Re: [rrg] Next topic?

"Flinck, Hannu (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <hannu.flinck@nsn.com> Tue, 10 May 2011 12:19 UTC

Return-Path: <hannu.flinck@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C37F0E0759 for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 May 2011 05:19:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4fQt3o+pfyi9 for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 May 2011 05:19:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (demumfd001.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.32]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF268E0708 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 10 May 2011 05:19:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.55]) by demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id p4AC3VNF029979 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 10 May 2011 14:03:33 +0200
Received: from demuexc025.nsn-intra.net (demuexc025.nsn-intra.net [10.159.32.12]) by demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id p4AC3UGv010311; Tue, 10 May 2011 14:03:30 +0200
Received: from FIESEXC035.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.0.25]) by demuexc025.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 10 May 2011 14:03:30 +0200
x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 15:03:28 +0300
Message-ID: <26E5D1C5D5365D47B147E5E62FC7358502D9D4B3@FIESEXC035.nsn-intra.net>
In-Reply-To: <4DC90101.50403@it.uc3m.es>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [rrg] Next topic?
thread-index: AcwO9Y1T7Iozd7pFQ+6Bjcm+4jEPvQAFH67w
References: <06B61955-CA9F-4CE7-9DA3-6DA8ECF6CD07@cisco.com> <4DC90101.50403@it.uc3m.es>
From: "Flinck, Hannu (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <hannu.flinck@nsn.com>
To: ext marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>, rrg@irtf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 May 2011 12:03:30.0262 (UTC) FILETIME=[4706CF60:01CC0F0A]
Subject: Re: [rrg] Next topic?
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 12:19:37 -0000

Hello Marcelo,

In fact I happen to be working on the topic you are suggesting. I am interested and willing to contribute. Should we have an initial state of the art description?

- Hannu 

-----Original Message-----
From: rrg-bounces@irtf.org [mailto:rrg-bounces@irtf.org] On Behalf Of ext marcelo bagnulo braun
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 12:10 PM
To: rrg@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [rrg] Next topic?

Hi,

What about doing some work in multi-path routing in the inter-domain?
i.e. enabling a router to use multiple paths with potential different 
characteristics to forward packets across domains.
Would people find this topic interesting?

regards, marcelo



El 08/05/11 19:18, Tony Li escribió:
> Hi all,
>
> It's time to start the conversation about where the RRG is headed.  Towards that end, I'd like to open the floor for the discussion of topics.  Any _research_ topic within the broad area of routing and addressing is appropriate.
>
> I propose the following process: we hold this discussion this month, trying to identify relevant topics.  Each topic should have a succinct statement of its goals.  At the end of the month, we poll to determine the interest level in the various topics.  Those that seem to have critical mass are recommended to the IRTF Chair for consideration.
>
> The default answer, if no topic has critical mass, is for the RG to go on hiatus.
>
> Any questions or comments on the process?
>
> Any proposals of research topics?
>
> The floor is open...
>
> Tony
>
> _______________________________________________
> rrg mailing list
> rrg@irtf.org
> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
>

_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
rrg@irtf.org
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg