IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rats] draft-richardson-rats-usecases-00 comments

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 13 March 2019 03:27 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 331B612788C for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 20:27:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LpBgyTN6pU_A for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 20:27:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CE8312705F for <rats@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 20:27:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2:56b2:3ff:fe0b:d84]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 433F93808A; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 23:27:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 045A3ACA; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 23:27:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01EF783B; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 23:27:42 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Anthony Nadalin <tonynad=40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
cc: "rats@ietf.org" <rats@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <MW2PR00MB03963ABEB87211AD28A16240A6490@MW2PR00MB0396.namprd00.prod.outlook.com>
References: <MW2PR00MB03963ABEB87211AD28A16240A6490@MW2PR00MB0396.namprd00.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 23:27:41 -0400
Message-ID: <12503.1552447661@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/F-u1bXYyvo44w3Gcm10s5W_oqRc>
Subject: Re: [Rats] draft-richardson-rats-usecases-00 comments
X-BeenThere: rats@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Remote Attestation Procedures <rats.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats/>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 03:27:45 -0000

Anthony Nadalin <tonynad=40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
    > The section on FIDO usecase (5.3) is out of date, as in FIDO/W3C there are
    > many attestation formats that are acceptable from devices, the major concern
    > that we have is the privacy issues as most all the attestation formats lead
    > to potential collusion in one form or the other. The JS API is now the W3C
    > WebAuthentication API that is a recommendation now, this is no longer in
    > FIDO. I would be happy to send edits to this section.

That would be wonderful, THANK YOU!
It's a -00 afterall, and the goal is to tease out what might be
old/nonsensical/etc. so that we can get to the bottom of things :-)

(I thought I did say that it all became the WebAuthentication API...)

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email