Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ?

Hi Jürgen,

I like this idea.

Regards, Benoit
> Hi,
>
> perhaps Tom can help compiling an overview which data model is
> discussed in (or proposed to) which working group and then we do not
> need individuals to step up and show a slide or two. With ~60 data
> models submitted to this IETF, this stepping up to the mike to say 2-3
> sentences alone would at least take an hour of meeting time.
>
> I am thinking about something as simple like the list below (organized
> by WG with markers to indicate [WG] working group documents and [IS]
> individual submissions).
>
> * NETCONF
>
>    - NETCONF Server Configuration Model [WG]
>      https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-server-model-04
>
>    - ...
>
> * NETMOD
>
>    - A YANG Data Model for Routing Management [WG]
>      https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-16
>
>    - Network Access Control List (ACL) YANG Data Model [WG]
>      https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bogdanovic-netmod-acl-model-02
>
>    - SYSLOG YANG model [WG]
>      https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wildes-netmod-syslog-model-05
>
>    - Defining and Using Metadata with YANG [IS]
>      https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lhotka-netmod-yang-metadata-00
>
>    - ...
>
> * ...
>
> Having such an overview recorded on the slides and hence in the
> proceedings will be useful. If we manage to compile such a list even
> before the meeting starts on the mailing list (that is by Sunday),
> then this list can also serve as a guide where to go to discuss the
> various YANG data modeling contributions.
>
> /js
>
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 10:16:27PM +0000, Mahesh Jethanandani wrote:
>> Benoit,
>>
>> I was going to give a quick update on the BFD YANG model, which is being
>> presented/discussed in its own WG.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue Nov 04 2014 at 8:40:55 AM Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> wrote:
>>
>>>   Mahesh,
>>>
>>> Not sure what exactly you want to present but let me draw your attention
>>> that the routing-related modules should be taken care of in their
>>> respective WG. See
>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-yang-coord/current/msg00094.html
>>>
>>> Regards, Benoit
>>>
>>> Tom,
>>>
>>>   I am giving an update on the BFD YANG model in the BFD WG. I can give a
>>> quick update (~1-2min) in NETMOD if such an update is desired.
>>>
>>> *Mahesh Jethanandani*
>>> mjethanandani@gmail.com
>>>
>>> On Oct 23, 2014, at 1:43 PM, "Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>      We have plenty of runway in the agenda right now so I will put it down
>>> as two items. We reserved two slots because I feel its important to
>>> encourage discussion during the face2face meetings so insofar as I can, I
>>> want to give you enough runway to discuss this in detail.
>>>
>>>      --Tom
>>>
>>>
>>> On Oct 23, 2014:12:13 PM, at 12:13 PM, Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>   Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>>   apart from the two WG items draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-16 (to be
>>> submitted) and draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-01, I’d like to discuss the
>>> draft and draft-lhotka-netmod-yang-metadata-00. I think 5 minutes would be
>>> enough for the latter, I could even do it together with yang-json.
>>>
>>>
>>>   Thanks, Lada
>>>
>>>
>>>   On 23 Oct 2014, at 18:02, Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Thomas D. Nadeau <
>>> tnadeau@lucidvision.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>       Not yet. Please propose topics.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    I would like 15 min. to discuss YANG conformance issues, specified in
>>> this draft:
>>>
>>>   http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-bierman-netmod-yang-conformance-04.txt
>>>
>>>
>>>    These issues may get resolved in the NETCONF YANG 1.1 virtual interim
>>>
>>>   meeting next week. If not, this topic should be discussed at the IETF
>>> meeting.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>       —Tom
>>>
>>>
>>>    Andy
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    On Oct 21, 2014:5:32 PM, at 5:32 PM, Sterne, Jason (Jason) <
>>> jason.sterne@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>     Hi all,
>>>
>>>
>>>     Is there a preliminary agenda for the two NETMOD sessions at IETF91 ?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     Some thought about topics being split between the 1st (longer) and 2nd
>>> (shorter) sessions ?
>>>
>>>
>>>     Thanks,
>>>
>>>    Jason
>>>
>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>
>>>    netmod mailing list
>>>
>>>    netmod@ietf.org
>>>
>>>    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    _______________________________________________
>>>
>>>   netmod mailing list
>>>
>>>   netmod@ietf.org
>>>
>>>   https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    _______________________________________________
>>>
>>>   netmod mailing list
>>>
>>>   netmod@ietf.org
>>>
>>>   https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>>>
>>>
>>>   --
>>>
>>> Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs
>>>
>>> PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> netmod mailing list
>>> netmod@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> netmod mailing listnetmod@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> netmod mailing list
>> netmod@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>