Re: [rtcweb] Plan for MTI video codec?

Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com> Thu, 16 October 2014 22:02 UTC

Return-Path: <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5047C1A8AB8 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 15:02:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4Axf-Ou-iv5O for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 15:02:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-x234.google.com (mail-pd0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75E041A8029 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 15:02:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pd0-f180.google.com with SMTP id fp1so3943035pdb.25 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 15:02:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:from:subject:date:to; bh=AqbAsSCysaC6nvXyYlBlvuoQcZCAhQ00L5WTak+bYKo=; b=zUQP5Gyfv5mDA/B+S1YvCNfXIVB76NL3RMI6ZxjyblHtoNjenldBHvPj3Ra5wJpzcH y7O+xD630h2bA3//NB5QkbAzgmkX329NHSfa8FQnPEn0xX9p4h1e4JcbnuCOCw/JVd9Z JtGliVQDFrh9DwLal07d3fZ/UmaLfD8/7clgowsWGXGgUxe36/ucnvmVDCB+GfcbzQX1 wvzzC5ZE02I3Ry9JngkkX7GuRJ8+cP480ItWbW2dlG4ieDqLlAwBE+dqUlstwjpE/shi kzOBuPP71kQ7yfNboN+6R2IEVIeiIiYPo6yVZSamUkWZ5UKLrOuSkXKKu/PLEyOHdHC0 EGdA==
X-Received: by 10.68.219.164 with SMTP id pp4mr4000896pbc.143.1413496956150; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 15:02:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.7.5.253] (mobile-166-137-212-118.mycingular.net. [166.137.212.118]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 16sm20656851pdj.42.2014.10.16.15.02.34 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 16 Oct 2014 15:02:34 -0700 (PDT)
References: <CAGTXFp-HVJDwd86207PNM2QVYO4Z_K4WF-KarnRs1fb7nvy4zA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMDfES8gpi0-PTXpCnQHjFYUSF2r44TNzH5B4UfDGo8PtA@mail.gmail.com> <CAGTXFp8O-7ACksk3v3f=KjCkcDb4e8G=t-e=EJ1503vt7TkpCQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAGTXFp867AMUZ_fEKxG9uAoR1H1AirVHi3-ayJ=KTQk9L+C7+g@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMAZufR7gUrwkS7Tf5GOfg+ZtsZWGcn-8YLCvnmYnTgfFw@mail.gmail.com> <544035DE.8000606@matthew.at> <CABkgnnUNgWaauS6-nZ5fcExjsMPy4ZGPXaahduzA39=iqh9+fQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnUNgWaauS6-nZ5fcExjsMPy4ZGPXaahduzA39=iqh9+fQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D5D11F2B-9E32-4932-A601-F1D7FD50C706@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12A405)
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 15:02:30 -0700
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/bvW7qk0MTrUmwWlJLSsBatFrpnU
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Plan for MTI video codec?
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 22:02:38 -0000

One thing we could do instead of wasting time on MTI is to actually make progress on Sections 4.2 - 4.4 of draft-IETF-RTCWEB-video, so we could actually interoperate regardless of the codec.



> On Oct 16, 2014, at 2:28 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 16 October 2014 14:17, Matthew Kaufman <matthew@matthew.at> wrote:
>> And that's because something substantive has changed, or simply because
>> wasting the WG time on this again is more entertaining than actually
>> finishing a specification that can be independently implemented by all
>> browser vendors? (A specification that we are nowhere near having, as far as
>> I can tell)
> 
> Personally, I've found the reprieve from this fight refreshing.  And
> it would appear that we've made some real progress as a result.  I'd
> suggest that if we don't have new information, we continue to spend
> our time productively.  If we can't find topics to occupy our meeting
> agenda time, then maybe we can free an agenda slot.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb