Re: [rrg] Next topic?

marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo@it.uc3m.es> Tue, 10 May 2011 09:34 UTC

Return-Path: <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>
X-Original-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15D56E06DC for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 May 2011 02:34:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AFOCTWd0QB1V for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 May 2011 02:34:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp02.uc3m.es (smtp02.uc3m.es [163.117.176.132]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAC9DE071B for <rrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 10 May 2011 02:34:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-uc3m-safe: yes
Received: from marcelo-bagnulos-macbook-pro-2.local (wlap005.it.uc3m.es [163.117.139.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp02.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8EEA75A3D9 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 10 May 2011 11:10:26 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4DC90101.50403@it.uc3m.es>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 11:10:25 +0200
From: marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; es-ES; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rrg@irtf.org
References: <06B61955-CA9F-4CE7-9DA3-6DA8ECF6CD07@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <06B61955-CA9F-4CE7-9DA3-6DA8ECF6CD07@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.0.0.3116-6.5.0.1024-18126.006
Subject: Re: [rrg] Next topic?
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 09:34:31 -0000

Hi,

What about doing some work in multi-path routing in the inter-domain?
i.e. enabling a router to use multiple paths with potential different 
characteristics to forward packets across domains.
Would people find this topic interesting?

regards, marcelo



El 08/05/11 19:18, Tony Li escribió:
> Hi all,
>
> It's time to start the conversation about where the RRG is headed.  Towards that end, I'd like to open the floor for the discussion of topics.  Any _research_ topic within the broad area of routing and addressing is appropriate.
>
> I propose the following process: we hold this discussion this month, trying to identify relevant topics.  Each topic should have a succinct statement of its goals.  At the end of the month, we poll to determine the interest level in the various topics.  Those that seem to have critical mass are recommended to the IRTF Chair for consideration.
>
> The default answer, if no topic has critical mass, is for the RG to go on hiatus.
>
> Any questions or comments on the process?
>
> Any proposals of research topics?
>
> The floor is open...
>
> Tony
>
> _______________________________________________
> rrg mailing list
> rrg@irtf.org
> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
>