Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ?

Balazs Lengyel <balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com> Wed, 05 November 2014 15:32 UTC

Return-Path: <balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E67E81A8953 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 07:32:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yTc_N3lcymYR for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 07:32:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sesbmg23.ericsson.net (sesbmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.37]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C2EA1A8932 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 07:32:50 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-f791c6d00000617b-2b-545a4320134f
Received: from ESESSHC018.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sesbmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 06.65.24955.0234A545; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 16:32:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [159.107.197.98] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.74) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.174.1; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 16:32:48 +0100
Message-ID: <545A431F.8010401@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 16:32:47 +0100
From: Balazs Lengyel <balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
References: <A125E53CE190A749957C19483DC79F9F5C977E5A@US70TWXCHMBA11.zam.alcatel-lucent.com> <D8D374DB-32C6-4725-AD1B-D4E1B23BC966@lucidvision.com> <CABCOCHSoDxZfzA0dnviB2yV8GbdqmUrGmJXsFxMy8_7MpG7W+w@mail.gmail.com> <79054E89-2D09-4461-8D35-8F6FA025B71F@nic.cz> <43060BE7-53EA-4B9D-B778-2FED58C0D60C@lucidvision.com> <52AE09CB-D4AB-4421-BBA4-1D9C45EA6957@gmail.com> <54590195.3010903@cisco.com> <CAAchPMtcvd3xb9xCGEBHqTZg8G-Fg76z8T2Wi1QLHoS=W_fiag@mail.gmail.com> <54595361.5000907@cisco.com> <CABCOCHSqWWPDyTWXMj3+DUJ89GGCiHD6mhK3W7bJf-+VgS_cRA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABCOCHSqWWPDyTWXMj3+DUJ89GGCiHD6mhK3W7bJf-+VgS_cRA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrJLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvja6Cc1SIwa095hYPjsxitzj6WMJi /sVGVovnc2ayOLB4TPm9kdVjyZKfTB5fLn9m82jpv8gSwBLFZZOSmpNZllqkb5fAlXGwdwZb QVNgRdvlV+wNjI9suhg5OCQETCTOtSZ3MXICmWISF+6tZ+ti5OIQEjjCKHF2zyF2CGc1o8TX aydYQKp4BbQlemesYwWxWQRUJA5M6wWz2QSMJKb2nwerERWIkrhzqZ8Vol5Q4uTMJ2BxEQEP iRndJ8HizAIxEl+/b2YCsYUFdCSOfXwDtXkTi8S0aa/YQBKcAoESzfNmMUI0WEgsfnOQHcKW l2jeOpsZxBYS0JB4eOEv6wRGwVlI9s1C0jILScsCRuZVjKLFqcVJuelGxnqpRZnJxcX5eXp5 qSWbGIFhfXDLb9UdjJffOB5iFOBgVOLh3TgpMkSINbGsuDL3EKM0B4uSOO/Cc/OChQTSE0tS s1NTC1KL4otKc1KLDzEycXBKNTD2mHtb+q7yC7rvo7t7vbl6SpJJ4vL533gf+laes/66IGrP vO1nbPczz5ljPX3pjDdrxbLWZe9sEuOozvz/6Uf0lT6T6XvTd30/MKn71UEr080u/3iajhZ+ O7Ns6sY9F6/4iLjOiT1dIDvrQ/js4vxQgaTFt2Otp/zq+J18rkBr1n6jI6u3a5QwKbEUZyQa ajEXFScCAJD99+NMAgAA
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/2gcpldGgVbTN0C0KDR4-1f-XHyw
Cc: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>, "rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org" <rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ?
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 15:32:55 -0000

Hello,
A very short overview would be good. All drafts by workgroup in 15 minutes.
regards Balazs

On 2014-11-05 00:20, Andy Bierman wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> wrote:
>> Mahesh,
>>
>> Benoit,
>>
>> I was going to give a quick update on the BFD YANG model, which is being
>> presented/discussed in its own WG.
>>
>> I wonder which ideal outcome you want a presentation in the NETMOD WG?
>>
>> Here's the list of drafts that have normative or unclassified references to
>> YANG:
>>
>> draft-vanderstok-core-comi-05                     2014-10-27  Active
>> draft-shi-alto-yang-json-00                       2014-10-27  Active
>> draft-shi-alto-yang-model-00                      2014-10-27  Active
>> draft-netmod-clemm-datastore-push-00              2014-10-27  Active
>> draft-wildes-netmod-syslog-model-05               2014-10-27  Active
>> draft-zhang-nvo3-yang-active-active-cfg-00        2014-10-27  Active
>> draft-zaalouk-supa-configuration-model-01         2014-10-27  Active
>> draft-wang-lime-rpc-yang-oam-management-00        2014-10-27  Active
>> draft-vergara-flexigrid-yang-00                   2014-10-27  Active
>> draft-gandhi-mpls-te-yang-model-01                2014-10-27  Active
>> draft-txh-opsawg-lime-gap-analysis-01             2014-10-27  Active
>> draft-zheng-netmod-xmi-yang-translation-00        2014-10-27  Active
>> draft-chen-i2rs-mpls-ldp-info-model-00            2014-10-27  Active
>> draft-tripathy-cloud-sla-yang-model-00            2014-10-27  Active
>> draft-clemm-i2rs-yang-l3-topo-00                  2014-10-27  Active
>> draft-contreras-supa-yang-network-topo-01         2014-10-27  Active
>> draft-wang-yang-bfd-oam-00                        2014-10-27  Active
>> draft-ietf-netconf-server-model-04                2014-10-26  Active
>> draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-01                  2014-10-26  Active
>> draft-shen-l2tpext-l2tpv3-yang-model-00           2014-10-26  Active
>> draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-16                  2014-10-26  Active
>> draft-shaikh-idr-bgp-model-00                     2014-10-26  Active
>> draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-03                    2014-10-25  Active
>> draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-01                        2014-10-25  Active
>> draft-sarikaya-dmm-for-wifi-01                    2014-10-24  Active
>> draft-voit-netmod-peer-mount-requirements-01      2014-10-24  Active
>> draft-shi-model-json-msg-yang-00                  2014-10-24  Active
>> draft-liu-pim-igmp-mld-yang-00                    2014-10-23  Active
>> draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-01                   2014-10-23  Active
>> draft-liu-pim-yang-00                             2014-10-23  Active
>> draft-asechoud-netmod-diffserv-model-00           2014-10-22  Active
>> draft-dong-i2rs-l2-network-topology-00            2014-10-21  Active
>> draft-bierman-netconf-efficiency-extensions-02    2014-10-21  Active
>> draft-zhang-nvo3-yang-cfg-00                      2014-10-21  Active
>> draft-sun-softwire-yang-00                        2014-10-20  Active
>> draft-yeung-netmod-ospf-02                        2014-10-14  Active
>> draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-01                    2014-10-13  Active
>> draft-clemm-i2rs-yang-network-topo-01             2014-10-10  Active
>> draft-ietf-netconf-call-home-01                   2014-10-10  Active
>> draft-bogdanovic-netmod-acl-model-02              2014-10-08  Active
>> draft-clemm-netmod-mount-02                       2014-10-07  Active
>> draft-zhdankin-netmod-bgp-cfg-01                  2014-10-02  Active
>> draft-wang-i2rs-ospf-dm-00                        2014-09-26  Active
>> draft-bhuvan-bmwg-of-controller-benchmarking-01   2014-09-25  Active
>> draft-zhang-mpls-tp-yang-oam-00                   2014-09-25  Active
>> draft-bierman-netmod-yang-conformance-04          2014-09-24  Active
>> draft-ietf-netmod-snmp-cfg-08                     2014-09-18  In IESG
>> processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>
>> draft-frank-netconf-conformance-00                2014-09-16  Active
>> draft-haas-i2rs-netmod-netconf-requirements-00    2014-09-12  Active
>> draft-lhotka-netmod-yang-metadata-00              2014-09-11  Active
>> draft-schoenw-lmap-yang-01                        2014-09-02  Active
>> draft-zhuang-l2vpn-yang-cfg-00                    2014-08-24  Active
>> draft-zhuang-l2vpn-evpn-yang-cfg-00               2014-08-16  Active
>> draft-chen-mpls-ldp-yang-cfg-00                   2014-08-15  Active
>> draft-chen-mpls-te-yang-cfg-00                    2014-08-15  Active
>> draft-zhuang-l3vpn-yang-cfg-00                    2014-08-15  Active
>> draft-scharf-alto-yang-00                         2014-07-04  Active
>> draft-yang-netmod-location-00                     2014-07-04  Active
>> draft-fang-l3vpn-virtual-pe-05                    2014-07-04  Active
>> draft-mekking-dnsop-kasp-00                       2014-07-04  Active
>> draft-xjz-opsawg-nfvmodel-00                      2014-07-04  Active
>> draft-liu-netmod-yang-abstract-topo-00            2014-07-03  Active
>> draft-ietf-netconf-yang-patch-01                  2014-07-03  Active
>> draft-zheng-netmod-integrate-operations-00        2014-07-02  Active
>> draft-liu-netconf-multi-instances-00              2014-07-02  Active
>> draft-litkowski-isis-yang-isis-cfg-01             2014-06-27  Active
>> draft-litkowski-netmod-isis-cfg-00                2014-06-17  Active
>> draft-lonvick-private-tax-08                      2014-06-09  Active
>> draft-tp-i2rs-yang-00                             2014-05-08  Active
>>
>> That could be a lot of updates...
>> I believe we should focus on the YANG models that don't have an existing WG.
>>
> I would prefer to spend all the meeting time
> trying to discuss open issues in chartered items.  I don't see why
> the NETMOD WG needs to spend time on status reports for
> any unchartered work.
>
> I don't agree that NETMOD WG should be the home of SYSLOG
> or any other protocol specific data models. IMO all those type of drafts
> should try to find a home in a protocol WG with the right experts.
>
>
>
> Andy
>
>
>
>> Reminder: A good avenue for any YANG models is
>> http://www.ietf.org/meeting/91/tutorials/yang-session.html
>>
>> Regards, Benoit
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue Nov 04 2014 at 8:40:55 AM Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> wrote:
>>> Mahesh,
>>>
>>> Not sure what exactly you want to present but let me draw your attention
>>> that the routing-related modules should be taken care of in their respective
>>> WG. See
>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-yang-coord/current/msg00094.html
>>>
>>> Regards, Benoit
>>>
>>> Tom,
>>>
>>> I am giving an update on the BFD YANG model in the BFD WG. I can give a
>>> quick update (~1-2min) in NETMOD if such an update is desired.
>>>
>>> Mahesh Jethanandani
>>> mjethanandani@gmail.com
>>>
>>> On Oct 23, 2014, at 1:43 PM, "Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>     We have plenty of runway in the agenda right now so I will put it down
>>> as two items. We reserved two slots because I feel its important to
>>> encourage discussion during the face2face meetings so insofar as I can, I
>>> want to give you enough runway to discuss this in detail.
>>>
>>>     --Tom
>>>
>>>
>>> On Oct 23, 2014:12:13 PM, at 12:13 PM, Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> apart from the two WG items draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-16 (to be
>>> submitted) and draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-01, I’d like to discuss the draft
>>> and draft-lhotka-netmod-yang-metadata-00. I think 5 minutes would be enough
>>> for the latter, I could even do it together with yang-json.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks, Lada
>>>
>>>
>>> On 23 Oct 2014, at 18:02, Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Thomas D. Nadeau
>>> <tnadeau@lucidvision.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>     Not yet. Please propose topics.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I would like 15 min. to discuss YANG conformance issues, specified in this
>>> draft:
>>>
>>> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-bierman-netmod-yang-conformance-04.txt
>>>
>>>
>>> These issues may get resolved in the NETCONF YANG 1.1 virtual interim
>>>
>>> meeting next week. If not, this topic should be discussed at the IETF
>>> meeting.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     —Tom
>>>
>>>
>>> Andy
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Oct 21, 2014:5:32 PM, at 5:32 PM, Sterne, Jason (Jason)
>>> <jason.sterne@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>>
>>> Is there a preliminary agenda for the two NETMOD sessions at IETF91 ?
>>>
>>>
>>> Some thought about topics being split between the 1st (longer) and 2nd
>>> (shorter) sessions ?
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Jason
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>
>>> netmod mailing list
>>>
>>> netmod@ietf.org
>>>
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>
>>> netmod mailing list
>>>
>>> netmod@ietf.org
>>>
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>
>>> netmod mailing list
>>>
>>> netmod@ietf.org
>>>
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs
>>>
>>> PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> netmod mailing list
>>> netmod@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> netmod mailing list
>>> netmod@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> netmod mailing list
>> netmod@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

-- 
Balazs Lengyel                       Ericsson Hungary Ltd.
Senior Specialist
ECN: 831 7320                        Tel: +36-1-437-7320
Mobile: +36-70-330-7909              email: Balazs.Lengyel@ericsson.com