IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ntp] NTPv5 draft

Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net> Tue, 01 December 2020 18:36 UTC

Return-Path: <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C51F23A1432 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 10:36:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.037
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.037 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR=1.951, PDS_RDNS_DYNAMIC_FP=0.001, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LbsPu39GMEnG for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 10:36:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net (ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net [64.139.1.69]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 119773A1416 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 10:36:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shuksan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 113F940605C; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 10:36:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.3
To: Doug Arnold <doug.arnold@meinberg-usa.com>
cc: "ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>, hmurray@megapathdsl.net
From: Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>
In-Reply-To: Message from Doug Arnold <doug.arnold@meinberg-usa.com> of "Tue, 01 Dec 2020 13:04:29 GMT." <7FD4E2DD-04A0-4B62-BBD4-EE5F00236831@meinberg-usa.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2020 10:36:46 -0800
Message-Id: <20201201183646.113F940605C@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/vjDAD3IRhx89UEtf7vewCg-BvTI>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] NTPv5 draft
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2020 18:36:52 -0000

doug.arnold@meinberg-usa.com said:
> Here is another use case where secure NTP might not be needed.  All the
> traffic in the application, including ntp is protected by IPsec or MACsec.
> Yes that add some delays, but for some applications that is okay. 

How does IPsec work?  Does setting up the working keys depend on time like the 
certificate checking for TLS does?

-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email