Re: [rrg] Next topic?
"Flinck, Hannu (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <hannu.flinck@nsn.com> Tue, 10 May 2011 14:38 UTC
Return-Path: <hannu.flinck@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25EC4E0738 for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 May 2011 07:38:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.479
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.479 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.119, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c0Frx8bzqDMp for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 May 2011 07:38:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (demumfd002.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5E47E0659 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 10 May 2011 07:38:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.56]) by demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id p4AC55KB028253 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 10 May 2011 14:05:05 +0200
Received: from demuexc025.nsn-intra.net (demuexc025.nsn-intra.net [10.159.32.12]) by demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id p4AC5545000572; Tue, 10 May 2011 14:05:05 +0200
Received: from FIESEXC035.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.0.25]) by demuexc025.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 10 May 2011 14:05:04 +0200
x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CC0F0A.7F483CEF"
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 15:05:03 +0300
Message-ID: <26E5D1C5D5365D47B147E5E62FC7358502D9D4B9@FIESEXC035.nsn-intra.net>
In-Reply-To: <8CDDD1056BE3DA2-1160-DD4@webmail-m046.sysops.aol.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [rrg] Next topic?
thread-index: AcwO+Vcx096rqHn+RxONAeZrhjY0wgAEPWNg
References: <06B61955-CA9F-4CE7-9DA3-6DA8ECF6CD07@cisco.com><4DC90101.50403@it.uc3m.es> <8CDDD1056BE3DA2-1160-DD4@webmail-m046.sysops.aol.com>
From: "Flinck, Hannu (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <hannu.flinck@nsn.com>
To: heinerhummel@aol.com, marcelo@it.uc3m.es, rrg@irtf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 May 2011 12:05:04.0758 (UTC) FILETIME=[7F59C160:01CC0F0A]
Subject: Re: [rrg] Next topic?
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 14:38:45 -0000
Based on my reading of TARA it was all about geographical addressing. - Hannu From: rrg-bounces@irtf.org [mailto:rrg-bounces@irtf.org] On Behalf Of ext heinerhummel@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 1:01 PM To: marcelo@it.uc3m.es; rrg@irtf.org Subject: Re: [rrg] Next topic? Obviously no one, because this was a main goal of ignored TARA: multipath forwarding based on a network graph which is composed of inter- AND intra-network links and which not only comprises ECMPs but also detouring paths via equidistant or even more remote routers. Heiner -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- Von: marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo@it.uc3m.es> An: rrg@irtf.org Verschickt: Di., 10. Mai. 2011, 11:10 Thema: Re: [rrg] Next topic? Hi, What about doing some work in multi-path routing in the inter-domain? i.e. enabling a router to use multiple paths with potential different characteristics to forward packets across domains. Would people find this topic interesting? regards, marcelo El 08/05/11 19:18, Tony Li escribió: > Hi all, > > It's time to start the conversation about where the RRG is headed. Towards that end, I'd like to open the floor for the discussion of topics. Any _research_ topic within the broad area of routing and addressing is appropriate. > > I propose the following process: we hold this discussion this month, trying to identify relevant topics. Each topic should have a succinct statement of its goals. At the end of the month, we poll to determine the interest level in the various topics. Those that seem to have critical mass are recommended to the IRTF Chair for consideration. > > The default answer, if no topic has critical mass, is for the RG to go on hiatus. > > Any questions or comments on the process? > > Any proposals of research topics? > > The floor is open... > > Tony > > _______________________________________________ > rrg mailing list > rrg@irtf.org > http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg > _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list rrg@irtf.org http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
- Re: [rrg] Next topic? Noel Chiappa
- Re: [rrg] Next topic? Sampo Syreeni
- [rrg] Next topic? Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] Next topic? Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] Next topic? marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [rrg] Next topic? heinerhummel
- Re: [rrg] Next topic? Flinck, Hannu (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [rrg] Next topic? Christopher Pluntke
- Re: [rrg] Next topic? Flinck, Hannu (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [rrg] Next topic? Sampo Syreeni
- Re: [rrg] Next topic? heinerhummel
- Re: [rrg] Next topic? Jose Manuel Camacho Camacho
- Re: [rrg] Next topic? Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] Next topic? marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [rrg] Next topic? Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] Next topic? Xu Xiaohu
- Re: [rrg] Next topic? Michael K. Smith - Adhost
- Re: [rrg] Next topic? Katsushi Kobayashi
- Re: [rrg] Next topic? Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] Next topic? Patrick Frejborg
- Re: [rrg] Next topic? Benno Overeinder
- Re: [rrg] Next topic? heinerhummel
- Re: [rrg] Next topic? Loránd Jakab
- Re: [rrg] Next topic? heinerhummel
- Re: [rrg] Next topic? Xu Xiaohu
- Re: [rrg] Next topic? Pedro Andrés Aranda Gutiérrez
- Re: [rrg] Next topic? Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] Next topic? Katsushi Kobayashi
- Re: [rrg] Next topic? HeinerHummel
- Re: [rrg] Next topic? HeinerHummel
- Re: [rrg] Next topic? Scott Brim
- Re: [rrg] Next topic? Scott Brim
- Re: [rrg] Next topic? Scott Brim
- Re: [rrg] Next topic? Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [rrg] Next topic? heinerhummel
- Re: [rrg] Next topic? heinerhummel
- Re: [rrg] Next topic? heinerhummel