Re: [rtcweb] MTI Video Codec: a novel proposal

Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> Tue, 11 November 2014 00:25 UTC

Return-Path: <roman@telurix.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 444291A8799 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 16:25:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8aWy6sR341QQ for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 16:25:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 839BE1AC449 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 16:25:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id bs8so82190wib.17 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 16:25:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=XmeNmBs+7kF/l4HLj+w1QREs5W3tPYjUyq48gw3h670=; b=ZMqHX2cP/B7mK/XqdKNfFN9H8MLP4QyNixbyulAaJH68p8IPKpH5qecG5tx+XV1pRm 9tbl8BiCA8sRzoHfhJLV0dU1L7PWOOMY0CZvSASCZzSOHbSNZ5/zMkvRm8ruabp7wcCm PGAmg4nwmrf5R91AtfYwacPLJPS+ofYgLfwIGjX2AvwFD3XHqADrgCTW8XXjv29Wjmaf fuNXHDwWFOz/7iMukIHOBZagWa6hNJ6DWdNlWGI80eKElGDrYPgWvQ3vGIpxHvjWrrIC 7HiBxs4o3HosN4yKNfbo/Jpdjt4qh9omVbNK5T1IeXaictuJlwYauwJ5wD9owUCoH8+a RDkg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkIepis51XxJApk4UcV+G+oTXVX6kDIQFXgFPpAwmOtXpHc5iZoQ5JL/AYkJT5WaEAilabT
X-Received: by 10.194.236.232 with SMTP id ux8mr48873219wjc.96.1415665538283; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 16:25:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com (mail-wi0-f173.google.com. [209.85.212.173]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id wr9sm25088985wjb.42.2014.11.10.16.25.36 for <rtcweb@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 10 Nov 2014 16:25:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id n3so94982wiv.12 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 16:25:36 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.107.35 with SMTP id gz3mr36204025wib.38.1415665536666; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 16:25:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.216.176.65 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 16:25:36 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <176316D6-D685-45F4-AA8E-A4F07521CAE4@matthew.at>
References: <54601E19.8080203@nostrum.com> <176316D6-D685-45F4-AA8E-A4F07521CAE4@matthew.at>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 19:25:36 -0500
Message-ID: <CAD5OKxvyKRBwSdn3GM7sL3iRmYRvyLRRVFwedD5GJgYfsDVM2Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
To: Matthew Kaufman <matthew@matthew.at>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f3b9b696f147805078a5122
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/UHXmGwsgzpX2puz4c7xSUThrbg4
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] MTI Video Codec: a novel proposal
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 00:25:41 -0000

On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Matthew Kaufman <matthew@matthew.at>; wrote:

> We may be tired of this, but it isn't like we have a royalty-free option
> for H.264 MPEG-LA or IP risk indemnification from Google.. So what's
> changed for the browser makers?
>
>
May be I am missing something, but MPEG-LA does not provide IP risk
indemnification for H.264. All they sell is a very limited license to the
patent pool from the group members.