Re: [Rats] Android attestations: Re: draft-richardson-rats-usecases-00 comments

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 19 June 2019 02:31 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A45F412047A for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 19:31:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=1.5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KGyE3APKQNqE for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 19:31:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [IPv6:2a01:7e00::f03c:91ff:feae:de77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6CDB12043E for <rats@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 19:31:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (unknown [75.98.19.132]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C1931F450; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 02:31:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id AD9F61328; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 22:31:42 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
cc: Thomas Fossati <Thomas.Fossati@arm.com>, Laurence Lundblade <lgl@island-resort.com>, "rats@ietf.org" <rats@ietf.org>, Anthony Nadalin <tonynad=40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <bf003513-209a-7d5f-a9a5-58ade6c23545@gmail.com>
References: <MW2PR00MB03963ABEB87211AD28A16240A6490@MW2PR00MB0396.namprd00.prod.outlook.com> <12503.1552447661@localhost> <219648D6-188A-429D-A13F-ED6155DE9016@island-resort.com> <14288.1553710783@dooku.sandelman.ca> <4EB6FF13-2DAF-4BDC-AC90-C46720D61AF0@arm.com> <bf003513-209a-7d5f-a9a5-58ade6c23545@gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com> message dated "Fri, 19 Apr 2019 08:08:10 +0200."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 22:31:42 -0400
Message-ID: <21417.1560911502@dooku.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/WkrMaSC6RSO7v5LXpCninNzFpdM>
Subject: Re: [Rats] Android attestations: Re: draft-richardson-rats-usecases-00 comments
X-BeenThere: rats@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Remote Attestation Procedures <rats.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats/>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 02:31:52 -0000

Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com> wrote:
    > Here you have another link:
    > https://developer.android.com/training/articles/security-key-attestation

    > As an application developer I find this scheme and the associated
    > "AndroidKeyStore" quite impractical.  The recent addition of
    > "StrongBox" makes it worse.

Interesting. What is it that you find that you can not do?

    > With a two-level TEE/SE session-key based scheme you only need to
    > attest the session permitting you to perform any number of secure
    > operations and close the session with a "commit" which in turn responds
    > with a (session signed) message to the SP that everything went right.

Or is this what you wish you had?


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-