Re: [sidr] WGLC: draft-ietf-sidr-origin-ops

Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net> Sat, 15 October 2011 01:53 UTC

Return-Path: <aservin@lacnic.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B75621F8CD4; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 18:53:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, HOST_EQ_DIALUP=0.862, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=0.877, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8Su88vASclN2; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 18:53:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.lacnic.net.uy (mail.lacnic.net.uy [IPv6:2001:13c7:7001:4000::3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE32821F8BE9; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 18:53:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.103] (r186-48-192-106.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy [186.48.192.106]) by mail.lacnic.net.uy (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0ED8308458; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 23:53:38 -0200 (UYST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1244.3)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLaaOm_=W85r3P990A6DtROTcQwSJ-KBRzAi9ugw1Bo1_cQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 23:53:35 -0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E4B4DE52-BBB3-4FA0-A75A-B51824BA83E7@lacnic.net>
References: <CAL9jLaaOm_=W85r3P990A6DtROTcQwSJ-KBRzAi9ugw1Bo1_cQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christopher Morrow <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1244.3)
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-SpamCheck:
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-From: aservin@lacnic.net
Cc: sidr-chairs@ietf.org, sidr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sidr] WGLC: draft-ietf-sidr-origin-ops
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 01:53:42 -0000

	I just have one comment.

	What's the rationale of this change from version 10 to 11?

10
"Announcements with Invalid origins MAY be used, but SHOULD be 
less  preferred than those with Valid or NotFound."

11
"Announcements with Invalid origins SHOULD NOT be used, but MAY be
   used to meet special operational needs.  In such circumstances, the
   announcement SHOULD have a lower preference than that given to Valid
   or NotFound."

	I thought that the "common understanding" was to be more flexible as version 10 indicates. For various reasons I think that recommending version 11 would end up with some problems because initial inexperience in RPKI (configuration, operation, etc.) and people being very strict in their policies.

Regards,
as


On 14 Oct 2011, at 11:36, Christopher Morrow wrote:

> SIDR Folk,
> Please see the subject, draft-ietf-sidr-origin-ops is at version 11,
> it's gotten some significant feedback over it's lifetime and is now
> stabilized. Let's re-read and consider passing this up to the IESG for
> their review, eh?
> 
>  Tools page for doc:
> <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/sidr/draft-ietf-sidr-origin-ops/>
>  Draft link: <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-origin-ops-11.txt>
> 
> Please consider this draft in WGLC at this time, we'll end that in 2
> weeks time (10/28/2011).
> 
> -Chris
> <co-chair>
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr