Re: [rrg] Next topic?

Christopher Pluntke <c.pluntke@ucl.ac.uk> Tue, 10 May 2011 13:02 UTC

Return-Path: <c.pluntke@ucl.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72EA4E06AF for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 May 2011 06:02:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.191
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.191 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.408, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lj-vYMwzUBUA for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 May 2011 06:02:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vscani-d2.ucl.ac.uk (vscani-d2.ucl.ac.uk [144.82.108.133]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCCC5E0662 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 10 May 2011 06:02:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nat-ee.ucl.ac.uk ([128.40.255.50] helo=[172.16.0.138]) by vscani-d.ucl.ac.uk with esmtps (SSLv3:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <c.pluntke@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1QJmZn-0006be-Fn; Tue, 10 May 2011 14:02:11 +0100
From: Christopher Pluntke <c.pluntke@ucl.ac.uk>
To: "Flinck, Hannu (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <hannu.flinck@nsn.com>
In-Reply-To: <26E5D1C5D5365D47B147E5E62FC7358502D9D4B3@FIESEXC035.nsn-intra.net>
References: <06B61955-CA9F-4CE7-9DA3-6DA8ECF6CD07@cisco.com> <4DC90101.50403@it.uc3m.es> <26E5D1C5D5365D47B147E5E62FC7358502D9D4B3@FIESEXC035.nsn-intra.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 14:02:10 +0100
Message-ID: <1305032530.2182.8.camel@nano>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-UCL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the UCL Helpdesk, helpdesk@ucl.ac.uk for more information
X-UCL-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-UCL-MailScanner-From: c.pluntke@ucl.ac.uk
Cc: rrg@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [rrg] Next topic?
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 13:02:19 -0000

Hi,

I think there are many interesting problems to be explored in the
context of inter-domain multipath routing. Having mainly done work on
intra-domain multipath routing so far, I would be very interested in
looking at this as well.

Christopher

On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 15:03 +0300, Flinck, Hannu (NSN - FI/Espoo) wrote:
> Hello Marcelo,
> 
> In fact I happen to be working on the topic you are suggesting. I am interested and willing to contribute. Should we have an initial state of the art description?
> 
> - Hannu 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rrg-bounces@irtf.org [mailto:rrg-bounces@irtf.org] On Behalf Of ext marcelo bagnulo braun
> Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 12:10 PM
> To: rrg@irtf.org
> Subject: Re: [rrg] Next topic?
> 
> Hi,
> 
> What about doing some work in multi-path routing in the inter-domain?
> i.e. enabling a router to use multiple paths with potential different 
> characteristics to forward packets across domains.
> Would people find this topic interesting?
> 
> regards, marcelo
> 
> 
> 
> El 08/05/11 19:18, Tony Li escribió:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > It's time to start the conversation about where the RRG is headed.  Towards that end, I'd like to open the floor for the discussion of topics.  Any _research_ topic within the broad area of routing and addressing is appropriate.
> >
> > I propose the following process: we hold this discussion this month, trying to identify relevant topics.  Each topic should have a succinct statement of its goals.  At the end of the month, we poll to determine the interest level in the various topics.  Those that seem to have critical mass are recommended to the IRTF Chair for consideration.
> >
> > The default answer, if no topic has critical mass, is for the RG to go on hiatus.
> >
> > Any questions or comments on the process?
> >
> > Any proposals of research topics?
> >
> > The floor is open...
> >
> > Tony
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rrg mailing list
> > rrg@irtf.org
> > http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rrg mailing list
> rrg@irtf.org
> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
> _______________________________________________
> rrg mailing list
> rrg@irtf.org
> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg