Re: [rrg] Next topic?

Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> Thu, 12 May 2011 06:53 UTC

Return-Path: <tony.li@tony.li>
X-Original-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5837AE06FB for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 May 2011 23:53:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hUlHRSnfNmfJ for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 May 2011 23:52:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from qmta04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96286E0675 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 11 May 2011 23:52:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omta20.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.87]) by qmta04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id iWgo1g0021smiN4A4WszL5; Thu, 12 May 2011 06:52:59 +0000
Received: from [192.168.2.100] ([98.248.36.188]) by omta20.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id iWsw1g00Y43ZcXW8gWsyDE; Thu, 12 May 2011 06:52:58 +0000
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
In-Reply-To: <4DCB6F88.1080807@it.uc3m.es>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 23:52:56 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <81A1DDDC-8CFA-4613-BFE2-F93FD28C900A@tony.li>
References: <06B61955-CA9F-4CE7-9DA3-6DA8ECF6CD07@cisco.com> <4DC90101.50403@it.uc3m.es> <69F152CB-2FAF-4569-B0BF-1F97BB5A845E@tony.li> <4DCB6F88.1080807@it.uc3m.es>
To: marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: rrg@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [rrg] Next topic?
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 06:53:00 -0000

That should be fine, thanks.  Again, I'd like to move forward with all proposals by the end of the month.

Tony

On May 11, 2011, at 10:26 PM, marcelo bagnulo braun wrote:

> Ok, let me try to coordinate with others to produce some first draft of this probably during next week, is that ok?
> 
> 
> 
> El 12/05/11 1:06, Tony Li escribió:
>> On May 10, 2011, at 2:10 AM, marcelo bagnulo braun wrote:
>> 
>>> What about doing some work in multi-path routing in the inter-domain?
>>> i.e. enabling a router to use multiple paths with potential different characteristics to forward packets across domains.
>>> Would people find this topic interesting?
>> 
>> It looks like there are a number of people who are at least somewhat interested in this topic.
>> 
>> To move this topic forward, it would be very good to have a very clear statement of what this would (and would not) involve as research goals, and the specific researchers who are interested in contributing to this effort.  Obviously, much of this topic might involve direct protocol modifications or mechanism proposals.  These would be inappropriate as research goals, as these would be overlapping with the work that the IETF is chartered to perform.  Answering architectural questions would be appropriate, IMHO.
>> 
>> Folks writing topic proposals might do so with an eye on the current RRG charter.  Any eventual topics will necessarily become part of our rechartering effort.
>> 
>> Tony
>> 
>> 
>