Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Don't arm the handshake timer if there's no data (#2590)

martinduke <notifications@github.com> Fri, 05 April 2019 14:24 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3105712015A for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 07:24:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mT0OWUtnAWtZ for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 07:24:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o7.sgmail.github.com (o7.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C9DA1201CB for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 07:24:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=hQav5B9x182Siy0NDrKTo7nG7WY=; b=GDOjUfxDXg4N70+o lT9zQ0s+FpyAcxzsTNE3tOl9EjXHu16gnQtsNovLLQFp/++Nx4ENPhc1P2TrtqTQ dxGTVLIBacMO9nyamjbHgBd6gOCZy4OKfbvtRdcia+zTWeJ05BSPjs1gJnnONveS XrWnoOmrIm3z95KxU92ruqB9isY=
Received: by filter1665p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter1665p1mdw1-8138-5CA76535-35 2019-04-05 14:24:53.890467639 +0000 UTC m=+692129.733728944
Received: from github-lowworker-1c220e1.cp1-iad.github.net (unknown [192.30.252.44]) by ismtpd0005p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id GsMi7hNMSxKUzp8RrkJlRQ for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 05 Apr 2019 14:24:53.841 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from github.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by github-lowworker-1c220e1.cp1-iad.github.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD6691612C7 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 07:24:53 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2019 14:24:53 +0000
From: martinduke <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abbc7a17677a8e08ee787d14a29d5b3c72e65e2e1792cf0000000118bf273592a169ce199da23e@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2590/review/223296742@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2590@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2590@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Don't arm the handshake timer if there's no data (#2590)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ca76535cc04d_57ce3fa2bc0d45b435865c"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinduke
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak3McXfnz59bTPOsouRqEn1YsjbE9VhtsvbUxf EXqQor796ArWqxUeN2eUXBS/nQGgdNmr/yzoEVeMldCfbUS0URA/9J9KSaK3G7aqGmexyX8turIQ24 LJhpXlmKhh4jvP/OwUH769Z6we3k4j0QZGJCCepId8N2ZJRfhtj/SZWLQY9LCXA5sB9QEf41u9F4X8 I=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/WzBrwfba0Plp_fdB_47rW6gmrYc>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2019 14:24:57 -0000

martinduke commented on this pull request.

My comments are a little broader than the issue, but it's all related.

> @@ -1151,7 +1152,8 @@ OnLossDetectionTimeout():
     DetectLostPackets(pn_space)
   // Retransmit crypto data if no packets were lost
   // and there are still crypto packets in flight.
-  else if (crypto packets are in flight):
+  else if (crypto packets are in flight &&
+           crypto data to send):
     // Crypto retransmission timeout.
     RetransmitUnackedCryptoData()
     crypto_count++

else if (client && (no 1-RTT keys)
    send a 1200B packet
or something to that effect

> @@ -1114,7 +1114,8 @@ SetLossDetectionTimer():
     loss_detection_timer.update(loss_time)
     return
 
-  if (crypto packets are in flight):
+  if (crypto packets are in flight &&
+      crypto data to send):

|| (client && (no 1-RTT keys yet))

> @@ -458,11 +458,11 @@ sent, then no alarm should be armed until data has been received from the
 client.
 
 Because the server could be blocked until more packets are received, the client
-MUST start the crypto retransmission timer even if there is no unacknowledged
-CRYPTO data.  If the timer expires and the client has no CRYPTO data to
-retransmit and does not have Handshake keys, it SHOULD send an Initial packet in
-a UDP datagram of at least 1200 bytes.  If the client has Handshake keys, it
-SHOULD send a Handshake packet.
+MUST start the crypto retransmission timer until it has 1RTT keys, even if there

MUST start the crypto retransmission timer upon timeout....

In line 448: ack-eliciting crypto packet?

LIne 451: "if possible, and restart the crypto retransmission timer if there is unacknowledged data"

> @@ -458,11 +458,11 @@ sent, then no alarm should be armed until data has been received from the
 client.
 
 Because the server could be blocked until more packets are received, the client
-MUST start the crypto retransmission timer even if there is no unacknowledged
-CRYPTO data.  If the timer expires and the client has no CRYPTO data to
-retransmit and does not have Handshake keys, it SHOULD send an Initial packet in
-a UDP datagram of at least 1200 bytes.  If the client has Handshake keys, it
-SHOULD send a Handshake packet.
+MUST start the crypto retransmission timer until it has 1RTT keys, even if there
+is no unacknowledged CRYPTO data.  If the timer expires and the client has no
+CRYPTO data to retransmit and does not have Handshake keys, it SHOULD send an

SHOULD -> MUST? If we don't do this, the connection could hang in a fairly common case.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2590#pullrequestreview-223296742