Re: [rtcweb] Update of future interim meeting locations

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com> Mon, 16 April 2012 21:18 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D16211E808A for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 14:18:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -108.921
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-108.921 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.678, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R4U6Zv+T37vB for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 14:18:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtv-iport-3.cisco.com (mtv-iport-3.cisco.com [173.36.130.14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E274421F858D for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 14:18:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=fluffy@cisco.com; l=1861; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1334611116; x=1335820716; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=oz0kq5G7cvI0PguC8WMkTbYVquwzxw+2yJzMzAnVpVk=; b=fIij+bHaaHb32rf6dy0ccjCEY2ywrNmqQMKa9Uyeiw2JB4fXsKcf6VZ/ VEhQcjJXPrxFMPHYIWx/nOwJ0WsQ36Fn90i5kFLa612asgR5Mc+tquaLN Jsfv8bp7wZ16aHz5XXIyD4Ryap7LyIIYO5o8Z75C8l3CMGwxvclah4jSP k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aj4FAHyLjE+rRDoI/2dsb2JhbABEgxyvY4EHggkBAQEDAQEBAQ8BJy8BBAsFCwsYLicwBhMih2cEDJlRn18EkGZjBIhajROFcohagWmDBg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,430,1330905600"; d="scan'208";a="38234544"
Received: from mtv-core-3.cisco.com ([171.68.58.8]) by mtv-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 16 Apr 2012 21:18:36 +0000
Received: from [192.168.4.100] (sjc-fluffy-8914.cisco.com [10.20.249.165]) by mtv-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q3GLIad2017697; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 21:18:36 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHBDyN7p2YFp8LBK_dYcgYcujrO112nf37PmHN1nwawrxsS3Bw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 15:18:36 -0600
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <69E0EC88-CB36-4C9C-B149-1682DEBCA6EC@cisco.com>
References: <93CA273D-6111-4B2E-816F-B94EACEA0A95@cisco.com> <CAHBDyN7p2YFp8LBK_dYcgYcujrO112nf37PmHN1nwawrxsS3Bw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Update of future interim meeting locations
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 21:18:37 -0000

Mary, I think you are correct that the dates being considered are 

Clue - June 7 and 8 

WebRTC - June 11

RTCWeb - June 12 and 13

Sorry for confusion. 

On Apr 16, 2012, at 3:04 PM, Mary Barnes wrote:

> Just one clarification - I thought the W3C WebRTC group planned to meet on June 11th and then the IETF RTCWEB WG on June 12-13?  
> 
> The CLUE WG meeting still plans to meet on June 7-8.  
> 
> Regards,
> Mary. 
> 
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> The CLUE and WebRTC groups are making plans based on WebRTC meeting June 12 and 13 in Stockholm. The chairs believe that picking a different time or locations at this point will not be beneficial so we plan to try and confirm that date.
> 
> I'd like to try and answer the question about locations of RTCWeb interim meetings after the ones currently planned.
> 
> First of all, the chairs would are going to declare that there is WG consensus for a 1:1:1 meeting rotation between west coast of north america, europe, and east coast of north america and plan to run approximately equal number of meetings in these locations.  In counting the number of past meetings in a given region, we will include all the face to face RTCWeb and WebRTC meetings as this work is closely joined and a large number of the participants travel to both sets of meetings. The face to face meetings that happen at the main IETF or W3C meetings are included in this count. Collocated meetings will be counted just once as they only require one set of travel to that location.
> 
> Cullen  <RTCWeb co-chair>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>