Re: [Rats] More use cases for draft-richardson-rats-usecases-00

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sat, 30 March 2019 11:04 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5703120163 for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 Mar 2019 04:04:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B-tdB3RZp9WD for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 Mar 2019 04:04:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C664A120026 for <rats@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 Mar 2019 04:04:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (unknown [89.248.140.11]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85B411F45B; Sat, 30 Mar 2019 11:04:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 7C9B1343E; Sat, 30 Mar 2019 12:04:50 +0100 (CET)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Carl Wallace <carl@redhoundsoftware.com>
cc: "rats@ietf.org" <rats@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <D8C23800.D851F%carl@redhoundsoftware.com>
References: <MW2PR00MB03963ABEB87211AD28A16240A6490@MW2PR00MB0396.namprd00.prod.outlook.com> <12503.1552447661@localhost> <58E37DB5-098C-4387-9A52-4AECD0F69F25@island-resort.com> <6495.1553219901@dooku.sandelman.ca> <BA6E28A7-0F6A-46A8-AB1B-A64B9229F149@intel.com> <507.1553725386@dooku.sandelman.ca> <24C0968B-32B0-4EF1-99C8-61D3F0955BA1@intel.com> <793F9A34-050F-4914-AF4B-08C072730A06@island-resort.com> <D8C23800.D851F%carl@redhoundsoftware.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Carl Wallace <carl@redhoundsoftware.com> message dated "Thu, 28 Mar 2019 08:41:33 -0400."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2019 12:04:50 +0100
Message-ID: <19652.1553943890@dooku.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/sIJM4xLdxo2B_EMgAN2vB9ttvFs>
Subject: Re: [Rats] More use cases for draft-richardson-rats-usecases-00
X-BeenThere: rats@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Remote Attestation Procedures <rats.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats/>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2019 11:04:49 -0000

Carl Wallace <carl@redhoundsoftware.com> wrote:
    > Example attestations from Android devices, Yubikey devices and Surface
    > Pro virtual smart cards can be found here:
    > https://github.com/Purebred/SampleAttestations. These are accompanied
    > by SCEP requests that include the attestations and the resulting
    > certificates. The attestations were generated and used as part of
    > issuing device and end user certificates where the public key was the
    > focus of the attestation. The Android and Yubikey attestations take the
    > form of X.509 certificates (packaged as certs-only SignedData). The
    > Surface Pro attestations take the form of CMC requests.

I think that seeing the examples is very useful to extract common pieces.
Do you think it's useful to include some in the use case document?

-- 
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-