IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rats] More use cases for draft-richardson-rats-usecases-00

"Smith, Ned" <ned.smith@intel.com> Fri, 22 March 2019 21:01 UTC

Return-Path: <ned.smith@intel.com>
X-Original-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40258131581 for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 14:01:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WtE3jtCshA9J for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 14:01:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9D1713157D for <rats@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 14:01:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message)
X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False
Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Mar 2019 14:01:54 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,256,1549958400"; d="scan'208";a="216693052"
Received: from orsmsx103.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.225.130]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Mar 2019 14:01:53 -0700
Received: from orsmsx109.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.11.11]) by ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.129]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 14:01:53 -0700
From: "Smith, Ned" <ned.smith@intel.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, Laurence Lundblade <lgl@island-resort.com>, "Heldt-Sheller, Nathan" <nathan.heldt-sheller@intel.com>
CC: "rats@ietf.org" <rats@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Rats] More use cases for draft-richardson-rats-usecases-00
Thread-Index: AQHU30/xj2BiBGEziUKa7njbv8kyH6YXXCyAgAD8bgA=
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 21:01:53 +0000
Message-ID: <BA6E28A7-0F6A-46A8-AB1B-A64B9229F149@intel.com>
References: <MW2PR00MB03963ABEB87211AD28A16240A6490@MW2PR00MB0396.namprd00.prod.outlook.com> <12503.1552447661@localhost> <58E37DB5-098C-4387-9A52-4AECD0F69F25@island-resort.com> <6495.1553219901@dooku.sandelman.ca>
In-Reply-To: <6495.1553219901@dooku.sandelman.ca>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.17.0.190309
x-originating-ip: [10.254.102.70]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <15C325AD0E8A6E4C8E0D7AF14FE7BB18@intel.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/qsJ9JiYyNGSCxmk6YUzhcEgXYoQ>
Subject: Re: [Rats] More use cases for draft-richardson-rats-usecases-00
X-BeenThere: rats@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Remote Attestation Procedures <rats.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats/>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 21:01:56 -0000

I'm aware that the Open Connectivity Foundation (OCF) has implemented an IoT onboarding use case. Possibly it makes sense to reference one of their documents?
-Ned

On 3/22/19, 7:46 AM, "RATS on behalf of Michael Richardson" <rats-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:

    
    Laurence Lundblade <lgl@island-resort.com> wrote:
        > The TCG use case seems more like a description of technology than a use
        > case.
    
    yes, I was given a document in progress, and I felt it was very difficult
    to determine what the use case was exactly.
    I also felt it was  important to write something down to ferret out the target.
    
    But, in particular what I saw was that it was more about attesting to
    the integrity of physical systems in an enterprise rather than, for instance,
    attesting to absense of holes for video to escape into.
    I gather you did not get this from my text, so I will attempt to improve it.
    
        > There is the Cisco / Network Function use case that is oriented around
        > the list of SW components and measurement of them. Eric Voit is the man
        > for that I think. Henk and a few others were also into it.
    
        > I also think there is at least one IoT use case. Maybe it is one with
        > very many sub use cases. The main issue there is on boarding devices to
        > an IoT management platform that have been drop-shipped or sent straight
        > to the consumer or such.
    
    Are there documents you can refer me to?
    
    --
    Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
     -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email