IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rrg] Recommendation and what happens next

Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> Sun, 07 March 2010 20:51 UTC

Return-Path: <tony.li@tony.li>
X-Original-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE8353A918D for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Mar 2010 12:51:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.969
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.969 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.630, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AvPPn-QzWdlO for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Mar 2010 12:51:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from qmta08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.80]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A181F3A900E for <rrg@irtf.org>; Sun, 7 Mar 2010 12:51:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from omta18.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.90]) by qmta08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id qLcJ1d0061wpRvQ58LrPnK; Sun, 07 Mar 2010 20:51:23 +0000
Received: from [10.21.65.6] ([128.107.239.233]) by omta18.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id qLtD1d00F52qHCY3eLtLY0; Sun, 07 Mar 2010 20:53:29 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.23.0.091001
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2010 12:51:03 -0800
From: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <C7B951B7.4F5D%tony.li@tony.li>
Thread-Topic: [rrg] Recommendation and what happens next
Thread-Index: Acq+N+ZQoaBdwMOk80qplZE0l5ZNkw==
In-Reply-To: <4B9406FD.8090106@gmail.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Cc: RRG <rrg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [rrg] Recommendation and what happens next
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2010 20:51:19 -0000

>> ...Our job is to present the IESG with a path.
> 
> Only one path? As far as I can see, the arguments are rather
> evenly balanced, and some of the choices are complementary,
> or at least could co-exist.


Yes, a path.  Not necessarily a single proposal, but a clear plan.  From the
charter:

    The group will produce ... a recommendation for a routing and addressing
    architecture.

It doesn't say "a set of possible architectures" or "some vague things that
we could do".  

Again, our job is to make a decision and that's what we're going to do.

Tony

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email