Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan
Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 13 September 2013 17:48 UTC
Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C67F21F9C76 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 10:48:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y5UtUxgWHJDQ for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 10:48:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x22e.google.com (mail-ie0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F4D321E8115 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 10:47:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f174.google.com with SMTP id u16so3133743iet.5 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 10:47:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=r+SR8NPfS56FfTTm/JeyhxBg+Zhovr8gSUUi8cUWiNU=; b=Deak2C+/WSM/YHrUzch2c0O04SaFDmf2DJlzURd8UhlntOvj3EWhbI152BrVQIR/Wp DZZPo4QVib+HzY6EgkbjrVj4OPoDl0OCb39KZktEC0EM9VZbFXbfaDuTh20lfMaS3NPY xL6xcV/7RJrO19QWRmqxEGVASkG2D8u2upvrJX2p/gK84VuP5zSbdqqrDToGTu7P3i1G jUf9s+yofwHAISPFL9f7fV+2II3OR4+wrwuhJzoBNSNGcN+pa/XtyqVW6HJMaiyNDEhO n1HiCxkWylFvahoxiq7yYHbeAlRoiBGXii5ZEfmayB9vThig4vwvIKKdZaXyRqrDd/J9 KUfg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.111.197 with SMTP id ik5mr1776447igb.19.1379094471598; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 10:47:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.42.29.202 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 10:47:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BLU169-W111E8BA8C5A1AF65A7031F4933B0@phx.gbl>
References: <CA+9kkMAvdtq_gufKmDNCNCL+kKcxyi0MGUoVHetd9_DzbEdEnA@mail.gmail.com> <BLU169-W111E8BA8C5A1AF65A7031F4933B0@phx.gbl>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 10:47:51 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMDmCwhqwEiG_mGcG0J9TujR+dhwvhV9_9JOSfB777FZWA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b4142d6178d5e04e6477451"
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 17:48:25 -0000
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>wrote: > Ted -- > > The H.264 vs. VP8 discussion has at this point been "overtaken by events", > so that the proposed plan below would be a waste of everybody's time, about > as relevant as debating the fashion merits of bell bottoms versus nehru > jackets. > > With Google having announced plans to implement VP9 (potentially with > SVC), and with the recent ratification of H.265, the industry has moved on, > and so should RTCWEB. > > Hi Bernard, The agreement to specify a mandatory-to-implement video codec to avoid negotiation failure is a very long standing one. If you believe the MTI should be VP9 or H.265, you are welcome to propose either; please do so, however, in the form of a draft by October 6th so we can move forward knowing that it is your proposal. regards, Ted Hardie > ------------------------------ > Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 09:52:24 -0700 > From: ted.ietf@gmail.com > To: rtcweb@ietf.org; fluffy@cisco.com; magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com > Subject: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan > > > WG, > > The chairs have created a plan for how to perform the Video Codec > selection in our WG. The chairs are asking for review of our plan on > how to undertake the mandatory-to-implement video codec selection. > We'd much prefer to have comments on the mechanics before they begin, > so please review now. Proponents of a particular proposal should > note both the actions required and the timelines proposed. > > The main goal of this plan is to hold a consensus call on which of > the proposed alternatives we as a WG should select at one of the WG > sessions in Vancouver. Such a consensus call will of course be > verified on the mailing list for anyone who can't participate. The > chairs will recuse themselves from judging this particular > consensus. > > In the WG session each codec proposal will be allowed an equal amount > of time to highlight the arguments for their proposal. After that a > there will be a slot for discussion and clarifying questions. > > To enable the WG participants to get answers to any questions, the > proposals in draft form and any supporting material MUST be made > available by 6th of October. This is to ensure that the WG > participants can verify or object to any claims or statements in > the proposal material prior to the WG session. We chairs would really > not like to see the proponents bring up new arguments at their > presentation. Also the WG participants are expected to raise any > arguments on the list ahead of time to enable the proponents to > respond to such arguments. > > The proposed consensus questions will be of the following form: > > 1. If you support H.264 as the mandatory to implement codec or are > willing to live with it as the MTI, please raise your hand now. > > 2. If you support VP8 as the mandatory to implement codec or are > willing to live with it as the MTI, please raise your hand now. > > You may indicate support on both questions and we encourage you to do > so if you can live with either, even if you have a preference for one > over the other. > > Additional proposals than the previous ones are welcome, but must be > submitted as draft and their proponents must notify the chairs no later > than the 6th of October that they also have a candidate proposal. > > In case the WG fails to reach consensus we chairs propose that we use > the alternative decision process as discussed in RFC3929. The method > and its usage will be discussed on the list should the WG not > establish consensus on a proposal for mandatory to implement video codec. > > regards, > > Magnus, Cullen, and Ted > > _______________________________________________ rtcweb mailing list > rtcweb@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb >
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan Pete Resnick
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan John Leslie
- [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan Matthew Kaufman
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan Ralph Giles
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan Pete Resnick
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan Lorenzo Miniero
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan Roni Even
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan Bossiel
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan Simon Perreault
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan Bossiel
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan Chris Wendt
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan cb.list6
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan Leon Geyser
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan Monty Montgomery
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan Basil Mohamed Gohar
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan Gili