Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization
Jon Peterson <jon.peterson@neustar.biz> Thu, 05 February 2009 00:12 UTC
Return-Path: <jon.peterson@neustar.biz>
X-Original-To: rai@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rai@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9065928C14F for <rai@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:12:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.153
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.153 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.446, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tAY2JiguOfG3 for <rai@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:12:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from neustar.com (ns6.neustar.com [156.154.16.88]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1167B3A69C7 for <rai@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:12:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; d=neustar.biz; s=neustarbiz; c=simple/simple; q=dns; t=1233792722; x=1233879122; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=QjVvuOQ43fh5CdGgxSngmmFhyFJbumPWZxDYUo15xp8qBmkq8i0ejGOUna+7FvyW19u1NxL5OKjlZR xbYFj2Lw==
Received: from ([10.31.13.108]) by stihiron1.va.neustar.com with ESMTP id 5202702.14944267; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 19:11:46 -0500
Message-ID: <498A2EC2.6080807@neustar.biz>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:11:46 -0800
From: Jon Peterson <jon.peterson@neustar.biz>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Macintosh/20081209)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>
References: <498A0FE8.5040307@neustar.biz> <XFE-SJC-212VuMhvqgS0000bb12@xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <XFE-SJC-212VuMhvqgS0000bb12@xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: rai@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization
X-BeenThere: rai@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Real-time Applications and Infrastructure \(RAI\)" <rai.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rai>, <mailto:rai-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rai>
List-Post: <mailto:rai@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rai-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rai>, <mailto:rai-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 00:12:25 -0000
Existing working group items will find a home somewhere as a part of the transition process. I don't think we yet have an exhaustive mapping of what will live where, but, we recognize that it may be necessary to grandfather chartered work into SIPCORE or DISPATCH in order to minimize disruption to ongoing efforts (we just wouldn't let those groups pick up new milestones/deliverables that fall outside their defined scope). That much said, we hope that the process we are transitioning to will enable work like the location conveyance header to live more in the "edges" of the RAI area than in the core - in other words, for a WG like GEOPRIV to be capable of chartering a new header like this themselves and executing it in the scope of their group. Historically, this document exposed some of the more prominent flaws in our current separation of requirements and mechanisms into different administrative areas. It would be nice if those inefficiencies could become a thing of the past. Jon Peterson NeuStar, Inc. James M. Polk wrote: > > I am generally happy with the suggestions here. > > That said, what I do not see is what will happen to existing SIP WG > IDs that are going down a Standards track -- that do not directly > relate to RFCs 3261-5. This appears to be a fairly major gap in > what's to occur to them - within the explanation below. > > Let's take an example of one ID I'm writing on Location Conveyance, > creating a new Geolocation header. This is clearly not SIPCORE as > defined, yet in some circles - especially around the the ECRIT and > GEOPRIV WGs, this new header is quite necessary. > > What's the happen with an ID such as Conveyance? > > Or is this even more motivation to complete the work before March 09? > > (once RFC 5378 issues are resolved (!!), of course) > > ;-) > > James > > At 04:00 PM 2/4/2009, Jon Peterson wrote: > > >Since the open area meeting in Minneapolis, Cullen and I have given > >some thought to the best way to try to act on the discussion and > >suggested changes. As a continuing part of that process, though > >certainly not the last step, we'd like some input from the community > >on the following proposal and accompanying draft. > > > >We have long heard concerns about the perennially overworked SIP and > >SIPPING WGs, to say nothing of the general structure of long-lived > >working groups that serve as a standing army to attack problems as > >they arise. The main drawback of this structure is that these groups > >assume responsibility for rosters of known "hard" problems which > >seemingly never complete, while easier and more tactical work > >struggles for attention and participate energy gradually depletes. > >One wouldn't have to look hard in either of those groups for > >evidence of this phenomenon. > > > >Our proposal is therefore to end the current SIP and SIPPING working > >groups and replace them with a different structure. This will > >include one continuing long-lived working group called SIPCORE, but > >unlike SIP, SIPCORE will have a more narrow mandate of handling only > >updates or revisions to the core SIP specifications (which we define > >here, somewhat arbitrarily, as RFC3261 through RFC3265). This means > >that work previously tied to SIP, such as ongoing security work, > >would find a new home in this structure. In this proposal the > >SIPPING working group will be replaced by a more radical departure, > >a working group called DISPATCH. DISPATCH will function much more > >like the "open area" groups one sees in other areas - a forum where > >new issues and ideas can be presented. DISPATCH will be tasked with > >identifying the right venue for new work in the RAI area; the > >deliverables of the group might be a BoF charter or an initial > >problem statement document, but no protocol work as such. We hope to > >use the DISPATCH WG as an incubator for narrowly-scoped, short > >duration BoF or working group efforts to solve particular problems. > >Ideally, we could emulate structures like the RTPSEC BoF or the > >recent P2Pi workshop, both of which were far lighter-weight than a > >traditional WG, to address specific issues a more timely manner than > >we might have with our previous structure. > > > >Since this proposal would require a revision to RFC3427, we have > >begun work on one, which can now be found here: > > > >http://svn.resiprocate.org/rep/ietf-drafts/fluffy/draft-peterson-rai-rfc3427bis-01a.txt > > > >(Sorry, we can't submit this yet due to new RFC 5378 rules but will > >submit as soon as that gets fixed) > > > >In addition to describing the new role of the SIPCORE and DISPATCH > >WG, this document also makes a significant change to the header > >registration policies, as was recommended in Jonathan's > >modest-proposal document. The "P-" header process is deprecated in > >RFC3427bis in favor of a more open IANA policy requiring only expert > >review for Informational headers - in a nutshell, this means that > >new proposals for headers that would have used the "P-" prefix are > >directed to omit it, and that these headers can be registered with > >the IANA without an Internet-Draft if desired. Note that this does > >not mean that we will rename PAID to AID - existing headers will > >continue as they are, only the process for new registrations would > >change. It is hoped that this change will enable more work to be > >done at the "edges" of the RAI area without depending on winning the > >approval of everyone at the core. > > > >Before we undertake any change this radical, however, we'd like some > >input from the community about the overall direction. Comments on > >the document are also welcome, though do not consider this a last > >call review, but more of an overall conceptual read. We do aim to > >implement some changes before the end of March, however, to > >facilitate the transition to the new Area Director. > > > >Cullen & Jon > >_______________________________________________ > >RAI mailing list > >RAI@ietf.org > >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rai >
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization James M. Polk
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Jon Peterson
- [RAI] RAI reorganization Jon Peterson
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization James M. Polk
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Dan York
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Henry Sinnreich
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Tom Taylor
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Henry Sinnreich
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization James M. Polk
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization James M. Polk
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Mary Barnes
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Mary Barnes
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Alan Johnston
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Adam Roach
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Francois Audet
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Eric Burger
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Dan Wing
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Markus.Isomaki
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Adam Roach
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Ted Hardie
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Dan York
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization - allocation of exis… Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Jiri Kuthan
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Adam Roach
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Adam Roach
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Richard Shockey
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Adam Roach
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Adam Roach
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Jon Peterson
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Adam Roach
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization - Clusters Cullen Jennings
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization - allocation of exis… Cullen Jennings
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Cullen Jennings
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Francois Audet
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Henry Sinnreich
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization - Clusters Roni Even
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Roni Even
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization - Clusters Cullen Jennings
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Salvatore Loreto
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Henning Schulzrinne
- [RAI] Option-tag registration Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Eric Burger
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Mary Barnes
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization - Clusters Mary Barnes
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization - Clusters Vijay K. Gurbani
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Mary Barnes
- [RAI] Software as open source (was RAI reorganiza… Henry Sinnreich
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization - Clusters Eric Burger
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Vijay K. Gurbani
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization - Clusters Jon Peterson
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization - Clusters Mary Barnes
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization - Clusters Tom Taylor
- [RAI] Code -- was RE: RAI reorganization Hannes Tschofenig
- [RAI] SIP to Draft -- was RAI reorganization Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [RAI] SIP to Draft -- was RAI reorganization Mary Barnes
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Francois Audet
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Vijay K. Gurbani
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Ben Campbell
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization - Clusters Ben Campbell
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization - Clusters Ben Campbell
- [RAI] SIP and Open Source (was Re: RAI reorganiza… Adam Roach
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [RAI] SIP and Open Source (was Re: RAI reorga… Adam Roach
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Francois Audet
- Re: [RAI] SIP and Open Source (was Re: RAI reorga… Vijay K. Gurbani
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Mike Hammer (hmmr)
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Vijay K. Gurbani
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization - Clusters Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization - Clusters Elwell, John
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [RAI] Code -- was RE: RAI reorganization Eric Burger
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Francois Audet
- [RAI] The Cluster Idea ... was RAI reorganization… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [RAI] Code -- was RE: RAI reorganization Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization - role of SIP Markus.Isomaki
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization - allocation of exis… Elwell, John
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization Jiri Kuthan
- Re: [RAI] SIP to Draft -- was RAI reorganization James M. Polk
- Re: [RAI] The Cluster Idea ... was RAI reorganiza… Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [RAI] SIP to Draft -- was RAI reorganization Mary Barnes
- Re: [RAI] The Cluster Idea ... was RAI reorganiza… Cullen Jennings
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization - allocation of exis… Cullen Jennings
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization - Clusters Cullen Jennings
- Re: [RAI] The Cluster Idea ... was RAI reorganiza… Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [RAI] RAI reorganization - Clusters James M. Polk
- Re: [RAI] The Cluster Idea ... was RAI reorganiza… Elwell, John
- Re: [RAI] The Cluster Idea ... was RAI reorganiza… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [RAI] The Cluster Idea ... was RAI reorganiza… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [RAI] The Cluster Idea ... was RAI reorganiza… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [RAI] The Cluster Idea ... was RAI reorganiza… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [RAI] The Cluster Idea ... was RAI reorganiza… Markus.Isomaki
- Re: [RAI] The Cluster Idea ... was RAI reorganiza… Elwell, John
- Re: [RAI] The Cluster Idea ... was RAI reorganiza… Elwell, John
- Re: [RAI] The Cluster Idea ... was RAI reorganiza… Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [RAI] The Cluster Idea ... was RAI reorganiza… Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [RAI] The Cluster Idea ... was RAI reorganiza… Schmidt, Christian 1. (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [RAI] The Cluster Idea ... was RAI reorganiza… Michael Procter
- Re: [RAI] The Cluster Idea ... was RAI reorganiza… Dan York
- Re: [RAI] The Cluster Idea ... was RAI reorganiza… Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [RAI] The Cluster Idea ... was RAI reorganiza… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [RAI] The Cluster Idea ... was RAI reorganiza… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [RAI] The Cluster Idea ... was RAI reorganiza… Roni Even
- Re: [RAI] The Cluster Idea ... was RAI reorganiza… Henry Sinnreich
- Re: [RAI] The Cluster Idea ... was RAI reorganiza… Henry Sinnreich
- Re: [RAI] The Cluster Idea ... was RAI reorganiza… Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [RAI] The Cluster Idea ... was RAI reorganiza… Markus.Isomaki
- Re: [RAI] The Cluster Idea ... was RAI reorganiza… Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [RAI] The Cluster Idea ... was RAI reorganiza… Michael Procter
- Re: [RAI] The Cluster Idea ... was RAI reorganiza… Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [RAI] The Cluster Idea ... was RAI reorganiza… Elwell, John
- Re: [RAI] The Cluster Idea ... was RAI reorganiza… Elwell, John
- Re: [RAI] The Cluster Idea ... was RAI reorganiza… Henry Sinnreich
- Re: [RAI] The Cluster Idea ... was RAI reorganiza… Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [RAI] The Cluster Idea ... was RAI reorganiza… Cullen Jennings
- Re: [RAI] The Cluster Idea ... was RAI reorganiza… Cullen Jennings
- Re: [RAI] The Cluster Idea ... was RAI reorganiza… Henry Sinnreich
- Re: [RAI] The Cluster Idea ... was RAI reorganiza… Schmidt, Christian 1. (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [RAI] The Cluster Idea ... was RAI reorganiza… Dan York
- Re: [RAI] The Cluster Idea ... was RAI reorganiza… Henry Sinnreich
- Re: [RAI] The Cluster Idea ... was RAI reorganiza… Lars Eggert
- Re: [RAI] The Cluster Idea ... was RAI reorganiza… Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [RAI] The Cluster Idea ... was RAI reorganiza… Mike Hammer (hmmr)
- [RAI] Combining the use of SIP and XMPP in an end… Markus.Isomaki
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Scott Lawrence
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Dan York
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Richard Shockey
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Dean Willis
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Richard Shockey
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Dean Willis
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Cullen Jennings
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Christer Holmberg
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Christer Holmberg
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Christer Holmberg
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Scott Lawrence
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Hans Erik van Elburg
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Peterson, Jon
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Scott Lawrence
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Dean Willis
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Christer Holmberg
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Dean Willis
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Kevin P. Fleming
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Adam Roach
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Elwell, John
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Christer Holmberg
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Christer Holmberg
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Dean Willis
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Christer Holmberg
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Dean Willis
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Dean Willis
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Adam Roach
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [RAI] Option-tag registration Adam Roach