Re: [rrg] Recommendation and what happens next

Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au> Wed, 10 March 2010 07:02 UTC

Return-Path: <rw@firstpr.com.au>
X-Original-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDBEF3A6A58 for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Mar 2010 23:02:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.837
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.837 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.058, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_AU=0.377, HOST_EQ_AU=0.327]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mSxXMQuXWthw for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Mar 2010 23:02:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gair.firstpr.com.au (gair.firstpr.com.au [150.101.162.123]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FC663A6832 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 9 Mar 2010 23:02:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.0.6] (wira.firstpr.com.au [10.0.0.6]) by gair.firstpr.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 680ED175D9E; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:02:14 +1100 (EST)
Message-ID: <4B9743F9.60407@firstpr.com.au>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:02:17 +1100
From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
Organization: First Principles
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: RRG <rrg@irtf.org>
References: <C7BA8F3A.5141%tony.li@tony.li> <4B970AC6.1080109@firstpr.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <4B970AC6.1080109@firstpr.com.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [rrg] Recommendation and what happens next
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 07:02:14 -0000

Here's a revised last few words for a paragraph in my previous
message in this thread:

I regard your unexplained dismissal of my contributions to the RRG -
and to the report you and Lixia are primarily responsible for - as
ungracious, unfounded and unbecoming of the position of co-chair.

and some additions:

Is it just my contributions you have such a dim view of?  Can you
nominate some people whose work you think has made a useful
contribution to the RRG?  There's been 6,243 messages, plus the
presentations at meetings, IDs and other documents.

Since you don't promise to alter your and Lixia's Recommendation
based on input from other people, do you actually want input for this
purpose?

Could you give an indication of any aspects of what you are planning
to recommend which might be affected by what an RRG member might
write on the list or say in forthcoming meeting?

  - Robin