Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ?

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Tue, 04 November 2014 16:40 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C4941A9076 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 08:40:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.094
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dNwLGfEabcMz for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 08:40:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C91671A9046 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 08:40:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=19558; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1415119255; x=1416328855; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to; bh=/6UOf9E9XS7HNbHw+gJSGkGNdc/3zfk9dU2f5yzgZnc=; b=E1miLVKWVruyHVvTM96FUVHieUOGV/MnnWwJmk2sIgudyGvC3RMjFLhE 5jzRzy14OWNRlYdleyhlMRqjGe9f3x2gksd4gz8D5Y7WGKO7x3GNgEDHz Hy2fkSKQtL2JzPzOCXxXgrcBHz9MH6Ril/Vmrh5Mw/WM0eEQAzaXnBjmZ U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArQEADwAWVStJssW/2dsb2JhbABcg2JYzlcBC4Z3VAKBOAEBAQEBfYQDAQEEAQEBawoBEAsOCgkWAQcHCQMCAQIBDwYfEQYBDAEFAgEBBYgjAxINxwMNhikBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEXjlaBVxIBAU8GAYRLBYRpk32CTUOCEYExg0yCd4cpQoJnhAmDeTwvAYEOgTwBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,313,1413244800"; d="scan'208,217";a="230793540"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 04 Nov 2014 16:40:53 +0000
Received: from [10.60.67.84] (ams-bclaise-8913.cisco.com [10.60.67.84]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sA4Ger1K005639; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 16:40:53 GMT
Message-ID: <54590195.3010903@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 17:40:53 +0100
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>, "Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
References: <A125E53CE190A749957C19483DC79F9F5C977E5A@US70TWXCHMBA11.zam.alcatel-lucent.com> <D8D374DB-32C6-4725-AD1B-D4E1B23BC966@lucidvision.com> <CABCOCHSoDxZfzA0dnviB2yV8GbdqmUrGmJXsFxMy8_7MpG7W+w@mail.gmail.com> <79054E89-2D09-4461-8D35-8F6FA025B71F@nic.cz> <43060BE7-53EA-4B9D-B778-2FED58C0D60C@lucidvision.com> <52AE09CB-D4AB-4421-BBA4-1D9C45EA6957@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <52AE09CB-D4AB-4421-BBA4-1D9C45EA6957@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050000040604060709000907"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/YTHa-vVdDihjj1NS9_feC6zWWAY
Cc: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>, "rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org" <rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ?
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 16:40:59 -0000

Mahesh,

Not sure what exactly you want to present but let me draw your attention 
that the routing-related modules should be taken care of in their 
respective WG. See 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-yang-coord/current/msg00094.html

Regards, Benoit
> Tom,
>
> I am giving an update on the BFD YANG model in the BFD WG. I can give 
> a quick update (~1-2min) in NETMOD if such an update is desired.
>
> *Mahesh Jethanandani*
> mjethanandani@gmail.com <mailto:mjethanandani@gmail.com>
>
> On Oct 23, 2014, at 1:43 PM, "Thomas D. Nadeau" 
> <tnadeau@lucidvision.com <mailto:tnadeau@lucidvision.com>> wrote:
>
>>
>>    We have plenty of runway in the agenda right now so I will put it 
>> down as two items. We reserved two slots because I feel its important 
>> to encourage discussion during the face2face meetings so insofar as I 
>> can, I want to give you enough runway to discuss this in detail.
>>
>>    --Tom
>>
>>
>>> On Oct 23, 2014:12:13 PM, at 12:13 PM, Ladislav Lhotka 
>>> <lhotka@nic.cz <mailto:lhotka@nic.cz>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> apart from the two WG items draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-16 (to be 
>>> submitted) and draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-01, I'd like to discuss 
>>> the draft and draft-lhotka-netmod-yang-metadata-00. I think 5 
>>> minutes would be enough for the latter, I could even do it together 
>>> with yang-json.
>>>
>>> Thanks, Lada
>>>
>>> On 23 Oct 2014, at 18:02, Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com 
>>> <mailto:andy@yumaworks.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Thomas D. Nadeau 
>>>> <tnadeau@lucidvision.com <mailto:tnadeau@lucidvision.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>    Not yet. Please propose topics.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I would like 15 min. to discuss YANG conformance issues, specified 
>>>> in this draft:
>>>> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-bierman-netmod-yang-conformance-04.txt
>>>>
>>>> These issues may get resolved in the NETCONF YANG 1.1 virtual interim
>>>> meeting next week. If not, this topic should be discussed at the 
>>>> IETF meeting.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>    ---Tom
>>>>
>>>> Andy
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Oct 21, 2014:5:32 PM, at 5:32 PM, Sterne, Jason (Jason) 
>>>>> <jason.sterne@alcatel-lucent.com 
>>>>> <mailto:jason.sterne@alcatel-lucent.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there a preliminary agenda for the two NETMOD sessions at IETF91 ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Some thought about topics being split between the 1st (longer) and 
>>>>> 2nd (shorter) sessions ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Jason
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> netmod mailing list
>>>>> netmod@ietf.org <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> netmod mailing list
>>>> netmod@ietf.org <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> netmod mailing list
>>>> netmod@ietf.org <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs
>>> PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> netmod mailing list
>> netmod@ietf.org <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod