Re: [rrg] Why won't supporters of Loc/ID Separation (CEE) argue their case?
Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com> Wed, 10 March 2010 17:25 UTC
Return-Path: <scott.brim@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 040E03A695F for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:25:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, GB_I_LETTER=-2]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9PT8N+2zIw3h for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:25:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qy0-f200.google.com (mail-qy0-f200.google.com [209.85.221.200]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 053A23A6885 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:25:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by qyk38 with SMTP id 38so5907232qyk.27 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:25:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uZygdCaJNF9rphZNYH2nUdeE9xDyB8KSsbCOFeyaS1w=; b=YggRvsJVFH7BgOYK5y4IuKgmBXBRhVvF92ZlpjB1O+HkrvaBuy3tbynpC+6tYvVDjx kE2I8Whe6eTXJdix5bfOZfekr/qmnAvcs5s9sGk5vLiDvsIE0/lc4MZ2hSqwr+XPUa/k mtPLlAMkOOSuJJNUN1DxzsQyToVA631gat8OA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=jOs5jly4fPnoGjFft09CGemCYyQMeqCThK6fq8bELe94tog62uBFxxjMnMviVCklMA H7eBCL9VQ2mDmaujtoQmnXhXPCRzqhHphJMa4RT1Xaw+NXbVreOg1FUjoYQACC3UoeMd UY8/XENAegerE6G77KKAl0jGxM8HTMlhwTgZ8=
Received: by 10.224.79.72 with SMTP id o8mr1323601qak.99.1268241929392; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:25:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sbrim-mbp.local (198-135-0-233.cisco.com [198.135.0.233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 26sm19014706qwa.38.2010.03.10.09.25.25 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:25:25 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4B97D602.6050303@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:25:22 -0500
From: Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
References: <C7B9BCE8.4FA7%tony.li@tony.li> <4B94D6EA.3000800@firstpr.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <4B94D6EA.3000800@firstpr.com.au>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: RRG <rrg@irtf.org>, Ran Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [rrg] Why won't supporters of Loc/ID Separation (CEE) argue their case?
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:25:30 -0000
Robin Whittle allegedly wrote on 03/08/2010 05:52 EST: >> I reject the classification of CEE vs CES. To me that division is about as >> useful as the set of proposals that begin with the letter 'I'. Sure, it's a >> division, but it doesn't really tell us anything insightful about the >> solution space. > > OK - this is your view. Like Ran, Joel and Lixia who have also > expressed this view, you haven't written to the list why you regard > this distinction as being of no architectural or practical > significance. > > Other people think it is an important and meaningful distinction. To > see why I think it is architecturally important please see the > messages I link to in msg06187. My attempt to trace the history of > the terms and to discuss some ambiguities in what is being > "separated" in Core-Edge Separation can be found in msg06110. CES/CEE is a useful dimension for comparison but (1) it's not binary, despite our wishes, and (2) there are other dimensions that are also important. We just couldn't figure out how to use them for effective comparisons. See the various taxonomy attempts. Scott
- [rrg] FW: I-D Action:draft-irtf-rrg-recommendatio… Tony Li
- [rrg] Recommendation and what happens next Robin Whittle
- Re: [rrg] FW: I-D Action:draft-irtf-rrg-recommend… Robin Whittle
- Re: [rrg] Recommendation and what happens next Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] FW: I-D Action:draft-irtf-rrg-recommend… Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] FW: I-D Action:draft-irtf-rrg-recommend… Robin Whittle
- Re: [rrg] Recommendation and what happens next Robin Whittle
- Re: [rrg] FW: I-D Action:draft-irtf-rrg-recommend… Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] Recommendation and what happens next Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] Recommendation and what happens next Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rrg] Recommendation and what happens next Tony Li
- [rrg] Why won't supporters of Loc/ID Separation (… Robin Whittle
- Re: [rrg] Recommendation and what happens next Robin Whittle
- Re: [rrg] Why won't supporters of Loc/ID Separati… Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] Recommendation and what happens next Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] Recommendation and what happens next Robin Whittle
- Re: [rrg] Why won't supporters of Loc/ID Separati… Robin Whittle
- Re: [rrg] Recommendation and what happens next Russ White
- Re: [rrg] Recommendation and what happens next Templin, Fred L
- Re: [rrg] Recommendation and what happens next Templin, Fred L
- [rrg] IRON-RANGER scalability and support for pac… Robin Whittle
- Re: [rrg] IRON-RANGER scalability and support for… Templin, Fred L
- Re: [rrg] Recommendation and what happens next Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] Why won't supporters of Loc/ID Separati… Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] Recommendation and what happens next Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rrg] Recommendation and what happens next Scott Brim
- Re: [rrg] Recommendation and what happens next Templin, Fred L
- Re: [rrg] IRON-RANGER scalability and support for… Robin Whittle
- Re: [rrg] Recommendation and what happens next Robin Whittle
- Re: [rrg] Recommendation and what happens next Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] Recommendation and what happens next Robin Whittle
- Re: [rrg] Recommendation and what happens next Robin Whittle
- Re: [rrg] Recommendation and what happens next Scott Brim
- Re: [rrg] Why won't supporters of Loc/ID Separati… Scott Brim
- Re: [rrg] Why won't supporters of Loc/ID Separati… Robin Whittle
- Re: [rrg] IRON-RANGER scalability and support for… Templin, Fred L
- Re: [rrg] Recommendation and what happens next Templin, Fred L
- Re: [rrg] Why won't supporters of Loc/ID Separati… Templin, Fred L
- Re: [rrg] Recommendation and what happens next Scott Brim
- Re: [rrg] IRON-RANGER scalability and support for… Robin Whittle
- Re: [rrg] IRON-RANGER scalability and support for… Templin, Fred L
- Re: [rrg] IRON-RANGER scalability and support for… Robin Whittle
- Re: [rrg] IRON-RANGER scalability and support for… Templin, Fred L
- Re: [rrg] IRON-RANGER scalability and support for… Robin Whittle
- Re: [rrg] IRON-RANGER scalability and support for… Templin, Fred L
- Re: [rrg] IRON-RANGER scalability and support for… Robin Whittle
- Re: [rrg] IRON-RANGER scalability and support for… Templin, Fred L
- Re: [rrg] IRON-RANGER scalability and support for… Robin Whittle
- Re: [rrg] IRON-RANGER scalability and support for… Templin, Fred L
- Re: [rrg] IRON-RANGER scalability and support for… Robin Whittle
- Re: [rrg] IRON-RANGER scalability and support for… Templin, Fred L
- [rrg] Comments on 'draft-whittle-ivip-arch' Templin, Fred L
- Re: [rrg] Comments on 'draft-whittle-ivip-arch' Robin Whittle
- Re: [rrg] Comments on 'draft-whittle-ivip-arch' Robin Whittle