I'm not sure I can really ask someone else to :-) Jason -----Original Message----- From: netmod [mailto:netmod-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Benoit Claise Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2014 6:11 PM To: Mahesh Jethanandani; Thomas D. Nadeau; netmod@ietf.org; rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org Subject: Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Hi Jürgen, I like this idea. Regards, Benoit > Hi, > > perhaps Tom can help compiling an overview which data model is > discussed in (or proposed to) which working group and then we do not > need individuals to step up and show a slide or two. With ~60 data > models submitted to this IETF, this stepping up to the mike to say 2-3 > sentences alone would at least take an hour of meeting time. > > I am thinking about something as simple like the list below (organized > by WG with markers to indicate [WG] working group documents and [IS] > individual submissions). > > * NETCONF > > - NETCONF Server Configuration Model [WG] > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-server-model-04 > > - ... > > * NETMOD > > - A YANG Data Model for Routing Management [WG] > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-16 > > - Network Access Control List (ACL) YANG Data Model [WG] > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bogdanovic-netmod-acl-model-02 > > - SYSLOG YANG model [WG] > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wildes-netmod-syslog-model-05 > > - Defining and Using Metadata with YANG [IS] > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lhotka-netmod-yang-metadata-00 > > - ... > > * ... > > Having such an overview recorded on the slides and hence in the > proceedings will be useful. If we manage to compile such a list even > before the meeting starts on the mailing list (that is by Sunday), > then this list can also serve as a guide where to go to discuss the > various YANG data modeling contributions. > > /js > > On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 10:16:27PM +0000, Mahesh Jethanandani wrote: >> Benoit, >> >> I was going to give a quick update on the BFD YANG model, which is >> being presented/discussed in its own WG. >> >> >> >> On Tue Nov 04 2014 at 8:40:55 AM Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> wrote: >> >>> Mahesh, >>> >>> Not sure what exactly you want to present but let me draw your >>> attention that the routing-related modules should be taken care of >>> in their respective WG. See >>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-yang-coord/current/msg00094 >>> .html >>> >>> Regards, Benoit >>> >>> Tom, >>> >>> I am giving an update on the BFD YANG model in the BFD WG. I can >>> give a quick update (~1-2min) in NETMOD if such an update is desired. >>> >>> *Mahesh Jethanandani* >>> mjethanandani@gmail.com >>> >>> On Oct 23, 2014, at 1:43 PM, "Thomas D. Nadeau" >>> <tnadeau@lucidvision.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> We have plenty of runway in the agenda right now so I will put >>> it down as two items. We reserved two slots because I feel its >>> important to encourage discussion during the face2face meetings so >>> insofar as I can, I want to give you enough runway to discuss this in detail. >>> >>> --Tom >>> >>> >>> On Oct 23, 2014:12:13 PM, at 12:13 PM, Ladislav Lhotka >>> <lhotka@nic.cz> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> apart from the two WG items draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-16 (to >>> be >>> submitted) and draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-01, I’d like to discuss >>> the draft and draft-lhotka-netmod-yang-metadata-00. I think 5 >>> minutes would be enough for the latter, I could even do it together with yang-json. >>> >>> >>> Thanks, Lada >>> >>> >>> On 23 Oct 2014, at 18:02, Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Thomas D. Nadeau < >>> tnadeau@lucidvision.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Not yet. Please propose topics. >>> >>> >>> >>> I would like 15 min. to discuss YANG conformance issues, >>> specified in this draft: >>> >>> >>> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-bierman-netmod-yang-conformance-04.txt >>> >>> >>> These issues may get resolved in the NETCONF YANG 1.1 virtual >>> interim >>> >>> meeting next week. If not, this topic should be discussed at the >>> IETF meeting. >>> >>> >>> >>> —Tom >>> >>> >>> Andy >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Oct 21, 2014:5:32 PM, at 5:32 PM, Sterne, Jason (Jason) < >>> jason.sterne@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> >>> Is there a preliminary agenda for the two NETMOD sessions at IETF91 ? >>> >>> >>> >>> Some thought about topics being split between the 1st (longer) >>> and 2nd >>> (shorter) sessions ? >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Jason >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> netmod mailing list >>> >>> netmod@ietf.org >>> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> netmod mailing list >>> >>> netmod@ietf.org >>> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> netmod mailing list >>> >>> netmod@ietf.org >>> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs >>> >>> PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> netmod mailing list >>> netmod@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> netmod mailing >>> listnetmod@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >>> >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> netmod mailing list >> netmod@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Thomas D. Nadeau
- [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Sterne, Jason (Jason)
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Eric Voit (evoit)
- [netmod] FW: IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Eric Voit (evoit)
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Sterne, Jason (Jason)
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Thomas D. Nadeau
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Sterne, Jason (Jason)
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Thomas D. Nadeau
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Thomas D. Nadeau
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Dana Blair (dblair)
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Lisa Huang (yihuan)
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Thomas D. Nadeau
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Thomas D. Nadeau
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Benoit Claise
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Benoit Claise
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Randy Presuhn
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Benoit Claise
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Benoit Claise
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Sterne, Jason (Jason)
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Balazs Lengyel
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Dean Bogdanovic
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Balazs Lengyel
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Dean Bogdanovic
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? t.petch
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? t.petch
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Andy Bierman