Re: [sidr] WGLC: draft-ietf-sidr-origin-ops

Danny McPherson <danny@tcb.net> Mon, 14 November 2011 06:08 UTC

Return-Path: <danny@tcb.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E873511E8207 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 22:08:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7lTJqZXn9dc2 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 22:08:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dog.tcb.net (dog.tcb.net [64.78.150.133]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6873A11E80AB for <sidr@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 22:08:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by dog.tcb.net (Postfix, from userid 0) id 13DEC268063; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 23:08:05 -0700 (MST)
Received: from dhcp-1267.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-1267.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.18.103]) (authenticated-user smtp) (TLSv1/SSLv3 AES128-SHA 128/128) by dog.tcb.net with SMTP; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 23:08:04 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from danny@tcb.net)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Danny McPherson <danny@tcb.net>
In-Reply-To: <m2sjlr72cq.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 01:07:48 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <0892B192-DA37-4621-AC98-A5A48DBCFBEE@tcb.net>
References: <CAL9jLaaOm_=W85r3P990A6DtROTcQwSJ-KBRzAi9ugw1Bo1_cQ@mail.gmail.com> <E4B4DE52-BBB3-4FA0-A75A-B51824BA83E7@lacnic.net> <m2hb3a7uqp.wl%randy@psg.com> <m2fwiu7uji.wl%randy@psg.com> <CAL9jLabcaLnBbZXbNf7Lbv+ppm-h9yO+wBHunG4s1=emOyM6=w@mail.gmail.com> <805B0799-7026-4532-A53C-4CFE3E863A33@castlepoint.net> <m2hb2q4uhj.wl%randy@psg.com> <6054A2B1-40D3-49E6-8972-946D426E830B@castlepoint.net> <DCC302FAA9FE5F4BBA4DCAD4656937791451629610@PRVPEXVS03.corp.twcable.com> <CAL9jLaZ2LYj4J0kzHd0p3a0RGtuPZ+7PiGVPQe2pzquEstchwg@mail.gmail.com> <m2sjlr72cq.wl%randy@psg.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] WGLC: draft-ietf-sidr-origin-ops
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 06:08:06 -0000

On Nov 13, 2011, at 11:30 PM, Randy Bush wrote:

> NotFound is a keyword.


I assume it was derived from the normative pfx-validate draft and was 
simply hoping for consistent use:

danny@pork% grep -i found draft-ietf-sidr-pfx-validate-03.txt
   peer will be found to have one of the following "validation states":
   o  Not found: No ROA Covers the Route Prefix.
   //Initialize result to "not found" state
   result = BGP_PFXV_STATE_NOT_FOUND;
   //"not found" applies to this validation operation.
   will result in "not found" state and the prefixes will be advertised
   also result in "not found" state.  The implementation is expected to

"Not found" != "NotFound", that's all...

Makes searching and dependency simpler.

-danny