IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Rats] More use cases for draft-richardson-rats-usecases-00

Laurence Lundblade <lgl@island-resort.com> Wed, 20 March 2019 19:05 UTC

Return-Path: <lgl@island-resort.com>
X-Original-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40D431310CC for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 12:05:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZrA88r9WJUu2 for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 12:05:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p3plsmtpa09-06.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtpa09-06.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [173.201.193.235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1878F1200B3 for <rats@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 12:05:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.82] ([76.192.164.238]) by :SMTPAUTH: with ESMTPSA id 6gWshoad5dwXW6gWvhLSm0; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 12:05:37 -0700
From: Laurence Lundblade <lgl@island-resort.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 12:05:34 -0700
References: <MW2PR00MB03963ABEB87211AD28A16240A6490@MW2PR00MB0396.namprd00.prod.outlook.com> <12503.1552447661@localhost>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, "rats@ietf.org" <rats@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <12503.1552447661@localhost>
Message-Id: <58E37DB5-098C-4387-9A52-4AECD0F69F25@island-resort.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfA12Er/2vnRjCSMB5ZPyP+UaraaTDBPz0jTu437Hq/lNrtwfJ/iRHBHAEx/wuxSRHvvYsvyIwHfgUF/Nw4CoupxaqT8xk67OkCaPyncuQeaprp9SGRtq tc2QfVMlvWwse/A4Ibupm+tjDMXXLrqveklrOJM7R0aZ4uONZXMswSeNVdGxpZfDdiH1PpNujeMVIxYex7pN6aU0p7OE/p0s0Vw=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/U35expYxtowuQIwv5eo-40V-Gjo>
Subject: [Rats] More use cases for draft-richardson-rats-usecases-00
X-BeenThere: rats@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Remote Attestation Procedures <rats.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats/>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 19:05:40 -0000

Just briefly,

The TCG use case seems more like a description of technology than a use case. 

There is the Cisco / Network Function use case that is oriented around the list of SW components and measurement of them. Eric Voit is the man for that I think. Henk and a few others were also into it.

I also think there is at least one IoT use case. Maybe it is one with very many sub use cases. The main issue there is on boarding devices to an IoT management platform that have been drop-shipped or sent straight to the consumer or such.

LL

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email