IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Rats] 答复: More use cases for draft-richardson-rats-usecases-00

"Xialiang (Frank, Network Standard & Patent Dept)" <frank.xialiang@huawei.com> Sat, 23 March 2019 08:55 UTC

Return-Path: <frank.xialiang@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC941127AC2 for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Mar 2019 01:55:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wWyY_1wWHsBj for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Mar 2019 01:55:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D8C612785F for <rats@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Mar 2019 01:55:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 94142503F92B64403CDA for <rats@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Mar 2019 08:55:49 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from DGGEMM404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.20.212) by lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Sat, 23 Mar 2019 08:55:49 +0000
Received: from DGGEMM511-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.21]) by DGGEMM404-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.3.20.212]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Sat, 23 Mar 2019 16:55:44 +0800
From: "Xialiang (Frank, Network Standard & Patent Dept)" <frank.xialiang@huawei.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, Laurence Lundblade <lgl@island-resort.com>
CC: "rats@ietf.org" <rats@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Rats] More use cases for draft-richardson-rats-usecases-00
Thread-Index: AQHU30/w+KeEvHV4r0SWcPzBrYhUNKYWYLeAgAKMmCA=
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 08:55:43 +0000
Message-ID: <C02846B1344F344EB4FAA6FA7AF481F12CA156DF@dggemm511-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <MW2PR00MB03963ABEB87211AD28A16240A6490@MW2PR00MB0396.namprd00.prod.outlook.com> <12503.1552447661@localhost> <58E37DB5-098C-4387-9A52-4AECD0F69F25@island-resort.com> <6495.1553219901@dooku.sandelman.ca>
In-Reply-To: <6495.1553219901@dooku.sandelman.ca>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.220.65.77]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/vmoFxdBwoUhXY-6ri0Uz8uQMIaE>
Subject: [Rats] 答复: More use cases for draft-richardson-rats-usecases-00
X-BeenThere: rats@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Remote Attestation Procedures <rats.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats/>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 08:55:56 -0000

Hi Michael,
Maybe you can reference to this:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/103/materials/slides-103-rats-compromise-trustworthy-visibility-in-working-systems-00

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: RATS [mailto:rats-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Michael Richardson
发送时间: 2019年3月22日 9:58
收件人: Laurence Lundblade <lgl@island-resort.com>
抄送: rats@ietf.org
主题: Re: [Rats] More use cases for draft-richardson-rats-usecases-00


Laurence Lundblade <lgl@island-resort.com> wrote:
    > The TCG use case seems more like a description of technology than a use
    > case.

yes, I was given a document in progress, and I felt it was very difficult to determine what the use case was exactly.
I also felt it was  important to write something down to ferret out the target.

But, in particular what I saw was that it was more about attesting to the integrity of physical systems in an enterprise rather than, for instance, attesting to absense of holes for video to escape into.
I gather you did not get this from my text, so I will attempt to improve it.

    > There is the Cisco / Network Function use case that is oriented around
    > the list of SW components and measurement of them. Eric Voit is the man
    > for that I think. Henk and a few others were also into it.

    > I also think there is at least one IoT use case. Maybe it is one with
    > very many sub use cases. The main issue there is on boarding devices to
    > an IoT management platform that have been drop-shipped or sent straight
    > to the consumer or such.

Are there documents you can refer me to?

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works  -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email