Re: [rrg] Next topic?

marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo@it.uc3m.es> Thu, 12 May 2011 05:26 UTC

Return-Path: <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>
X-Original-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 354A0E06A6 for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:26:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q2eF8ffiJj54 for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:26:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp02.uc3m.es (smtp02.uc3m.es [163.117.176.132]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40B1AE0689 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:26:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-uc3m-safe: yes
Received: from marcelo-bagnulos-macbook-pro-2.local (216.219-78-194.adsl-static.isp.belgacom.be [194.78.219.216]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp02.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85E79704064; Thu, 12 May 2011 07:26:37 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4DCB6F88.1080807@it.uc3m.es>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 07:26:32 +0200
From: marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; es-ES; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
References: <06B61955-CA9F-4CE7-9DA3-6DA8ECF6CD07@cisco.com> <4DC90101.50403@it.uc3m.es> <69F152CB-2FAF-4569-B0BF-1F97BB5A845E@tony.li>
In-Reply-To: <69F152CB-2FAF-4569-B0BF-1F97BB5A845E@tony.li>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.0.0.3116-6.5.0.1024-18130.003
Cc: rrg@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [rrg] Next topic?
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 05:26:46 -0000

Ok, let me try to coordinate with others to produce some first draft of 
this probably during next week, is that ok?



El 12/05/11 1:06, Tony Li escribió:
> On May 10, 2011, at 2:10 AM, marcelo bagnulo braun wrote:
>
>> What about doing some work in multi-path routing in the inter-domain?
>> i.e. enabling a router to use multiple paths with potential different characteristics to forward packets across domains.
>> Would people find this topic interesting?
>
> It looks like there are a number of people who are at least somewhat interested in this topic.
>
> To move this topic forward, it would be very good to have a very clear statement of what this would (and would not) involve as research goals, and the specific researchers who are interested in contributing to this effort.  Obviously, much of this topic might involve direct protocol modifications or mechanism proposals.  These would be inappropriate as research goals, as these would be overlapping with the work that the IETF is chartered to perform.  Answering architectural questions would be appropriate, IMHO.
>
> Folks writing topic proposals might do so with an eye on the current RRG charter.  Any eventual topics will necessarily become part of our rechartering effort.
>
> Tony
>
>