Re: [rtcweb] Protesting the QoS document decision

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Thu, 19 December 2013 17:22 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70C701AE156 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 09:22:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SofEq3QGXNLz for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 09:22:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7C581ADBCB for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 09:22:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.66] (76-218-9-215.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.9.215]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id rBJHLtmW002026 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 19 Dec 2013 09:21:58 -0800
Message-ID: <52B32AE7.1080100@dcrocker.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 09:20:39 -0800
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, rai-ads@tools.ietf.org, tsv-ads@tools.ietf.org
References: <5283DF61.9060807@alvestrand.no> <52B31AF0.60107@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <52B31AF0.60107@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.66]); Thu, 19 Dec 2013 09:21:59 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Protesting the QoS document decision
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 17:22:11 -0000

On 12/19/2013 8:12 AM, Magnus Westerlund wrote:
> This is clearly a failure by us chairs to ensure
> sufficient transparency and a venue to timely protest that decision.


A failure in transparency is actually the lesser offense, though lesser 
does not mean minor.

The deeper error is that the chairs felt they had authority to make a 
decision that really belonged to the working group.

This occurrence seems to be an exemplar of a pattern.

d/
-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net