IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rrg] Next topic?

Benno Overeinder <benno@NLnetLabs.nl> Mon, 16 May 2011 10:18 UTC

Return-Path: <benno@NLnetLabs.nl>
X-Original-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4181BE06A1 for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 May 2011 03:18:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R9zgRp1+-1iA for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 May 2011 03:18:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from open.nlnetlabs.nl (open.nlnetlabs.nl [IPv6:2001:7b8:206:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F1ECE069A for <rrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 16 May 2011 03:18:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aluminum.nlnetlabs.nl (aluminum.nlnetlabs.nl [IPv6:2001:7b8:206:1:21b:63ff:feb8:a9eb]) (authenticated bits=0) by open.nlnetlabs.nl (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p4GAIeM9092123 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 16 May 2011 12:18:41 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from benno@NLnetLabs.nl)
Message-ID: <4DD0FA00.6060605@NLnetLabs.nl>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 12:18:40 +0200
From: Benno Overeinder <benno@NLnetLabs.nl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rrg@irtf.org, marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>
References: <06B61955-CA9F-4CE7-9DA3-6DA8ECF6CD07@cisco.com> <4DC90101.50403@it.uc3m.es> <69F152CB-2FAF-4569-B0BF-1F97BB5A845E@tony.li> <4DCB6F88.1080807@it.uc3m.es>
In-Reply-To: <4DCB6F88.1080807@it.uc3m.es>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (open.nlnetlabs.nl [IPv6:2001:7b8:206:1::1]); Mon, 16 May 2011 12:18:41 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: [rrg] Next topic?
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 10:18:45 -0000

On 5/12/11 7:26 AM, marcelo bagnulo braun wrote:
> Ok, let me try to coordinate with others to produce some first draft of
> this probably during next week, is that ok?
> 

We are running some simulation experiments to get insight in the
scalability (number of BGP update messages and maybe later the
convergence time) and path diversity/disjointness of different
multi-path routing proposals.  We are trying to get an answer what the
practical implications are of the deployment of multi-path routing on
current Internet AS-topology (and the past topologies from 2004 onwards).

If these are interesting questions to put in the draft, I am more than
happy to give more details, etc.

Cheers,

-- Benno


-- 
Benno J. Overeinder
NLnet Labs
http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email